Thu Jun 14, 2007 6:52PM EDT
See Comments (12)
Reader Jim writes: How much of a difference does the contrast ratio on LCD TVs make? Is 8000:1 really that much better than 1000:1 for contrast, and worth the extra price?
Contrast ratio is perhaps the most misleading and overhyped data when it comes to televisions. In theory, contrast ratio measures the difference between the brightness in the super-bright portions of a screen vs. the super-dark portions. A 1000:1 contrast ratio would mean that a perfectly white pixel is 1000 times brighter than a perfectly black pixel.
That's the theory, anyway. The problem is that these brightness levels are hard to calculate, and they're subject to all sorts of interpretation. Ultimately, contrast ratio has become little more than marketing-speak, and the numbers are now largely meaningless. Things have gotten out of control to the point where various vendors have claimed 1,000,000:1 contrast ratios. It's getting to the point where escalating contrast ratios are now an industry joke, though not a very funny one.
Gizmodo has an extensive piece on the topic, which rightly points out that high contrast ratios don't mean high brightness. Rather, companies have focused more recently on decreasing the brightness of the "1" side: making the blacks blacker instead of the whites whiter. As the post notes, "Cutting the darkest dark on a screen by .5 effectively doubles the contrast ratio." In comparing an 8000:1 TV to a 1000:1 TV, you're probably looking at a TV that the manufacturer claims has richer, truer blacks.
Of course, it may not. The numbers could be calculated differently, inflated, who knows. You'll need an independent source (probably from a high-end home theater publication) to get a real sense of a TV set's contrast, but even then the numbers probably wouldn't be very meaningful because of the difficulties in performing such a test.
Ignore manufacturer's contrast levels and focus instead on how a TV looks to your eyes, whether it has the connections you need, and if it's the right size for your room.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
i personally think the other way..... specks is at least something you can compare.... i never trust the picture i see in a show room because they can adjust the picture to look really good on the expensive one and really crappy on the other and who knows what it will look like when you get it home... took a plasma back next day for that..
Most LCD monitors have a "focus" option built into their on-board menu, fooling around with this setting can easily fix any blurry pictures.
Also, try using a digital (e.g. DVI) video cable instead of VGA, as analog signals can be affected by nearby power cables (especially if your VGA cable isn't well-shielded), which can fuzzify the image a bit.
I just know that an LCD screen has look and feel of a monitor and the plasma has the crisp look and feel of a television. I spend far too much time looking at monitors. Once again I picked the superior technology, just as I did with beta VCRs, only to have the market veer off in an inferior direction. At least I understand why with betas (bad marketing strategy that exploded in their faces). Perhaps Panasonic will have the last laugh since there IS as the article says, a committed (if not exactly cult) following. And I'm lucky enough to have one of the few 37" plasmas for the spot I have that can accommodate only a 37" screen.
I still dont understand, what is the limit of the human eye? 1,000,000 to one? If that is that case then shouldnt it be the higher the number the better the TV?
A DVD can only give an output of 500:1 contrast ratio
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 Posted by cwb_558 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:33PM EDT Report Abuse
your are full of crap if you go look at like bestbuy you would see the difference granted 1,000,000 is a joke but 1000 and 15000 isnt