How Much Is Windows Vista Really Worth?

Wed Sep 6, 2006 6:46AM EDT

See Comments (132)

Much has been said about how ungodly expensive Windows Vista is going to be, but what is it really worth? While software is rarely priced based on what it actually does, I figured I'd take a unique approach toward figuring out the real value of Vista, with a feature-by-feature analysis of how much the upgrades are worth to the user. Are there other ways to get the same features? How much do alternatives cost? Here's my blow by blow analysis of Vista's new features and what they're really worth:

  • Windows Aero - $20 - The new interface is pretty and all, but what's a bunch of fancy windows and 3-D effects really worth? Well, about 20 bucks, based on existing software like WindowBlinds, which lets you snazz up your GUI with eye candy. Though Aero doesn't actually do anything, it's still the most anticipated part of Vista and 20 bucks sounds about right for it. I'm also including the new version of DirectX in here.
  • Windows Shell and other under-the-hood upgrades - $40 - Though the underlying file system changes were stripped from Vista months ago, Windows Explorer gets an upgrade by letting users do more interesting things with filters and "stacked" files, which essentially lets you pile a bunch of related files on top of each other for easier sorting. Some of these upgrades seem really useful, like true thumbnails for all files, even text documents. The guts of the OS are of course radically upgraded too, which will hopefully lead eventually to greater OS stability. 
  • Integrated Search - zero - Free alternatives like Yahoo! Desktop Search and Google Desktop abound, and while some of Vista's search functions are helpfully tied into the OS, few people are going to use it for much more than finding documents.
  • Windows Sidebar - zero - Vista is late to the game by letting you add widgets to your desktop. Yahoo! Widgets has thousands to choose from, but with Vista you can get a couple of dozen. Woooo, a calculator!
  • Windows Mail - $5 - Replaces Outlook Express and looks nicer, most notably includes an upgraded spam filter that might actually not suck and promises less data corruption than Outlook Express.
  • Windows Calendar - $1 - I'm being generous. There are too many free calendar alternatives out there, but at least this will be integrated with Mail.
  • Windows Photo Gallery - $30 - Vista has put serious work in upgrading photo management in Vista. It's one of the OS's best new features, and users with a large number of pictures will probably love it. Alternatives like Adobe Photoshop Album are more expensive (and are still better than Photo Gallery), but this is a feature actually worth something.
  • Windows DVD Maker - zero - In 2007 you can finally burn a DVD movie with this bare-bones app, without venturing into Windows Movie Maker (which is also upgraded to support HD). Pretty useless. Free alternatives abound.
  • Windows Media Player 11 - $1 - Supports HD video, but otherwise is just cosmetically upgraded. I hate all the overhead of Media Player as it is and don't even use it.
  • Media Center Features - $20 - Now you don't need extra software or a special version of Windows to hook up TV tuners (two, even), or import HD video to your PC. Very useful for those who want it.
  • Internet Explorer 7 - zero - The beta has some cool features but they aren't worth paying for, especially considering nearly every website on earth looks broken when rendered by IE7. Alternatives are free.
  • Snipping Tool - $10 - A cool way to take better screenshots, and annotate them. I'll be using it for sure.
  • Windows Experience Index and Problem Reporting - zero - Lets you benchmark your system, test for stability, and optimize your PC, as well as letting you submit more detailed problem reports to Microsoft and track them. Frankly we shouldn't have to pay for this.
  • Windows Defender - zero - Integrated anti-spyware tool. It's already free for XP, as are alternatives. 
  • System Restore Upgraded - $5 - I like System Restore as it is, but this version seems a bit better.
  • New Windows Security Features - $1 - Will Windows really become more secure thanks to five years of "secure by design, secure by default" stumping? I doubt it. But at least they're trying, so here's a buck. Integrated drive encryption (called BitLocker) is a cool feature, but free alternatives are available.
  • Parental Controls - $5 - Not sure how well they work, but it beats adding in extra software which you'd have to pay for.
  • DRM - minus $10 - Vista is swarming with DRM software that will prevent you from doing all sorts of things you should be allowed to do. $10 penalty.
  • Various Other Junk - $5 - Stuff like Windows Meeting Space, upgraded Minesweeper (seriously), new fonts, and speech synthesis may be mildly useful, but probably not. Here's a five spot for the whole lot of junk that I haven't explicitly mentioned.

The final tally: $133.

Ironically, that sounds just about right. I mean, I'd totally pay $133 for Vista. I might even pay $199 so Microsoft could have $66 in mad money or to give its programmers a little vacation. Unfortunately, to get all of these features, you'll need to fork over $400 for Vista Ultimate Edition, a full three times what the OS is really worth. Better news: The upgrade is $260 (not $360 as previously reported), which puts us a little more in the ballpark, but still twice what it's really worth.

But that's just my analysis. You'll probably put your own values on certain core features of Vista that are different than mine. I'm sure parental controls are worth more to some, for example. I wouldn't be surprised if some of you value all of these upgrades at zero.

So what's your Vista value? Post it in the comments and let's see what it's really worth to you!

Comments on How Much Is Windows Vista Really Worth?

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 46 Posted by tomlingenfield on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:15PM EDT Report Abuse

    Sounds good....Maybe it will come with a spell checker that many of you may find useful.

  • 47 Posted by acme0072004 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:45PM EDT Report Abuse

    i think it's only worth around 170 and upgrade should be 200 not 260. windows tries hard to do everything but you can't be good at everything.

  • 48 Posted by alexchou_ca on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:50PM EDT Report Abuse

    Buy an Apple. It comes with better OS and software, and hardware in a nice package, and it's not expensive anymore.

  • 49 Posted by jw_spencer2001 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:45PM EDT Report Abuse

    Well, considering that Apple now has the Mac Mini that you can plug a PC monitor into, plus any USB mouse/keyboard, now is the perfect time...

  • 50 Posted by dmcv on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:45PM EDT Report Abuse

    Looks to me like the author only listed Vista's improvements or extras over XP and other operating systems. (I don't see anything in there about the value of the base operating system.) That said, it doesn't seem fair to compare the author's total to the price of Vista. Instead, he should only be comparing his total to the price of the upgrade to Vista. Don't get me wrong, I still think the upgrade is overpriced, but the author's first comparison was like comparing apples to apple trees.

  • 51 Posted by jlreich32 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:36PM EDT Report Abuse

    If they would have left in all the cool features that was supposed to be in it in the first place, I think it would be worth $300. Regardless of whether or not they stole the ideas from Linux and/or Mac they would have made Vista a much better OS and worth a lot more. If it wasn't for all the DRM, I might actually consider using it as I do XP. Right now I have a basic setup with all other partitions hidden from Vista. No way will I let it even look at my other partitions! As it stands I would rather not pay more than $100 for it. I will only be getting it when my beta license runs out, and then only because I need to know it to be able to provide support for it to my customers. Thanks MS! Even if I do pay out $400, I will make that back many times over in the first year after release for fixing the inevitable problems on customers machines. :) Linux is free and getting better and better all the time. That's two thing MS has never been. Linux versions of programs will become more widespread before you know it. And by the way, most programs have very good, or better, FREE Open Source counterparts. For those that use high end programs for specific tasks, you should have a dedicated machine running for that purpose only. Most of the time there is no reason at all for that machine to even be connected to the Internet. BIG thumbs down for Vista.

  • 52 Posted by gwinaxath on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:15PM EDT Report Abuse

    I'll just pay $20 or $30 bucks for it at school, using our academic discount. I paid $10 for Win XP, $15 for Office 2003, and $25 for Visual Studio.net. Vista won't be much more than that. Well worth it in my opinion. If you have even the slightest ounce of computer knowledge, you can kill many of the parts that are useless. Have a nice day!

  • 53 Posted by smrick925 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:30PM EDT Report Abuse

    How about this, the average american consuemers computer is not powerful enough to suport the new vista? so people are going to go out and buy this program (which they do not OWN) and get home and a window is going to pop up and say " your computer will not suport windows vista" money wasted - end of story. Wait a few months go buy a brand new computer around christmas time and get vista in a package deal.

  • 54 Posted by medothegreat on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:14PM EDT Report Abuse

    The question is, how much did Microsoft have spent on research and development to produce this new OS? Would the company be loosing money if they sold it at $250, $200 or even at $150? Let us figure out how much MS paid its software engineers to develop this new OP. This is MS biggest expense. I do not think that the CD or the box that the software comes in has any considerable value. Once MS covers its biggest expense, (which the company will not have problem doing), the rest is pure profit. Think about how many computers will be upgrading to this new OS worldwide! Do you think Bill gate will have a problem covering up his expense. Why do think Bill Gate is the richest man on earth. MS did not have problem stacking up cash in the past. As long as people are welling to pay, the price is going to keep getting higher. It matter of supply and demand. People think. Does it REALY worth $400?????

  • 55 Posted by andthentherewasyael on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:54PM EDT Report Abuse

    i wouldnt even pay 5 bucks for that crap. ur basically paying 400 bucks for microsoft to add some colors and some more useless crap we really dont need.

  • 56 Posted by minnesotainventor on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:21PM EDT Report Abuse

    Excellent Article...love the way it was done! As a gamer...and devoted PC Gamer...Vista will be needed for the greatest of games. Will PC games or system ever be developed for multiple people on one PC like a gaming machine? We are moving more to the game machines for multiplayer experience with friends in same room. Always wishing Microsoft best of luck, we will all convert...I will sometime prior to their next OS release when most have Vista. WEBPAGES are broken views with VISTA "7"...how dare they...lot of time and money wasted with web design. They should fix it before releasing it. We view the internet with our eyes...why should VISTA change the view and make it broken? World is watching!

  • 57 Posted by x_cybernet_x on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:54PM EDT Report Abuse

    hahahah.. NO WAY im spending a dime on vista it rarely has any usefull plugins or upgrades heck it doesnt even have Xbox plugins windows xp is already trouble enough my computer almost crashed because windows update was ON my dad warned me that windows update was installing spikey software and i had to quickly put it off i'd rather get vista free of charge on the P2P servers.

  • 58 Posted by demi_dragon_boi on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:41PM EDT Report Abuse

    It's real nice that the people at Microsoft made the Vista more futuristic-looking than any of the previous versions. Media Player, however never seems to work for me, because it shows a person's music and videos to other people that have different user accounts on one Computer, making it worth virually nothing to some people.

  • 59 Posted by nuahs_2000 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:42PM EDT Report Abuse

    Zero! Why would I pay "X" amount of dollars for what I can already do! NEW, NEW, NEW, Who cares it already exists.

  • 61 Posted by losherwin on Thu Sep 3, 2009 6:57PM EDT Report Abuse

    MAC OS TIGER INTRODUCED US TO MANY OF THESE FEATURES A LONG TIME AGO. DON'T GET CAUGHT IN THE VISTA SCAM. EVERYBODY GET A MAC NOW!!

  • 62 Posted by carey_w_98 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:18PM EDT Report Abuse

    $400 (and $260 for that matter) is absolutely too expensive! I'll just wait till it's cheaper...like under $100. I can't afford it for anything higher! Honestly, for that price ($400) I can almost buy a new pc! Microsoft needs to get real, and get back in touch with it's consumers!

  • 64 Posted by post2lynn on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:16PM EDT Report Abuse

    How did you arrive at the -10 figure for the DRM? You should have subtracted WAY more than that!

  • 65 Posted by yitmy on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:56PM EDT Report Abuse

    Msft, I would be shorting it if the upgrades are basically a big nothing. I do agree it seems that the creative talent that developed windows may have been copying the mac and the Vista seems to be doing the same. Now if Mac/Apple can increase the units sold then maybe we will see big changes as the two operating systems go head to head. But lately MSFT has been just copying and not getting in any fiscal troube for it.

More Posts: First Prev 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.