Wed Sep 6, 2006 6:46AM EDT
See Comments (132)
Much has been said about how ungodly expensive Windows Vista is going to be, but what is it really worth? While software is rarely priced based on what it actually does, I figured I'd take a unique approach toward figuring out the real value of Vista, with a feature-by-feature analysis of how much the upgrades are worth to the user. Are there other ways to get the same features? How much do alternatives cost? Here's my blow by blow analysis of Vista's new features and what they're really worth:
The final tally: $133.
Ironically, that sounds just about right. I mean, I'd totally pay $133 for Vista. I might even pay $199 so Microsoft could have $66 in mad money or to give its programmers a little vacation. Unfortunately, to get all of these features, you'll need to fork over $400 for Vista Ultimate Edition, a full three times what the OS is really worth. Better news: The upgrade is $260 (not $360 as previously reported), which puts us a little more in the ballpark, but still twice what it's really worth.
But that's just my analysis. You'll probably put your own values on certain core features of Vista that are different than mine. I'm sure parental controls are worth more to some, for example. I wouldn't be surprised if some of you value all of these upgrades at zero.
So what's your Vista value? Post it in the comments and let's see what it's really worth to you!
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
IMHO, Vista is to XP as WinME was to 98. A small upgrade for a big price. Whereas XP is to 98 as 95 was to 3.1. A decent price for a big upgrade. XP gave you much better file system (NTFS), stable enviroment, etc. Vista seems like Windows dressing. $40 max.
I'll pay $0 because hackers will be hard at work cracking Windows Vista, ensuring that millions of honest people and companies are forced to be gauged by Microsoft's blantantly over-inflated price.
Vista is worth about $50 to me, no more. I don't like Microsoft's get it out and get the money in the till, we'll fix it later. I run Linux most of the time and haven't found it difficult to get most of the apps I want, and the cost is much less. It does not take a geek to use Linux.
I won't be paying out any of my hard-earned pennies for Vista until at least the first flurry of "urgent updates" is over. MS are notorious for outsourcing their quality testing to their customers' machines... I try to impress on my customers that they shouldn't put Rev 1 (or 0) of anything, on a computer doing something important... But I anticipate another round of "I"ve got the very latest of everything and my business ground to a halt!" calls... ("Backup? Why would I need to back it up, I didn't update that bit..." )
I wouldn't give you a nickel for VISTA. Microsoft is way off base on its price for this one. I'm running my office PC with XP and do not expect to up grade the OS until it (the PC) can no longer be repaired and I am forced to buy a new one. Why should I? I'm satisfied with what I have now.
this is just really ridiculous. i am a freshman in college, i worked 60 hour weeks alll summer to get the laptop of my dreams. for the money i spent, i'm not spending a dime on vista. maybe in four years when i buy a new laptop thats it. vista works fine for me anyway.
$50 bucks max why do we want to be limited by DRM why do we want our hardware slowed by an over bearing gui?
What's wrong with this picture when the operating system costs more than the computer itself (lot of standard PC's around for 399.00 on sale no including monitor)? Personally, I think they should stop making new versions until the old ones are pretty much bug free. Give me something that works reliably. So my final tally for Vista, -$1200.00 for all the work and time I've spent fixing things that Windows broke.
I am not sure I will pay $260 for the upgrade. I have started to use Ubuntu and love it for its driver support to devices and its developer friendly environment. The bigger pain with going to windows vista is to get all that extra hardware for your comp. Desktop wouldnt be a too much of a hassle but then upgrading ur notebook.. that might be a different story.. I dont think I would go to all that trouble unless I get a lot of good feedback about its compatibility.
This is a really dumb 'review' and most probably made by someone who hasn't tried vista. How can u compare the search feature in yahoo deskttop search and google desktop search? Neither would let you add tags and rate all documents would they? You didn't even mention the networking in vista which is awesome. I think vista really worths the hype.
I already have the beta version of vista and its definately a nice upgrade....but no way i'd pay that much for it! the changes are great but unless you have an extra $400 lying around, i'd say sticking with your current windows is just perfecct!
I gotta go with Zero. I like the XP system and I run it on 3 computers in my home. I'll upgrade when I need a new computer. The truth is that hardware has not made any serious leaps in 4 to 5 yrs so I don't anticipate needing anything new for quite some time.
I am not going to give in to windows...they always dissapoint me!!!
Linux does this + Office for free, and the price includes upgrades.
The value of vista to me is 10$ and that is only because of the compatibility to software. I d rather switch to a linux os there are many free versions that offer more than windows. IE 7 is a joke it has been in developement for a long time and still dont equal up to firefox or opera. The only way i would use vista is if it comes installed on a cpu i purchase or the software i need would work on nothing else. If not im sticking with ubuntu or any other form of linux. all the others extras are worthless because you can get better ones in freeware.
To live in the area where MS's headquarter locate, and see how MS people works and live, I won't pay any money to MS.
I would pay around $200.
well folks, you all don't seem to understand that the top echelon needs to trade in their year old Lexus for the new hybrid version...........so all together now :)
I will pay the cost because alot of newer software wont be able to run on anything but Vista, so MS is forcing you to upgrade if you want to use new software....but if you are already using VISTA RC 1 then it will be a little cheaper to upgrade when the full release version comes out....something to consider. To me its also worth it just to get DirectX 10, which i hear will only work on Vista, and since i use my computer for gaming, DirectX 10 is a must.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
26 Posted by stevesm1994 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:43PM EDT Report Abuse
i have 4 computers and all have xp and all will have xp untill absolulty neccessary