Multitasking Will Make Your Brain Explode

Tue Mar 27, 2007 4:10PM EDT

See Comments (599)

I live for multitasking. I would get nothing done without it. I watch TV while I'm writing, read a story in another window, keep a magazine propped to one side, and answer emails/the phone/the doorbell on the side. And according to a new study this is all going to lead to my ruin.

The New York Times reports on a new study that basically says multitasking actually makes you less efficient than if you concentrated on one thing at a time. I'm not entirely sure that's what it says, though. I was talking on the phone while reading the article. (Kidding!)

To some extent, this is common sense. It's long been known that talking on a cell phone while driving a car is exceedingly dangerous. Some studies say it's just as bad as driving drunk.

But the science of the phenomenon is intriguing. I feel more productive when doing multiple things at once, but maybe I'm not. The key, says the researcher, is that you lose time and focus when you switch between tasks. Try it for yourself. Type half of a sentence. Go check your email. Then come back and try to finish your thought. It's tough to get back in the groove of what you were doing.

The expert advice? Check email once an hour. And turn off outside distractions except, maybe, for soft background music. 

As for me, I'm going to experiment with checking my email less frequently and see how that works for my concentration. An hour? No, but I am changing my "check for new messages" setting in Outlook from checking once every two minutes to every five.

So, multitaskers: Still think working on more than one thing at a time makes you more productive? Sound off! 

LINK: Slow Down, Brave Multitasker, and Don't Read This in Traffic 

Comments on Multitasking Will Make Your Brain Explode

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 6 Posted by pquirk777 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:18PM EDT Report Abuse

    I think Charles Emerson Winchester III may have said it best: "I do one thing, I do it very well, and then I move on."

  • 8 Posted by benth1@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:05PM EDT Report Abuse

    Anyone thinking they can focus on more than one task at a time are just kidding themselves. It is an aspect of "Peter's Principal". The more things you try to do at one time the less effecient you become, as well as being less competent at any given task.

  • 9 Posted by rpmcaninch on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:53PM EDT Report Abuse

    In a hi tech environment multitasking is a crock. Trying to juggle many complex tasks only means that they may never get done. The tasks you are able to finish aren't done well. A few of my tasks are: writing a program in C# that will be a tool for engineering, loading and configuring multiple computers to test new software, move software from one server to a remote server and test, write a program to pull reports everyday, and the list goes on. I keep hearing the phrase, 'Do more with less,' but Les never comes to work. Bottom line, if you want quality, then the quantity has to be deminished. It takes too long to remember where I was on the last task when I get back to it. When fires crop up that have to be done, my list just gets pushed aside for a while. Multitasking on complex projects is very inefficient and poses risks to each project in the stack.

  • 11 Posted by mcjepsen on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:13PM EDT Report Abuse

    This completely confirms my disdain for Instant Messaging. Nothing is a bigger productivity killer!

  • 12 Posted by passionforquilting on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:00PM EDT Report Abuse

    Doing more than one thing at the same time does lower the quality of the work of both. Sometimes the quality isn't as important as the completion. When quality does matter, I start one project - say putting food on the stove and setting the alarm - then move on to do something else - like do my taxes - then when the buzzer goes off or if I smell something - go back to the kitchen. Even though more than one task is being completed, my part of the task is being done in succession. This isn't multitasking because I am doing one thing at a time, and I am being efficient because I am getting more than one thing done.

  • 13 Posted by ds.peake@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:48PM EDT Report Abuse

    Put something on the stove and leave the room!? Dangerous! Hope you don't have to "multi-task" getting everyone out of the house at the same time because of a fire! Or at the least, "multi-task" talking on the phone with your insurance adjuster while cleaning the mess from a stove fire. Been there, done that.

  • 14 Posted by laura_elizabeth_manzo on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:57PM EDT Report Abuse

    I find it interesting that most employess look for someone who is able to multi-task. Maybe they should read this report.

  • 15 Posted by ahuvush on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:47PM EDT Report Abuse

    I suspect all the experts forgot to take one thing in consideration. When I'm not multi-tasking, I'm stopping every few minutes anyway. I just don't get anything else done too. Instead, I'm daydreaming, remembering the words to that song or just trying to bite off that irritating cuticle. So, I'd like to see a study that understands that people get bored doing just one thing and can be distracted by their own thoughts.

  • 16 Posted by bulldogjt44 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:15PM EDT Report Abuse

    I totally agree that multi-tasking is not efficient. We need to do less things better over a fixed period of time. Our Society has lost track of quality both in work production and life. We need to begin slowing down and bringing quality and value back into our workplace and our lives!

  • 17 Posted by roxanne2819@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:53PM EDT Report Abuse

    Some people think if you dont multitask you are slow or stupid. I think that it's easier to concentrate one thing I would not get anything if I multitask.

  • 18 Posted by thorild@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:08PM EDT Report Abuse

    I am a machine operator. As I am running one job, I can set up the next as well as clean my work area. I have periods of downtime of maybe 30 seconds as my machine operates, so I use this natural break to line up more materials and clean. Perhaps the issue is that it is much more difficult to multitask dissimilar things, especially if they interrupt each other. Luckily, mine do not.

  • 20 Posted by ballyhootnholler on Wed Mar 28, 2007 7:00AM EDT Report Abuse

    Multitasking like that is just another way of saying you suffer from untreadted adult ADD or something similar. It's no wonder it's so difficult to get anything done in this country anymore. It took three weeks just to get my long distance carrier changed because the process was riddled with mistakes and oversights made by people working in envirorments of stress and sensory overload. It's just pathetic when I as the customer have to lead the people whoes job it is by the nose to get the job done.

  • 21 Posted by mgraf1236@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:17PM EDT Report Abuse

    Have you ever been at a restaurant paying the check after standing in a long line only to have the cashier get a phone call when you are trying to pay? Since she can't do more than one thing at a time you have to continue to stand there while she finishes talking on the phone. Multitasking is probably good when you have to do several tasks at once that don't require a lot of thought: like chew gum and listen to the radio while diapering the baby. Mercy

  • 22 Posted by pjkblue on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:13PM EDT Report Abuse

    "Multitasking" is what everyone does everyday, but in the business world it has somehow taken on this very mythological aura. It's a cost-cutting way to get the better employees working more. This way, the slack-off workers get help from the people who finish quickly and efficiently, saving their lousy jobs and they'll get the credit. "OH, JIM... YOU'RE FINISHED! GREAT! HOW ABOUT THIS PROJECT!" So, poor Jim adds more to the pile while, Joe-Schmoe is kicking back with his Coolatta laughing away.

  • 23 Posted by bedbugs85032 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:04PM EDT Report Abuse

    You're kidding, right? As I sit here watching TV and listening to the radio waiting for my favorite song to come on while writting this you tell me that my multitasking is going to ruin me? I don't think so. I can get so much done at once that I am even thinking of getting dressed while I shower to cut down on time wasted along with doing the dishes while I shower to cut down on time and water. OH CRAP, I missed my song and the news is now over on the TV. What happens to the time? I am actually surprised that the government didnt spend our tax money on that waste of time. But then again, maybe they are still doing the research on this one just to come up with no real news.

  • 24 Posted by nbmiii on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:34PM EDT Report Abuse

    I also think it depends on what tasks you are combining, while I almost never multitask at work due to the compexity of the jobs at hom i tend to combine things like watching TV and eating or preparing food for cooking(peeling, chopping Etc,).

  • 25 Posted by shogun_scar on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:21PM EDT Report Abuse

    a TEACHER is definitely a multitasker i reckon.

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.