Wed Jun 6, 2007 1:25PM EDT
See Comments (50)
Reader Chris writes: I'm in the market for an LCD TV. Is it worthwhile to purchase a 1080p set over a 720p TV? HD broadcasts are only 1080i and I only have a progressive scan dvd player (waiting to see which high-definition DVD format wins).
This is a confusing issue that is stymieing many current TV buyers: Future content will be heavily delivered in 1080p format, but virtually nothing you have today is, especially if you don't have a high-definition DVD player. Should you "future-proof" by buying a 1080p set now or will you be fine with a 720p/1080i set?
The first question you should ask is how soon you expect to make the jump to 1080p content. In a year? In three years? The longer you wait, the more appropriate a 720p set will be today and the less sense it makes to buy a 1080p set. Rest assured, without a 1080p signal going into it, you'll see no difference in quality on a 720p vs. a 1080p set. If you think you'll go high-def in the next 12 months, though, it makes more sense to consider 1080p now.
Another issue is overall quality, even if you do go with 1080p. Very few TV viewers can tell the difference between a 720p, a 1080i, and a 1080p signal. While you'll see more differences between 720p and 1080p on a paused picture, virtually all TV watching is done with moving images, where ultrafine detail often goes unnoticed. You might try this for yourself at a TV showroom. See if you can tell the difference between a 720p and 1080p image side by side when standing 12 feet away from the set. If you're getting a smaller TV, you may never be able to notice any difference at all if you sit at a standard viewing distance. Your eyes simply won't be able to see the detail. (Use this calculator to help determine whether going to 1080 will make any difference depending on how big a set you're buying.)
Last but not least, there's price. As you know, TV prices are all over the map, but going from a 720p to a 1080p set will add substantially to the cost of your set. I did some spot-checking on 720p vs. 1080p sets from the same manufacturer, of the same size, and from the same retailer, and found that 1080p adds about 50 percent to the cost of the TV. Deals and features, of course, vary widely, but that was pretty consistent in my examinations. For a 45-inch TV, that could mean a $1000 price difference... all for something you might not be able to notice at all. That's worth thinking about.
Finally, there's the issue that 1080p is probably not the end of the line for video resolution. Already people are talking about 2160p, "super high-definition," "ultra HD," and other next-gen formats. It's really an inevitability that one or more of them will someday come to pass. 1080p could eventually look like junk in comparison to them... provided, of course, you're sitting 3 inches from the screen.
I know there's a lot of conflicting advice here, so I want to leave you with a bottom line: Choose the size set that will work in your home and has the connectors you need, then buy the best TV (the one that looks best to you) you can afford now, whether it's 1080p or not. Being happy with the picture you see is a lot more important than whether it has some mysterious specs under the hood which don't really mean anything in the end.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
10800p is so much better than 720p. You can tell the difference in even a 32" TV. The person who wrote this article has no idea what they are talking about. The ultrafine detail can be seen from a distance. For a 40" set, I would reccomend between 7' and 11'. This article needs to be rewritten with better, more comprehensive research completed beforehand in order to prevent another almost completely worthless article like this one.
there is a big difference between 1080p and 720p if you are sitting 3 feet away from the screen...if you sit at a normal viewing distance there is no difference unless you have 20/15 vision
if any of you worry that much about a tv resolution....you watch too much tv! Save your money towards your kids college fund or maybe take a woman on a nice date and not fast food because you had to have the best tv that someone else sold you on.
"10800p is so much better than 720p. You can tell the difference in even a 32" TV. The person who wrote this article has no idea what they are talking about. The ultrafine detail can be seen from a distance. For a 40" set, I would reccomend between 7' and 11'. This article needs to be rewritten with better, more comprehensive research completed beforehand in order to prevent another almost completely worthless article like this one." what do you play in 1080p besides movies to tell that difference ???
You would literally need eagle eyes to tell the difference. People with 20/20 vision cant pick up those fine details from normal viewing distance, it's not possible by the human eye unless you have 20/15 vision. Now if you walk up to the screen and stare at it from close distance, then yes, there's a difference, but who watches a game like that? lol
$5,000 for a TV set that I can watch re-runs of "married with children" on?? Think I'll just spend the money on food.
Can someone tell me whether using your HD set as a computer monitor would affect this decision as well?
Chris, I bought a 46 inch Sharp, which I got on sale at a ridiculous price. What you forget to mention to the readers is that you really see the difference of high def, when watching sports events. You ever watch hockey in high def? It is insane, the picture is clear, you can pick up the sweat of a player. Also, what basketball or baseball in high def, and you will never want to go back to standard.
Speaking of TV, who is TONY SOPRANO and what happened to him? What's this all about?
I work in the video production world and I can safely say that it isn't worth the extra money. The thing that everyone forgets to consider is that the vast majority of stations are not even up to 720p or 1080i yet. While your picture is still a better quality, you are not getting the full spectrum that your HDTV is capable of just yet. Even after they do make the move to 1080p and you get a large amount of stations viewable in that format the difference will be very minimal. Don't be sheck shocked into buying something because of the projected greatness. With all HD needs it is safe to hold off until you are comfortable because the prices will come down. The ATSC tuner is a good idea, but you will eventually run into a format that even it will not recieve or convert. My advice is to stick with 720p/1080i for now.
I dont watch enought TV to justify spending more than $300 ina new set. My 17 year old RCA is just fine and I have no idea what resolution if any it has lol
I just bought a 46 Sharp Aquios 1080p at a very low price as well Watching sports in Hi-def is amazing on the TV I can't wait for football season
If you think your 1080p set is future-proof, you are wrong. If you really want to be about as future-proof as you can get, you should be trying to get a Television with a 15,000:1 Dynamic Contrast Ratio and HDMI 1.3 (for Deep Color). Then you need to find a HD-DVD and/or Blu-Ray player with HDMI 1.3 (and an Audio/Video receiver with HDMI 1.3). And go from a 5.1 set-up to a 7.1 set-up. You're going to end up spending a lot more than the $3,000 for the television. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000NVEG8S/ref=nosim/6580890-20 http://samsung.com/Products/TV/LCDTV/LNT5265FXXAA.asp http://samsung.com/Products/TV/LCDTV/files/lnt5265_final.pdf
obviously they havent been compared side by side by you if they had you would see a remarable difference in 1080i and 1080p even with an upcoversion but it still comes down to the consumer and how much they want to spend. I have sold and demonstrated these sets for over 5 years and there is a difference using they same video feed. The consumer has to decide and some people will swear there is no difference and if so thats fine it still is their money and their decision on how to spend or not to spend it on.
A lot of it has to do with screen size. I can tell a difference on my 62-inch, but I've seen both on screens of 40 inches or smaller and it's not at all noticeable.
the picture quality of the panasonics and pioneer plasmas and sony sxrd models will deliver a Quality picture, regardless of what the resolution (1080p/720p) you choose, go to the store and see the difference yourself. for those who buy the samsung, vizio, etc brands, well your going to have a lesser quality picture despite the resolution differences. i would take a 720p panasonic, pioneer, fujitsu or sony over ANY 1080p tv by any other brand simply because they have better blacks and colors---the picture quality is unmatched.
I THINK THIS HD TV STUFF IS GOING WAY OVERBOARD TO CONFUSE THE CONSUMER. WITH COMPRESSED SIGNALS FROM BROADCASTERS, SIZE OF TV, DISTANCE FROM THE TV, IT'S OVERATED. I CAN'T TELL THAT MUCH DIFFERENCE AS OF YET. TAKE THE WRITERS ADVICE GET WHAT LOOKS GOOD TO YOU FOR HOW MUCH YOU WISH TO SPEND.
Well 1080p is a much more advanced format than 720p or 1080i.The lcd's and plasmas resolution is defined by how many pixels are on that set. The lower amount of pixels increases any type of gap or flaw in the picture.A 720p or 1080i picture has 800,000 to1.2 Million pixels.A 1080p set has about 2.1 million pixels which means less gap and less flaw. Plus 1080p set have a quicker refresh rate and new panels that are 120hz which also improves the quality of the set. I have a 720p set but wish I had a 1080p set. Also remember HD is gonna look great even if 720 is what you want and can afford , if you go that way atleast you are experiencing HD.
MAN LAW? CAN SOMEONE HELP ME? Okay guys. I'm a female - but quite a sports nut! I just moved and I am in the market for a new, great TV that will do justice to my football and basketball games. The comments on here are as different as night and day! I would like a TV at least 32" that will do justice to my sports and give me great viewing for my movies w/o spending a bunch of dinero. Any suggestions? Feel free to mail me directly if you are a connoisseur of sorts! LOL. Thanks!
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 Posted by matt_archbold2002 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:11PM EDT Report Abuse
To me the diffrence between 720p and 180p is so small that i just stayed with my 46" 720p. I see no reason why you would need a 1080p anytime soon. The only thing playinjg in that resolution is the bluray player, and i am waiting to see which format is going to win the battle (ala beta max vs vhs). Anyone claiming that their 1080p tv is so much better is full of it because you cant tell with the sizes available and the only thing that you can use is the bluray. My advice it stick with 720p. It gives you hd but also doesnt break the bank.