What's the Deal with Laser TV?

Mon Jun 4, 2007 1:20PM EDT

See Comments (10)

Reader Jeff writes: Have you seen or heard anything about laser TVs by Novalus/Arasor? They are supposed to be better than lcd and plasma and are supposed to debut late this year or early '08. I'm thinking of buying Sceptre's 42-inch LCD but don't know if I should wait for the newer tech.

People have been talking about laser television for a full year now, and I've still never seen one in person. Some bloggers have, however, and the reports indicate the technology is at least real and not complete vaporware, as some have suspected. You can read early coverage here at Cnet and a hands-on report from a few weeks ago at Gizmodo. Both cover Mitsubishi's laser DLP technology, the company I'd say is probably most likely to commercialize laser TV first.

So what is it? Laser DLP is not really as sexy as it sounds. The use of "laser" in the technology's name probably gets geeks a little sweaty, and I don't blame them, but we're not talking about a robo-TV wandering around your living room with beams shooting out of its soulless eyes.

Rather, laser DLP simply takes existing projection TV technology and uses a laser for the light source instead of traditional lamp, traditionally an incandescent-type bulb but more recently LED-based. The benefits include brighter picture, better color, and slimmer, lighter sets. And unlike traditional bulbs, these light sources don't burn out. Overall, we're talking about a modest improvement to some long-standing tech.

Of course, you're still using projection technology, which is never going to be as thin and light as an LCD, a technology which is going to see a lot more advancement over the next few years than DLP is. Projector TVs don't look bad, but flat panels really are where the industry is heading. In other words: While DLP may see incremental improvements and get 5 to 10 percent brighter/bigger/more colorful each year, LCDs will probably improve at twice that pace.

Coupled with the fact that there's really no telling when laser DLP will hit the market or how much it will cost, I wouldn't recommend holding out for some hypothetical technology, no matter how great it's "supposed" to be. As with most tech buying decisions, I suggest getting the best equipment you can right now (or the immediate future), at the budget you're willing to spend. There will always be something better around the corner at a better price, and if you keep waiting and waiting for it to arrive, you'll simply never buy anything.

Comments on What's the Deal with Laser TV?

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 6 Posted by quickwhitefox@rogers.com on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:24PM EDT Report Abuse

    "There’s no reason for Laser TV to fail." - Except that Co.s have invested all their time, energy, money and resources into LCD and Plasma. Why would they bother introducing a new tech when they have yet to make thier $$ on the current one? Arasor may have created the wave of the future, but that future is a long way off. Dammit. :|

  • 7 Posted by b_tinker@verizon.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:16PM EDT Report Abuse

    "never going to be as thin and light as an LCD"? This guy isn't even a writer! Have you done *any* research? Maybe thin, but light? Just because LCDs are thin doesn't mean they are light. I guess they just look light because they are thin. A 50 inch DLP weighs 60 lbs, a typical 50 inch LCD weighs 90 lbs, and a typical 50 inch plasma weighs 125 lbs (those numbers are sure to change, all probably smaller). And I don't think I'd ever use the word 'never' when it comes to technology.

  • 8 Posted by tgschwartz@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:02PM EDT Report Abuse

    All I have to say is http://www.believingisseeing.tv/ This will tell you who is the KING of big screen televisions.

  • 10 Posted by max_headroom27606 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:12PM EDT Report Abuse

    I think everyone, including the writer, is missing the point here. The only thing changing is the light source. Doing that won't make it "sharper" or "faster", it's simply making it cheaper. Depending on how they handle the light mixing, it "should" make the colors more vibrant. The light output will have to be attenuated because raw source would be far too bright to view. Also using lasers for dlp won't make the blacks any blacker. Either light exists for a pixel or it doesn't. Keep in mind that a laser is a monochromatic light source, not a magic wand. What buyers SHOULD be concerned about is overall picture quality, which actually is (be it slowly) improving with lcd, plasma, and dlp. It still hasn't reached the level that properly calibrated crt projectors achieved several years ago, but it IS improving. I have seen so many crappy sets at the major outlets (Best Buy, CC, etc..) and just shake my head at those clamoring to buy them because they are "thin" and not really taking a long hard look at the picture quality. Oh well, my 2 cents worth. I suggest you do some reading on avsforums before you decide to flame the post though. The education there is priceless when it comes to video.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.