Why New Music Doesn't Sound As Good As It Did

Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:17PM EDT

See Comments (521)

Never mind that today's factory-produced starlets and mini-clones just don't have the practiced chops of the supergroups of yesteryear, pop in a new CD and you might notice that the quality of the music itself—maybe something as simple as a snare drum hit—just doesn't sound as crisp and as clear as you're used to. Why is that?

It's part of the music industry's quest to make music louder and louder, and it's been going on for decades, at least since the birth of the compact disc. Click the link for a nice little video, a mere 2 minutes long, which explains it in detail, with audio cues that you'll be able to hear in crisp detail.

The key to the problem is that, in making the soft parts of a track louder (in the process making the entire track loud), you lose detail in the song: The difference between what's supposed to be loud and what's supposed to be soft becomes less and less. The result is that, sure, the soft parts of a song are nice and loud, but big noises like drum beats become muffled and fuzzy. But consumers often subconsciously equate loudness with quality, and thus, record producers pump up the volume. Anything to make a buck.

The bigger problem is that this is all unnecessary. Stereo equipment is more powerful today than ever, and last time I checked, every piece of music hardware had a volume knob.

Don't take my word for it: Pop in the first CD you bought and play it at the same volume level as the most recent one you bought. You might be shocked by what you hear. 

Anyone still wondering why the music business is suffering? 

LINK: The Loudness War 

Comments on Why New Music Doesn't Sound As Good As It Did

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 26 Posted by jimfath on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:35PM EDT Report Abuse

    How about the sound being SUPER clean? Contemporary R&B, Country, and even some Rock sounds way too clean. The studio sound is so clean that many groups sound unrecognizable when you see them in person. Also many groups are terrible live because they're only good when a producer is sampling them and remixing them on the spot. The volume and over production of music is taking a sever toll on musicanship in popular music.

  • 27 Posted by thenukes on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:04PM EDT Report Abuse

    Author is right on the money. As a long-time audio engineer, it pains me to hear what happens to mixes in mastering these days.

  • 28 Posted by adamturtle2000 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:45PM EDT Report Abuse

    Why does everyone on this post sound like they: a - Listen to Dido b - Wank too much c - Is a tosser d - In a wheelchair e - Needs an actual life, not a second one

  • 29 Posted by bruce_campbellrulz on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:14PM EDT Report Abuse

    I don't care what they do to them, I just don't think cd's will ever have the fat rich sound that vinyl does. I pray that one day they can do that but I just don't see it happening. They are more concerned with making money than quality. Say what you want about being a dinosaur but I dare you to listen to Dark Side of the Moon on cd, then vinyl, and tell me there is not a vast difference! CD's just do not have that warm sound and it is a shame. Whether it is the technology or the cost, it just isn't there. Love the portability, not the quality!

  • 30 Posted by jimfath on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:35PM EDT Report Abuse

    How about the sound being SUPER clean? Contemporary R&B, Country, and even some Rock sounds way too clean. The studio sound is so clean that many groups sound unrecognizable when you see them in person. Also many groups are terrible live because they're only good when a producer is sampling them and remixing them on the spot. The volume and over production of music is taking a sever toll on musicanship in popular music.

  • 31 Posted by stubbywonder@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:45PM EDT Report Abuse

    Don't tell anybody... I still buy vinyl. If you take good care of it will last through the years and sound as good as or better than a new CD. It is a bit harder to find the new releases, but they are out there.

  • 32 Posted by jimmyewinkler on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:35PM EDT Report Abuse

    No, I do not wonder the music industry is suffering, the product/music sufers big time, IE the music inhales deeply and often. Jim Winkler Dallas, TX

  • 34 Posted by aiacovis on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:47PM EDT Report Abuse

    dawgfan_mike, I was going to say the same thing. The music industry is suffering because it keeps cramming pop down our throats. I absolutely loved the SACD of Dark Side and wish more musicians would follow the same "trend". As far as modern rock goes, anyone ever hear of the Bonaroo music festival down in TN. I've never been there, but I always love the lineup. That music is the music I love to listen to today.

  • 35 Posted by tjdadjplssoccer on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:12PM EDT Report Abuse

    That and they try to code the music all wierd to prevent copying and stuff, and when I do rip or just copy some for my mp3, they have weird distored sounds on them the same on the CD, but it's not hard to get a song and copy it so that's another worthless thing the recording studios do.

  • 36 Posted by epwspower on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:55PM EDT Report Abuse

    The thing is - most consumers will not notice the difference. That's why a small difference in quality is not a big deal to the companies.

  • 37 Posted by horkin_fiber_chunks on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:20PM EDT Report Abuse

    Short, sweet, and excellent article. The dumbing down of society reaches everywhere it can, "hard" subjects such as thought, dynamics, and an actual album instead of Greatest Hits collection of 4-minute-bits-of-trash are a thing of the past. The underground suffers much less from this thankfully, and is better music anyhow.

  • 38 Posted by maturemale999 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:11PM EDT Report Abuse

    A very interesting column except the cheap shot sentence, "Anything to make a buck". I assume Christopher belongs to some order of Monks and donates these columns to Yahoo!.

  • 39 Posted by scajetan on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:06PM EDT Report Abuse

    The one discerning factor I notice in music reproduced to CD's is where it is pressed; CD's from USA and EU always has the edge in recording from that which is pressed in my country Australia. It is very evident also from major retailer's here who tag them with stickers "IMPORT" and price them about A$10 more each. Well if they want us to stop downloading music and buy, they should give us quality.

  • 40 Posted by hndsmepete on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:19PM EDT Report Abuse

    Well that's why there are so many people out there ripping their old vinyl LPs to Lossless Wave files (bigger file, but it is an exact copy unlike MP3's which drop some frequencies & compress others). Basically they are making their own albums "Lossy" by turning up the volume in the mix, which compresses the sound frequencies & leaves you with something other than an exact copy of the original master. BTW Apple Lossless & Windows Lossless stink. FLAC, APE & SHN are the way to go.

  • 41 Posted by pete_buchwald on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:08PM EDT Report Abuse

    As a recording/mixing engineer I agree and disagree. Some stuff does sound better if it's squashed, and squashed with the right tools. So taking one example (like in your video demo), and adding compression doesn't prove anything. It has been common-knowledge in engineer circles that audio compression for commercial releases is out of control. A better article to write is to question the 44.1 K, 16 bit sampling CD standard. That would be a worthwile way to consider improving commercial CDs.

  • 42 Posted by sherylw9 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:19PM EDT Report Abuse

    This sort of thing is why I have a hard time listening to new music at all. It all sounds terrible to me because my hearing is so sensitive. I love the subtlety in a lot of older recordings and in more niche genres like classical and celtic which haven't been as butchered by the recording industries drive to cater to those who want to deafen themselves.

  • 43 Posted by bio_tube on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:08PM EDT Report Abuse

    To be honest, things like this don't surprise me. XCP pretty much made finding out whatever the record companies do a nonexperience. You get a question answered and move on. It's just a sad fact that most people don't care about quality anymore(why do you think rap's still around?).

  • 44 Posted by dehj311 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:40PM EDT Report Abuse

    1.) Vinyl is STILL the best way to go. 2.) If you're wondering why "today's" music sucks it's because there is no such thing as talent anymore in popular music and it's all driven by money hungry, talentless, morons. 3.) If you want good music - music that has a REAL message, music that posesses talent and soul, you HAVE to go look for it. You WILL NOT hear it on radio or see it on retard-driven MTV. Boycott public radio and MTV and MAYBE, JUST MAYBE, credibility will start to be restored to music!

  • 45 Posted by pete_buchwald on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:08PM EDT Report Abuse

    As a recording/mixing engineer I agree and disagree. Some stuff does sound better if it's squashed, and squashed with the right tools. So taking one example (like in your video demo), and adding compression doesn't prove anything. It has been common-knowledge in engineer circles that audio compression for commercial releases is out of control. A better article to write is to question the 44.1 K, 16 bit sampling CD standard. That would be a worthwile way to consider improving commercial CDs.

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.