How Much Is Windows Vista Really Worth?

Wed Sep 6, 2006 6:46AM EDT

See Comments (132)

Much has been said about how ungodly expensive Windows Vista is going to be, but what is it really worth? While software is rarely priced based on what it actually does, I figured I'd take a unique approach toward figuring out the real value of Vista, with a feature-by-feature analysis of how much the upgrades are worth to the user. Are there other ways to get the same features? How much do alternatives cost? Here's my blow by blow analysis of Vista's new features and what they're really worth:

  • Windows Aero - $20 - The new interface is pretty and all, but what's a bunch of fancy windows and 3-D effects really worth? Well, about 20 bucks, based on existing software like WindowBlinds, which lets you snazz up your GUI with eye candy. Though Aero doesn't actually do anything, it's still the most anticipated part of Vista and 20 bucks sounds about right for it. I'm also including the new version of DirectX in here.
  • Windows Shell and other under-the-hood upgrades - $40 - Though the underlying file system changes were stripped from Vista months ago, Windows Explorer gets an upgrade by letting users do more interesting things with filters and "stacked" files, which essentially lets you pile a bunch of related files on top of each other for easier sorting. Some of these upgrades seem really useful, like true thumbnails for all files, even text documents. The guts of the OS are of course radically upgraded too, which will hopefully lead eventually to greater OS stability. 
  • Integrated Search - zero - Free alternatives like Yahoo! Desktop Search and Google Desktop abound, and while some of Vista's search functions are helpfully tied into the OS, few people are going to use it for much more than finding documents.
  • Windows Sidebar - zero - Vista is late to the game by letting you add widgets to your desktop. Yahoo! Widgets has thousands to choose from, but with Vista you can get a couple of dozen. Woooo, a calculator!
  • Windows Mail - $5 - Replaces Outlook Express and looks nicer, most notably includes an upgraded spam filter that might actually not suck and promises less data corruption than Outlook Express.
  • Windows Calendar - $1 - I'm being generous. There are too many free calendar alternatives out there, but at least this will be integrated with Mail.
  • Windows Photo Gallery - $30 - Vista has put serious work in upgrading photo management in Vista. It's one of the OS's best new features, and users with a large number of pictures will probably love it. Alternatives like Adobe Photoshop Album are more expensive (and are still better than Photo Gallery), but this is a feature actually worth something.
  • Windows DVD Maker - zero - In 2007 you can finally burn a DVD movie with this bare-bones app, without venturing into Windows Movie Maker (which is also upgraded to support HD). Pretty useless. Free alternatives abound.
  • Windows Media Player 11 - $1 - Supports HD video, but otherwise is just cosmetically upgraded. I hate all the overhead of Media Player as it is and don't even use it.
  • Media Center Features - $20 - Now you don't need extra software or a special version of Windows to hook up TV tuners (two, even), or import HD video to your PC. Very useful for those who want it.
  • Internet Explorer 7 - zero - The beta has some cool features but they aren't worth paying for, especially considering nearly every website on earth looks broken when rendered by IE7. Alternatives are free.
  • Snipping Tool - $10 - A cool way to take better screenshots, and annotate them. I'll be using it for sure.
  • Windows Experience Index and Problem Reporting - zero - Lets you benchmark your system, test for stability, and optimize your PC, as well as letting you submit more detailed problem reports to Microsoft and track them. Frankly we shouldn't have to pay for this.
  • Windows Defender - zero - Integrated anti-spyware tool. It's already free for XP, as are alternatives. 
  • System Restore Upgraded - $5 - I like System Restore as it is, but this version seems a bit better.
  • New Windows Security Features - $1 - Will Windows really become more secure thanks to five years of "secure by design, secure by default" stumping? I doubt it. But at least they're trying, so here's a buck. Integrated drive encryption (called BitLocker) is a cool feature, but free alternatives are available.
  • Parental Controls - $5 - Not sure how well they work, but it beats adding in extra software which you'd have to pay for.
  • DRM - minus $10 - Vista is swarming with DRM software that will prevent you from doing all sorts of things you should be allowed to do. $10 penalty.
  • Various Other Junk - $5 - Stuff like Windows Meeting Space, upgraded Minesweeper (seriously), new fonts, and speech synthesis may be mildly useful, but probably not. Here's a five spot for the whole lot of junk that I haven't explicitly mentioned.

The final tally: $133.

Ironically, that sounds just about right. I mean, I'd totally pay $133 for Vista. I might even pay $199 so Microsoft could have $66 in mad money or to give its programmers a little vacation. Unfortunately, to get all of these features, you'll need to fork over $400 for Vista Ultimate Edition, a full three times what the OS is really worth. Better news: The upgrade is $260 (not $360 as previously reported), which puts us a little more in the ballpark, but still twice what it's really worth.

But that's just my analysis. You'll probably put your own values on certain core features of Vista that are different than mine. I'm sure parental controls are worth more to some, for example. I wouldn't be surprised if some of you value all of these upgrades at zero.

So what's your Vista value? Post it in the comments and let's see what it's really worth to you!

Comments on How Much Is Windows Vista Really Worth?

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 66 Posted by kopek2675 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:53PM EDT Report Abuse

    Well, i don't care too much. In the country where i am residing now, stuff like this will sooner or later come so cheap in no time. Thanks to piracy. Ahak ahak ahak....

  • 67 Posted by shanemelton2001 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:16PM EDT Report Abuse

    I think you have it about right. I have been goofing around with the beta version and it just seems like a lot of smoke and mirrors

  • 68 Posted by sai96115 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:59PM EDT Report Abuse

    WHAAAATTT?! You would pay for this?! Why pay when you can get it for free if you know people in the right places? Seriously, it is so easy to find a copy and get around activation (it's called getting the corporate edition and a key generator). Ta dah!! Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate Edition = $0. Well maybe $0.50 if you take into account the cost of the DVD that you will have to first burn it to before installation. I win!!!

  • 69 Posted by rpsoapy on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:53PM EDT Report Abuse

    Christopher, I'm with you on the price. With all the upgrades I'm done over the last few years myself, I've already got Vista. Though I'll like to upgrade to the new duo processor with out having to buy a new computer. Wonder if thats worth the price?

  • 70 Posted by tcyc00 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:58PM EDT Report Abuse

    wait... those of you who would pay this rediculous price for ms os should stop and think. every 3-5 years ms throws out another os filled with flaws and security loop holes, covered by minor cosmetic changes and people fall for it. its just their way of making you pay for their seriously flawed products. just look at 95/98/me, if vista doesn't sell or is too severely flawed, they'll just release another version and make all the consumers pay, again... ms' little social/economic test.

  • 71 Posted by sab623 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:59PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have used a version of windows vista, it was the second beta release. My boss recieved a download from microsoft and he loaded it up on all our office computers. It is very user friendly, or would be if it actually worked right. Media player had scrambled lines through video and basically just felt like a re-vamp of windows media players already in use. We took the OS off our systems because the version we used was not compatible with nero or several other programs we use. So I just hope for $460 that they have solved the several issues that plagued the beta versions.

  • 72 Posted by todd_harland on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:14PM EDT Report Abuse

    I've been using a beta version of Vista for a couple of months now. The security is a little overboard in my opinion, the user is presented with too many prompts and the average person will get very frustrated trying to disable some of these features. I know Windows XP in and out... and I had a bit of a challenge with the new layout. Also, there are still some software compatibility issues. I could learn to accept the price tag if some of the new features could run in the background and be easier to configure, the compatibilty issues will come in time. All software is overpriced.

  • 73 Posted by jennisonn on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:32PM EDT Report Abuse

    There are so many things that this article does not include. Like the fact that he only lists the prices of Vista Ultimate. The cost of Vista Home Premium upgrade is suggested retail price for new (not upgrade) is $239.00 and the upgrade is $159 and that is with all the features that he mentioned. So he said that is was worth $133 so in the mind of the author it is over priced by $26 dollars. You can get the real prices and features from Microsoft from: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvista/ So will I upgrade? Yes when I buy a new computer and it comes with it. Will my company upgrade? I would like too, there are many security and remote features that come with the higher end OSs that makes running a network that much easier, but not until service pack 1 is out.

  • 74 Posted by yeado02 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:55PM EDT Report Abuse

    I won't pay much... maybe not even the $260. After a Microsoft Rep "demonstrated" Vista at my University, I wasn't too thrilled about paying sooo much money for what looks to be nothing more than a skin to the capabilities of XP... quite frankly, I really don't need a thumbnail to remind me what the file I created is all about. Additionally, the Microsoft Rep (who has worked nearly 20 years with the company) didn't know how to demonstrate some of the features of Vista. MY GOD!!! If a Microsoft Employee can't remember how to run the features of the OS, how does Gates & Co. expect me to? Furthermore, I'm not jumping out of my seat about Vista wanting to steal my Graphics Card's ability just to run the OS. I'm not shelling out the $260 for Vista or the $150-$300 for a new Graphics Card. I can only hope that Vista turns into another Windows 2000/Windows ME.

  • 75 Posted by andrewpapula on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:54PM EDT Report Abuse

    i feel that microsoft should take in consideration of people like me with good looks and not a lot of dough. furthermore i would enjoy to add many numbers together so i can find the money to buy this product that is absolutley meaningless to me, but i am an american and thats what we do.

  • 76 Posted by kg4ysy on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:50PM EDT Report Abuse

    Ok so I run Linux and I can promise you that all that stuff I can do on my computer for free. Some of that crap isn't even needed. I like the 133 dollar price. Although I think that it is too generous. Yeah I know Linux isn't for everyone but in a couple of years Linux will be readily available for all desktops and laptops. My laptop is 99% Linux compatible. --Jim

  • 77 Posted by r0339 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:25PM EDT Report Abuse

    Yes, every PC needs an operating system. Windows used to be an enabler for the Microsoft Money Makers (read MS application software). But now Microsoft now also sees the OS as a money-maker... From a software design point of view, attaching lots of widgits to the core OS is really dumb--it only serves to lower reliability and makes adequate testing virtually impossible (the designers of real operating systems know this). Vista--as MS's new money maker--may be the thing that launches another desktop OS capable of running MS applications. Now, wouldn't THAT be interesting... I wonder how much vista would be worth if that happened?

  • 78 Posted by laydydragon81 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:57PM EDT Report Abuse

    I really think that it's all pretty sad. Most everybody is going to complain about the price and then purchase the product. This does not improve the situation at all. I say, leave the product on the shelf and live with what you have now. It's sending a message to Microsoft when the product doesnt move as quickly as they had anticipated. I'm not suggesting that we all band together and boycott the outrageousness of this. I'm just saying really do your research and make an informed decision on wether or not this new OS is worth it for you. If it's really not, then leave it on the shelf and keep what you have. Too many people are going to buy it because they don't know enough about computers to know that just because there is a new upgrade it doesnt mean they need one. However, anyone reading this is smart enough to know that. So use that knowledge.

  • 79 Posted by lover4ever_1 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 6:57PM EDT Report Abuse

    From past experiences with different OS from Microsoft, I wouldn't pay $100 for Windows Vista. $400 is just way too much for a system that has already been hacked and people will continue doing it since there are so many errors in it. Updates and patches are going to be our by-weekly food from Microsoft. Good luck for those of you who are actually going to buy this software.

  • 80 Posted by rdrainer on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:33PM EDT Report Abuse

    At home, W98SE is alive and well on my laptop and mini-tower. At work, XP is flexible and efficient. Everything works, for the most part (I still have to re-register VISIO everytime I want to use it), and I will never upgrade this equipment until the hard drives die. If my next machine (not a Mac) comes with Vista, then that's OK but only if it's bundled at no additional charge. The plug'n'play features of XP have been a good thing, and I hope they will continue to be enhanced and augmented as new stuff becomes available. Bottom line: I won't be spending anything for Vista, ever. You probably shouldn't, either.

  • 81 Posted by skinny0ne on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:26PM EDT Report Abuse

    Right now it's worth $0. It's rarely worth upgrading your existing OS until you get a new PC. Really, what features do you need? I ran 98SE for years until I built a new machine and finally got XP. Until the features of Vista are required by the software I'm using, there's no reason to upgrade a perfectly good copy of XP.

  • 82 Posted by subito_presto on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:46PM EDT Report Abuse

    I would not buy Vista unless it just happens to come with a future computer. Personally, I would just run Linux if my laptop wasn't so fussy about it. An OS should be an OS, and applications should be applications. The OS should operate the hardware, period. At this point in the evolution of computers, there's enough good stuff out there to do anything with a PC, and it should just be incrementally improved (as already happens with Linux and other open source software). Why not just improve XP. Why do we need a whole new operating system every few years? What can you not do with XP and the appropriate applications today? Apple is just as guilty as MS as far as that goes. However, one thing that Apple did right is to make a clean break and switch to a real operating system. What we need is a solid, reliable, secure OS, and then we can all choose our own applications, whether that's commercial or open source.

  • 83 Posted by smile_u2005 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:28PM EDT Report Abuse

    As a user. $5, for shipping and creating cds/dvds. I am a linux user and I find it sufficient for all my work. Windows would be as insecure as it was ever. No matter, how much you support microsoft gives. Linux's whole source code is out in public and it is far more secure and robust than windows. Not to mention that all other applications, office, players etc. you get for free.

  • 84 Posted by smile_u2005 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:28PM EDT Report Abuse

    Hey, I forgot that Vista is a hardware beast. -$200 for that. I have to purchase new hardware and upgrade memory etc etc. That is costly affair. 2 GB of RAM, core 2 Duo, fitting motherboard. That is too costly.

  • 85 Posted by smile_u2005 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:28PM EDT Report Abuse

    Hey, I forgot that Vista is a hardware beast. -$200 for that. I have to purchase new hardware and upgrade memory etc etc. That is costly affair. 2 GB of RAM, core 2 Duo, fitting motherboard. That is too costly.

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.