Mon Aug 28, 2006 4:45PM EDT
See Comments (4)
Somehow, despite the fact that I live in California and write about technology every day, I have missed the fact that our legislature is set to ban talking on cell phones while operating an automobile... by Friday of this week.
I'd known that California was "considering" such a ban, but I'd long thought that Southern California types, who have cell phones surgically attached to their palms at birth, would have complained so loudly that this would have completely stalled. Most people (myself included) have long felt that anti-cell laws would be enacted "anywhere but in California."
But sometimes the government surprises you: The bill is expected to be signed by Arnold Schwarzenegger by the end of the week.
Naturally, there's more than meets the eye here: The move is widely considered to be a political play by the embattered Governator, who's seeking re-election soon. Even those who support the bill (like me) can't be thrilled with its toothless punishments: A $20 fine for the first infraction; $50 thereafter. That'll teach 'em, right? The law would also not go into effect until January 1, 2008 and would expire on July 1, 2011, unless renewed. Hands-free phones are still allowed.
Many bloviators have come out of the closet in recent days to complain about the law, exclaiming that hands-free phones are just as dangerous as hand-held ones (a disputed notion), and that other distractions—makeup applications, screaming kids, radio fiddling—are just as problematic. That may be true, but unfortunately there's little that can be done about some of these scapegoats. Outlaw children? Outlaw lipstick? Well, we probably ought to do the latter, but that troublesome cell phone has truly become epidemic. Today they're responsible for an estimated 5 percent of all accidents. (Though the #1 cause is so much more annoying: rubbernecking.)
So are cell phones a scapegoat for bad driving? Maybe so, but what a valid scapegoat they are. The new law is weak, it doesn't address all the problems with bad driving, and it will never be enforced, but I think it's a fair first step that we badly need. If nothing else, now we can feel legitimate and in the legal right when we yell at people on their cell phones to "shut up and drive." Citizen's arrest, anyone?
Your comments and responses are welcome below.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
Thats california for you. Actually Im surprised they havent outlawed this sooner as fanatical as they are here. One more ticket and it's just another day in paradise.
IT'S BEEN SO LONG OVERDUE. A lot of people are busy on their phones while driving on the fast lane of the freeways, and causes so much inconvenience and accidents to some innocent drivers. They should slap more heavy penalties to these "who cares people".
IT WILL BE USED BY POLICE FOR ONE MORE EXCUSE TO PULL PEOPLE OVER... NOW IF IT IS A "BAD" GUY ALL WELL AND GOOD... BUT IF IT IS JUST AN ADDITION TO A "QUOTA" THE SUPERVISOR SUGGESTS ....... WELL...???? LAWS LIKE THIS IMPACT ON WHAT LITTLE QUALITY OF LIFE THERE IS IN SOME OF THESE SITUATIONS.... NOW IF YOU REALLY DIDN'T WANT TO BE RE-ELECTED... BAN THE PHONES FOR ALL APPLICATIONS...WHILE DRIVING... PULL OVER..NOT TOO BAD... BUT... CAN YOU SEE IT... ALL THE CARS ON THE FREEWAY TRYING TO PULL OVER OR PULL OUT ... NOW THAT WOULD BE A DRIVING EXPERIENCE...
The Sony Cybershot DSC-N2 camera is Texas-big in a sub-compact package! It's a 10.1 megapixel point- ...
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by darktruth06 on Tue Aug 29, 2006 12:17AM EDT Report Abuse
Personally, I think the punishments are nothing more than a slap on the wrist. $20 and $50 fines are nothing. At least offer some sort of other negative consequence: maybe after 3 infractions your license is suspended for 10 days. For each additional, the number of days increases. It sounds cruel, but I can't tell you how many times I've seen people nearly cause accidents because they were chatting on their cell phones.