Oops: Backscatter x-ray machines "tear apart DNA"

Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:26PM EDT

See Comments (25)

The latest airport security trend is the backscatter x-ray machine, touted as a powerful way to virtually frisk a traveler for contraband without the embarassment of a strip search.

Though touted as completely safe because the level of radiation is so low, travelers have been nervous about the devices -- and not just because it shows off a nice outline of their privates to the people manning the machines -- but because they remain scared of the health problems they might propose.

Looks like a little healthy paranoia might have been a good thing. While the conventional wisdom has held that so-called "terahertz radiation," upon which backscatter x-ray machines are based, is harmless because it doesn't carry enough energy to do cellular or genetic damage, new research suggests that may be completely wrong.

Specifically, researchers have found that terahertz radiation may interfere directly with DNA. Although the force generated is small, the waves have been found to "unzip double-stranded DNA, creating bubbles in the double strand that could significantly interfere with processes such as gene expression and DNA replication."

I'm not a doctor, but that just doesn't sound good.

The question now is whether this is or isn't safe. Terahertz waves occur naturally in the environment, and we're hit with them all the time. But should we bombard ourselves with them willingly every time we pass through an airport? No one knows how much terahertz radiation is OK for the body to absorb: Just like sunlight, a little may be fine, while a lot may be deadly. Where does the line get drawn?

Who knows? I, for one, am given a little pause by the news, and hope research continues on before these machines become commonplace.

Comments on Oops: Backscatter x-ray machines "tear apart DNA"

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by nikaconstanti on Fri Oct 30, 2009 3:17PM EDT Report Abuse

    wow, did the unzipping of the double stranded DNA and creating the bubble in the helix mean that some other matching piece of RNA ( like virus), perhaps some other unvinded DNA can lock in or lock together ( splice) and start some process? or this cell will stop to replicate?

  • 2 Posted by macksumum1 on Fri Oct 30, 2009 3:21PM EDT Report Abuse

    i could care less because i never fly and never will again.

  • 3 Posted by scubydu1968 on Fri Oct 30, 2009 3:53PM EDT Report Abuse

    Hey now, that's pretty scary stuff. Since the rush to improve security measures at airports after 9/11 several new, unproven and possibly dangerous technologies have surfaced all in the name of protection, security, and safety. Safe for who though? Look how long it takes for the FDA to push drugs through clinical trials before they can ever be distributed. I think higher regulatory standards, tougher scrutiny and longer field trials are definitely a necessity! I want to be safe but I sure as heck don't want to put my nut$ in a microwave in the process of doing so!

  • 4 Posted by magpagbst on Fri Oct 30, 2009 3:58PM EDT Report Abuse

    i like it that you can see detailed contours of those wonderfully-shaped symmetrical breasts . . . i'd let her through . . .

  • 5 Posted by wykafox on Fri Oct 30, 2009 5:24PM EDT Report Abuse

    besides giving the security a free show the scan causes DNA problems they better fix this problem FAST or people will find away around this for health reasons alone

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.