Flat-Screen TVs Sucking Down the Power

Tue Jun 19, 2007 11:36PM EDT

See Comments (132)

Back when LCD panels were first introduced as replacements for CRT computer monitors, they were heralded as not just a way to save space but a way to save energy as well: They used far less power and produced less heat than CRTs of the same size, which means buildings would spend less on air conditioning, too.

But as flat-panel technology moved to the television market, things started to change. Namely, LCDs and plasmas started to get a lot bigger than the largest CRTs available. Now you hear very little about power consumption of flat panels. I thought I'd take a look at how things have changed in recent years.

First off, it's actually quite difficult to find power consumption information for television sets. Very few vendors report the stats on their websites, and many bury them pretty heavily. (Tip: If you want to find the information reliably, look in the user manual on the specifications page, usually one of the last pages in the manual. Many manuals are online in PDF format now.) 

So how do CRTs, LCDs, and plasmas stack up? Here's some data on roughly similar size sets offered by the same vendors.

Philips has some of the most open power-consumption reporting, so let's start there. The company's 19-inch LCD consumes 60 watts, while its 20-inch CRT consumes 120 watts. Sounds good for LCD so far. But jump up to a 26-inch LCD and you're now at 120 watts, while the 27-inch CRT... still consumes just 120 watts. Whoa! JVC's 32-inch CRT consumes "140 to 150 watts" while its 32-inch LCD eats 159 watts. 

Beyond this level, things really start to get hairy. Of course, you can't find CRTs beyond this size any more, but Philips' 47-inch LCD consumes a whopping 290 watts and its 50-inch plasma eats up a mind-bending 400 watts! If you replaced a 26-inch CRT with that 50-inch plasma, you more than tripled your power bill on that outlet.

There's also the not-so-small issue of other equipment: No one likes a big picture without big sound. I realized I had no idea what my killer receiver's power consumption was, so I looked it up. The cost of 5.1 surround sound? 630 watts! A big plasma and a good receiver can easily eat up a full 1000 watts of power. In the UK, experts say the emerging problem could require another two nuclear power plants just to power the country's big TVs.

It's a big problem with few solutions aside from downscaling your home theater. But there's one decent option for those who want a big TV without a big power bill: Rear projection sets. JVC offers two 56-inch projection TVs with power consumption of just 215 to 240 watts. The technology may not be as exciting as the latest flat panels, but your wallet may be worth listening to on this one.

Comments on Flat-Screen TVs Sucking Down the Power

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by aprkareckas on Wed Jun 20, 2007 2:04AM EDT Report Abuse

    Very intereesting. It is a point we should all consider when we move up to bigger and bigger screens. Thank you for presneting this information.

  • 2 Posted by rukkosurfo on Wed Jun 20, 2007 2:42AM EDT Report Abuse

    Who cares...? It's exactly the same problem as with muscle cars. Weren't they extinct? Well, they reappeared exactly when prices of gas are at their peak. Big screens are becoming a dream por everyone, and no electricity bill is going to stop us, is it?

  • 3 Posted by sharikrishnan on Wed Jun 20, 2007 2:53AM EDT Report Abuse

    Vey useful Information indeed. Before investing for a LCD, I will definetly check the wattage now.

  • 4 Posted by tachikawa811 on Wed Jun 20, 2007 9:11AM EDT Report Abuse

    I just bought a 26" LCD to replace a 36" CRT. I asked and there was little or no info. unlike buying other appliances with Energy Star ratings like fridges, microwaves etc They let me look at the manuals which was about it. Buyers should consider the repercussions before buying into the super-sized 36"plus TV's/Ent systems... Theres not only the cost of the juice, but these things generate a lot of heat, consequently increased a/c costs. The strain this is putting on the nations grid is already becoming quite evident with the government having to establish Federal Energy Corridors to draw power from low population centers into high density areas like NYC and the mid-Atlantic, and existing coal-fire burning plants and nukes working OT to keep up w/demand.

  • 5 Posted by hingarfi on Wed Jun 20, 2007 10:44AM EDT Report Abuse

    You are correct about Rear Projection using less watts. The Mitsubishi 65" DLP uses 250W. I have a "100W / channel" 5.1 receiver which says the power consumption is 330W. I suspect this 330W usage only occurs when the receiver is driven to extreme volume. Mine "feels like it uses" about 100W at normal volumes. Crudely estimated by touching the cabinet have several hours of usage. That adds up to 350W at normal usage.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Post a Comment

 

Sign In to see your profile information, saved products and more...

Register Sign In

My Favorite Gadgets

 

Recent Activity

 

Recently Viewed

on | off on | off
 

Recent Searches

on | off on | off
 
 
 

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.