Wed Sep 6, 2006 6:46AM EDT
See Comments (132)
Much has been said about how ungodly expensive Windows Vista is going to be, but what is it really worth? While software is rarely priced based on what it actually does, I figured I'd take a unique approach toward figuring out the real value of Vista, with a feature-by-feature analysis of how much the upgrades are worth to the user. Are there other ways to get the same features? How much do alternatives cost? Here's my blow by blow analysis of Vista's new features and what they're really worth:
The final tally: $133.
Ironically, that sounds just about right. I mean, I'd totally pay $133 for Vista. I might even pay $199 so Microsoft could have $66 in mad money or to give its programmers a little vacation. Unfortunately, to get all of these features, you'll need to fork over $400 for Vista Ultimate Edition, a full three times what the OS is really worth. Better news: The upgrade is $260 (not $360 as previously reported), which puts us a little more in the ballpark, but still twice what it's really worth.
But that's just my analysis. You'll probably put your own values on certain core features of Vista that are different than mine. I'm sure parental controls are worth more to some, for example. I wouldn't be surprised if some of you value all of these upgrades at zero.
So what's your Vista value? Post it in the comments and let's see what it's really worth to you!
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
I think you have it about right. I have been goofing around with the beta version and it just seems like a lot of smoke and mirrors
WHAAAATTT?! You would pay for this?! Why pay when you can get it for free if you know people in the right places? Seriously, it is so easy to find a copy and get around activation (it's called getting the corporate edition and a key generator). Ta dah!! Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate Edition = $0. Well maybe $0.50 if you take into account the cost of the DVD that you will have to first burn it to before installation. I win!!!
Christopher, I'm with you on the price. With all the upgrades I'm done over the last few years myself, I've already got Vista. Though I'll like to upgrade to the new duo processor with out having to buy a new computer. Wonder if thats worth the price?
wait... those of you who would pay this rediculous price for ms os should stop and think. every 3-5 years ms throws out another os filled with flaws and security loop holes, covered by minor cosmetic changes and people fall for it. its just their way of making you pay for their seriously flawed products. just look at 95/98/me, if vista doesn't sell or is too severely flawed, they'll just release another version and make all the consumers pay, again... ms' little social/economic test.
I have used a version of windows vista, it was the second beta release. My boss recieved a download from microsoft and he loaded it up on all our office computers. It is very user friendly, or would be if it actually worked right. Media player had scrambled lines through video and basically just felt like a re-vamp of windows media players already in use. We took the OS off our systems because the version we used was not compatible with nero or several other programs we use. So I just hope for $460 that they have solved the several issues that plagued the beta versions.
I've been using a beta version of Vista for a couple of months now. The security is a little overboard in my opinion, the user is presented with too many prompts and the average person will get very frustrated trying to disable some of these features. I know Windows XP in and out... and I had a bit of a challenge with the new layout. Also, there are still some software compatibility issues. I could learn to accept the price tag if some of the new features could run in the background and be easier to configure, the compatibilty issues will come in time. All software is overpriced.
There are so many things that this article does not include. Like the fact that he only lists the prices of Vista Ultimate. The cost of Vista Home Premium upgrade is suggested retail price for new (not upgrade) is $239.00 and the upgrade is $159 and that is with all the features that he mentioned. So he said that is was worth $133 so in the mind of the author it is over priced by $26 dollars. You can get the real prices and features from Microsoft from: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvista/ So will I upgrade? Yes when I buy a new computer and it comes with it. Will my company upgrade? I would like too, there are many security and remote features that come with the higher end OSs that makes running a network that much easier, but not until service pack 1 is out.
I won't pay much... maybe not even the $260. After a Microsoft Rep "demonstrated" Vista at my University, I wasn't too thrilled about paying sooo much money for what looks to be nothing more than a skin to the capabilities of XP... quite frankly, I really don't need a thumbnail to remind me what the file I created is all about. Additionally, the Microsoft Rep (who has worked nearly 20 years with the company) didn't know how to demonstrate some of the features of Vista. MY GOD!!! If a Microsoft Employee can't remember how to run the features of the OS, how does Gates & Co. expect me to? Furthermore, I'm not jumping out of my seat about Vista wanting to steal my Graphics Card's ability just to run the OS. I'm not shelling out the $260 for Vista or the $150-$300 for a new Graphics Card. I can only hope that Vista turns into another Windows 2000/Windows ME.
i feel that microsoft should take in consideration of people like me with good looks and not a lot of dough. furthermore i would enjoy to add many numbers together so i can find the money to buy this product that is absolutley meaningless to me, but i am an american and thats what we do.
Ok so I run Linux and I can promise you that all that stuff I can do on my computer for free. Some of that crap isn't even needed. I like the 133 dollar price. Although I think that it is too generous. Yeah I know Linux isn't for everyone but in a couple of years Linux will be readily available for all desktops and laptops. My laptop is 99% Linux compatible. --Jim
Yes, every PC needs an operating system. Windows used to be an enabler for the Microsoft Money Makers (read MS application software). But now Microsoft now also sees the OS as a money-maker... From a software design point of view, attaching lots of widgits to the core OS is really dumb--it only serves to lower reliability and makes adequate testing virtually impossible (the designers of real operating systems know this). Vista--as MS's new money maker--may be the thing that launches another desktop OS capable of running MS applications. Now, wouldn't THAT be interesting... I wonder how much vista would be worth if that happened?
I really think that it's all pretty sad. Most everybody is going to complain about the price and then purchase the product. This does not improve the situation at all. I say, leave the product on the shelf and live with what you have now. It's sending a message to Microsoft when the product doesnt move as quickly as they had anticipated. I'm not suggesting that we all band together and boycott the outrageousness of this. I'm just saying really do your research and make an informed decision on wether or not this new OS is worth it for you. If it's really not, then leave it on the shelf and keep what you have. Too many people are going to buy it because they don't know enough about computers to know that just because there is a new upgrade it doesnt mean they need one. However, anyone reading this is smart enough to know that. So use that knowledge.
From past experiences with different OS from Microsoft, I wouldn't pay $100 for Windows Vista. $400 is just way too much for a system that has already been hacked and people will continue doing it since there are so many errors in it. Updates and patches are going to be our by-weekly food from Microsoft. Good luck for those of you who are actually going to buy this software.
At home, W98SE is alive and well on my laptop and mini-tower. At work, XP is flexible and efficient. Everything works, for the most part (I still have to re-register VISIO everytime I want to use it), and I will never upgrade this equipment until the hard drives die. If my next machine (not a Mac) comes with Vista, then that's OK but only if it's bundled at no additional charge. The plug'n'play features of XP have been a good thing, and I hope they will continue to be enhanced and augmented as new stuff becomes available. Bottom line: I won't be spending anything for Vista, ever. You probably shouldn't, either.
Right now it's worth $0. It's rarely worth upgrading your existing OS until you get a new PC. Really, what features do you need? I ran 98SE for years until I built a new machine and finally got XP. Until the features of Vista are required by the software I'm using, there's no reason to upgrade a perfectly good copy of XP.
I would not buy Vista unless it just happens to come with a future computer. Personally, I would just run Linux if my laptop wasn't so fussy about it. An OS should be an OS, and applications should be applications. The OS should operate the hardware, period. At this point in the evolution of computers, there's enough good stuff out there to do anything with a PC, and it should just be incrementally improved (as already happens with Linux and other open source software). Why not just improve XP. Why do we need a whole new operating system every few years? What can you not do with XP and the appropriate applications today? Apple is just as guilty as MS as far as that goes. However, one thing that Apple did right is to make a clean break and switch to a real operating system. What we need is a solid, reliable, secure OS, and then we can all choose our own applications, whether that's commercial or open source.
As a user. $5, for shipping and creating cds/dvds. I am a linux user and I find it sufficient for all my work. Windows would be as insecure as it was ever. No matter, how much you support microsoft gives. Linux's whole source code is out in public and it is far more secure and robust than windows. Not to mention that all other applications, office, players etc. you get for free.
Hey, I forgot that Vista is a hardware beast. -$200 for that. I have to purchase new hardware and upgrade memory etc etc. That is costly affair. 2 GB of RAM, core 2 Duo, fitting motherboard. That is too costly.
Hey, I forgot that Vista is a hardware beast. -$200 for that. I have to purchase new hardware and upgrade memory etc etc. That is costly affair. 2 GB of RAM, core 2 Duo, fitting motherboard. That is too costly.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
66 Posted by kopek2675 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:53PM EDT Report Abuse
Well, i don't care too much. In the country where i am residing now, stuff like this will sooner or later come so cheap in no time. Thanks to piracy. Ahak ahak ahak....