Thu Aug 24, 2006 2:22PM EDT
See Comments (527)
Tiny implantable chips have long been available for your pets: The microchips are about the size of a grain of rice, and they are permanently inserted under the skin of your dog or cat. The chip includes a unique ID number that, once read by a veterinarian, can be traced back to you via an online database.
Well you know what I'm about to say had to happen eventually: A similar chip is being proposed for use in humans.
Before you can say "the sign of the beast," lets get some details out of the way. The plan, being lobbied for by the company VeriChip, would replace military dog tags with implanted RFID chips containing information about the soldier's identity and medical history. The plan calls for the chip to be optional and that, of course, they're perfectly safe.
I've no doubt that the chips are medically safe, but I'm deeply worried about how such a system could be abused. In the absence of any other identification, would an RFID implant serve to identify a soldier? RFID data can be faked or cloned relatively easily, and the possibility for someone to masquerade as a legitimate soldier is huge. The implications for the military are especially scary, and that of course is just an obvious first step. Could "chipping" the public follow suit in a few years? I for one am scared silly by the thought of how easy these RFID chips could make identity theft. All a would-be thief would potentially need is an RFID scanner and a convenient bump into you in the street.
The good news is that Congress so far seems pretty unthrilled with the idea, and so far the plan hasn't gotten very far. But the lobbies behind the chip are powerful and have money to burn, so don't expect this idea to go away any time soon. Meanwhile, educate yourself about the technology, write your congressmen, and have your pets spayed and neutered.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
The chip is of grave concern. I see it being implimented in prisoners or immigrants first. Will they start with fingerprints and then go to the chip? Could it carry all my personal information? YES! So, how do we stop it? Seriously stop it in a nation where no-one seems to stand up for anything anymore if it takes an effort or sacrifice? How many of you turned out for an "anti-open border" rally?....strictly an example~
RFID is just another way that the government will be able to have full control over the people, so that the "group" that controls the government will have full control over the people, so as to fulfill their agenda, which can only happen when there's no resistance from "free" people. Beware of all this technology that presents itself as being merely for the purpose of more "convenience" etc.in our lives when most of them are basically "trojan horses", gaining more and more entrance and control and access to us; we are being like the frog in the pot, slowly being boiled alive without our realizing it until it's too late. At this point, I am only relying on the safety and security I find in belonging to Jesus Christ.
Hey, I LIKE the idea...put it on your kids and don't remove until they are 18. At least I can keep track of where they are! Just think, it would be like the "good old days", when you could let your children go to the park, or walk to school, or play in the neighborhood, and parents didn't have to worry.
I don't like cybernetic technology unless it alleviates a handicap. Though the implementation might be carried out by perfectly noble people with only the best of intentions, there is no guarantee that sometime down the line, no one will take advantage of a vulnerability it may represent. Anonymity is a right that everyone should be able to express, and with the chip it would be possible for people with the proper equipment to eliminate that right.
Want a slim digicam that can take still photos as well as create YouTube friendly videos? Check this ...
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by smokey2000@sbcglobal.net on Fri Aug 25, 2006 6:46PM EDT Report Abuse
I believe this to be a very bad idea. If the people around me don't know who I am, and I can't tell them, they most likely don't need to know. If a person in the service is killed and there is no way to return the body amdthere is no dog tag, how will the person be identified? Sounds like a poor solution to a situation where there is no problem.