How Much Is Windows Vista Really Worth?

Wed Sep 6, 2006 6:46AM EDT

See Comments (132)

Much has been said about how ungodly expensive Windows Vista is going to be, but what is it really worth? While software is rarely priced based on what it actually does, I figured I'd take a unique approach toward figuring out the real value of Vista, with a feature-by-feature analysis of how much the upgrades are worth to the user. Are there other ways to get the same features? How much do alternatives cost? Here's my blow by blow analysis of Vista's new features and what they're really worth:

  • Windows Aero - $20 - The new interface is pretty and all, but what's a bunch of fancy windows and 3-D effects really worth? Well, about 20 bucks, based on existing software like WindowBlinds, which lets you snazz up your GUI with eye candy. Though Aero doesn't actually do anything, it's still the most anticipated part of Vista and 20 bucks sounds about right for it. I'm also including the new version of DirectX in here.
  • Windows Shell and other under-the-hood upgrades - $40 - Though the underlying file system changes were stripped from Vista months ago, Windows Explorer gets an upgrade by letting users do more interesting things with filters and "stacked" files, which essentially lets you pile a bunch of related files on top of each other for easier sorting. Some of these upgrades seem really useful, like true thumbnails for all files, even text documents. The guts of the OS are of course radically upgraded too, which will hopefully lead eventually to greater OS stability. 
  • Integrated Search - zero - Free alternatives like Yahoo! Desktop Search and Google Desktop abound, and while some of Vista's search functions are helpfully tied into the OS, few people are going to use it for much more than finding documents.
  • Windows Sidebar - zero - Vista is late to the game by letting you add widgets to your desktop. Yahoo! Widgets has thousands to choose from, but with Vista you can get a couple of dozen. Woooo, a calculator!
  • Windows Mail - $5 - Replaces Outlook Express and looks nicer, most notably includes an upgraded spam filter that might actually not suck and promises less data corruption than Outlook Express.
  • Windows Calendar - $1 - I'm being generous. There are too many free calendar alternatives out there, but at least this will be integrated with Mail.
  • Windows Photo Gallery - $30 - Vista has put serious work in upgrading photo management in Vista. It's one of the OS's best new features, and users with a large number of pictures will probably love it. Alternatives like Adobe Photoshop Album are more expensive (and are still better than Photo Gallery), but this is a feature actually worth something.
  • Windows DVD Maker - zero - In 2007 you can finally burn a DVD movie with this bare-bones app, without venturing into Windows Movie Maker (which is also upgraded to support HD). Pretty useless. Free alternatives abound.
  • Windows Media Player 11 - $1 - Supports HD video, but otherwise is just cosmetically upgraded. I hate all the overhead of Media Player as it is and don't even use it.
  • Media Center Features - $20 - Now you don't need extra software or a special version of Windows to hook up TV tuners (two, even), or import HD video to your PC. Very useful for those who want it.
  • Internet Explorer 7 - zero - The beta has some cool features but they aren't worth paying for, especially considering nearly every website on earth looks broken when rendered by IE7. Alternatives are free.
  • Snipping Tool - $10 - A cool way to take better screenshots, and annotate them. I'll be using it for sure.
  • Windows Experience Index and Problem Reporting - zero - Lets you benchmark your system, test for stability, and optimize your PC, as well as letting you submit more detailed problem reports to Microsoft and track them. Frankly we shouldn't have to pay for this.
  • Windows Defender - zero - Integrated anti-spyware tool. It's already free for XP, as are alternatives. 
  • System Restore Upgraded - $5 - I like System Restore as it is, but this version seems a bit better.
  • New Windows Security Features - $1 - Will Windows really become more secure thanks to five years of "secure by design, secure by default" stumping? I doubt it. But at least they're trying, so here's a buck. Integrated drive encryption (called BitLocker) is a cool feature, but free alternatives are available.
  • Parental Controls - $5 - Not sure how well they work, but it beats adding in extra software which you'd have to pay for.
  • DRM - minus $10 - Vista is swarming with DRM software that will prevent you from doing all sorts of things you should be allowed to do. $10 penalty.
  • Various Other Junk - $5 - Stuff like Windows Meeting Space, upgraded Minesweeper (seriously), new fonts, and speech synthesis may be mildly useful, but probably not. Here's a five spot for the whole lot of junk that I haven't explicitly mentioned.

The final tally: $133.

Ironically, that sounds just about right. I mean, I'd totally pay $133 for Vista. I might even pay $199 so Microsoft could have $66 in mad money or to give its programmers a little vacation. Unfortunately, to get all of these features, you'll need to fork over $400 for Vista Ultimate Edition, a full three times what the OS is really worth. Better news: The upgrade is $260 (not $360 as previously reported), which puts us a little more in the ballpark, but still twice what it's really worth.

But that's just my analysis. You'll probably put your own values on certain core features of Vista that are different than mine. I'm sure parental controls are worth more to some, for example. I wouldn't be surprised if some of you value all of these upgrades at zero.

So what's your Vista value? Post it in the comments and let's see what it's really worth to you!

Comments on How Much Is Windows Vista Really Worth?

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 26 Posted by stevesm1994 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:43PM EDT Report Abuse

    i have 4 computers and all have xp and all will have xp untill absolulty neccessary

  • 27 Posted by leinair777 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 6:48PM EDT Report Abuse

    IMHO, Vista is to XP as WinME was to 98. A small upgrade for a big price. Whereas XP is to 98 as 95 was to 3.1. A decent price for a big upgrade. XP gave you much better file system (NTFS), stable enviroment, etc. Vista seems like Windows dressing. $40 max.

  • 28 Posted by ryanizzo on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:57PM EDT Report Abuse

    I'll pay $0 because hackers will be hard at work cracking Windows Vista, ensuring that millions of honest people and companies are forced to be gauged by Microsoft's blantantly over-inflated price.

  • 29 Posted by nl7zm on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:39PM EDT Report Abuse

    Vista is worth about $50 to me, no more. I don't like Microsoft's get it out and get the money in the till, we'll fix it later. I run Linux most of the time and haven't found it difficult to get most of the apps I want, and the cost is much less. It does not take a geek to use Linux.

  • 30 Posted by ian_em_preece on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:22PM EDT Report Abuse

    I won't be paying out any of my hard-earned pennies for Vista until at least the first flurry of "urgent updates" is over. MS are notorious for outsourcing their quality testing to their customers' machines... I try to impress on my customers that they shouldn't put Rev 1 (or 0) of anything, on a computer doing something important... But I anticipate another round of "I"ve got the very latest of everything and my business ground to a halt!" calls... ("Backup? Why would I need to back it up, I didn't update that bit..." )

  • 31 Posted by jackson_twobears on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:26PM EDT Report Abuse

    I wouldn't give you a nickel for VISTA. Microsoft is way off base on its price for this one. I'm running my office PC with XP and do not expect to up grade the OS until it (the PC) can no longer be repaired and I am forced to buy a new one. Why should I? I'm satisfied with what I have now.

  • 32 Posted by chrystopherpalms on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:25PM EDT Report Abuse

    this is just really ridiculous. i am a freshman in college, i worked 60 hour weeks alll summer to get the laptop of my dreams. for the money i spent, i'm not spending a dime on vista. maybe in four years when i buy a new laptop thats it. vista works fine for me anyway.

  • 33 Posted by bnax1 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:10PM EDT Report Abuse

    $50 bucks max why do we want to be limited by DRM why do we want our hardware slowed by an over bearing gui?

  • 34 Posted by kittenlittle@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:52PM EDT Report Abuse

    What's wrong with this picture when the operating system costs more than the computer itself (lot of standard PC's around for 399.00 on sale no including monitor)? Personally, I think they should stop making new versions until the old ones are pretty much bug free. Give me something that works reliably. So my final tally for Vista, -$1200.00 for all the work and time I've spent fixing things that Windows broke.

  • 35 Posted by coolcyrano on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:29PM EDT Report Abuse

    I am not sure I will pay $260 for the upgrade. I have started to use Ubuntu and love it for its driver support to devices and its developer friendly environment. The bigger pain with going to windows vista is to get all that extra hardware for your comp. Desktop wouldnt be a too much of a hassle but then upgrading ur notebook.. that might be a different story.. I dont think I would go to all that trouble unless I get a lot of good feedback about its compatibility.

  • 36 Posted by ogundipemuyiwa on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:43PM EDT Report Abuse

    This is a really dumb 'review' and most probably made by someone who hasn't tried vista. How can u compare the search feature in yahoo deskttop search and google desktop search? Neither would let you add tags and rate all documents would they? You didn't even mention the networking in vista which is awesome. I think vista really worths the hype.

  • 37 Posted by kgolia12 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:50PM EDT Report Abuse

    I already have the beta version of vista and its definately a nice upgrade....but no way i'd pay that much for it! the changes are great but unless you have an extra $400 lying around, i'd say sticking with your current windows is just perfecct!

  • 38 Posted by rstephenfitz on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:54PM EDT Report Abuse

    I gotta go with Zero. I like the XP system and I run it on 3 computers in my home. I'll upgrade when I need a new computer. The truth is that hardware has not made any serious leaps in 4 to 5 yrs so I don't anticipate needing anything new for quite some time.

  • 39 Posted by edgutz03 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:52PM EDT Report Abuse

    I am not going to give in to windows...they always dissapoint me!!!

  • 40 Posted by ayrton7 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:00PM EDT Report Abuse

    Linux does this + Office for free, and the price includes upgrades.

  • 41 Posted by schrage85 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:08PM EDT Report Abuse

    The value of vista to me is 10$ and that is only because of the compatibility to software. I d rather switch to a linux os there are many free versions that offer more than windows. IE 7 is a joke it has been in developement for a long time and still dont equal up to firefox or opera. The only way i would use vista is if it comes installed on a cpu i purchase or the software i need would work on nothing else. If not im sticking with ubuntu or any other form of linux. all the others extras are worthless because you can get better ones in freeware.

  • 42 Posted by chen_stellar2 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:22PM EDT Report Abuse

    To live in the area where MS's headquarter locate, and see how MS people works and live, I won't pay any money to MS.

  • 44 Posted by mtldiva2000 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:29PM EDT Report Abuse

    well folks, you all don't seem to understand that the top echelon needs to trade in their year old Lexus for the new hybrid version...........so all together now :)

  • 45 Posted by matthudson1 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:11PM EDT Report Abuse

    I will pay the cost because alot of newer software wont be able to run on anything but Vista, so MS is forcing you to upgrade if you want to use new software....but if you are already using VISTA RC 1 then it will be a little cheaper to upgrade when the full release version comes out....something to consider. To me its also worth it just to get DirectX 10, which i hear will only work on Vista, and since i use my computer for gaming, DirectX 10 is a must.

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.