Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:17PM EDT
See Comments (521)
Never mind that today's factory-produced starlets and mini-clones just don't have the practiced chops of the supergroups of yesteryear, pop in a new CD and you might notice that the quality of the music itself—maybe something as simple as a snare drum hit—just doesn't sound as crisp and as clear as you're used to. Why is that?
It's part of the music industry's quest to make music louder and louder, and it's been going on for decades, at least since the birth of the compact disc. Click the link for a nice little video, a mere 2 minutes long, which explains it in detail, with audio cues that you'll be able to hear in crisp detail.
The key to the problem is that, in making the soft parts of a track louder (in the process making the entire track loud), you lose detail in the song: The difference between what's supposed to be loud and what's supposed to be soft becomes less and less. The result is that, sure, the soft parts of a song are nice and loud, but big noises like drum beats become muffled and fuzzy. But consumers often subconsciously equate loudness with quality, and thus, record producers pump up the volume. Anything to make a buck.
The bigger problem is that this is all unnecessary. Stereo equipment is more powerful today than ever, and last time I checked, every piece of music hardware had a volume knob.
Don't take my word for it: Pop in the first CD you bought and play it at the same volume level as the most recent one you bought. You might be shocked by what you hear.
Anyone still wondering why the music business is suffering?
LINK: The Loudness War
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
I've heard this story before, and it makes me glad that I still listen to vinyl and open reel tape. Forget the convenience factor, records and tape still smoke cd's. It has nothing to do with accuracy, and a lot to do with aural processing/perception, imho. One of the inherent problems with cd's is the fact that if you look at a sine wave of an analog source, as opposed to, a digital source, the sine wave for the cd is square (those corners are clipping off the music), whereas, if you look at an analog source, you'll notice that the sine wave is rounded (including all of the recorded output). The quality of todays new vinyl, tables, tonearms and cartridges, has reached a new height in music reproduction. I will stand analog against digital any day. Most everyone bought the lie,' perfect sound forever'. Which also brings up the point that most people don't LISTEN to music. It's only for background, or worse yet, ambient noise. We've also gotten quite lazy. We don't want to take care of our toys, no matter how expensive they are, hence, the cd revolution. Albums short playing times, pops, ticks, scratches, are just an excuse,or a weak reason to buy into a new technology that is inherently flawed. We've gotten what we've bought into and paid for. If I want it loud, I'll turn the volume knob to the right. I don't need the mastering engineer to do it for me. That also begs the response that 85% of today's popular music is dreck. It speaks nothing, and it is not supposed to. All it is supposed to do is garner revenue. Anything else?
The over-compression of music dates back to the early '90's when metal bands like Metallica started doing it. Everything sounds the same because it's all been put through compressors so that the volume can be raised without distortion. Listen to an older CD of AC/DC's "Back In Black" side by side to the newer reissue. The difference is stark.
I DON'T WANT TO SOUND LIKE I'M AN OLD MAN. BUT I GREW UP LISTENING TO VINYL. I FEEL THAT THE CD SOUNDS 'PHONEY'. I ALWAYS FELT THAT WAY. VINYL HAS A NATURAL WARM SOUND, AS WELL AS TRUE BASS. A CD, BECAUSE IT'S DIGITAL, CANNOT PRODUCE NATURAL LOW END BASS. THAT'S WHY ON EVERY CD PLAYER, IT HAS 'HEAVY BASS' SETTINGS. CERTAIN INSTRIMENTS, AND OR CLEAR SOUNDS, OR EVEN VOICES, ARE NOT SOMETIMES HEARD ON CD'S. ALSO VINYL WAS SLOWER, AND MORE EXPENSIVE TO PRODUCE. THE COSTS WERE REASONABLE. YOU CAN GET A CAN OF BLANK CD'S FOR ABOUT $5.00 BUCKS FOR 20, ON SALE. WHY IS THE PRICE SO HIGH WHEN THEY ARE VERY CHEAP TO PRODUCE? ALSO,VINYL, WHEN KEPT PROPERLY, WILL BASICALLY LAST FOREVER. A CD, WILL DETERIATE IN 15 YEARS. THAT'S A FACT FOLKS. I'M JUST GLAD TO SEE THAT SOMEONE ELSE HAS NOTICED. BECAUSE, I THOUGHT THAT I WAS THE ONLY ONE.
I should invest in hearing aids.This current generation will be needing them before they are 40.
Artist today think they can make a hit out of any little tune they come up with. Now a days, you could sing Little Boe Peep with a little beat in the background and it'd be a hit. I'm only 15 but I can tell that today's music isn't all it should be. Cussing and talking trash about other artist isn't cool as in nice but isn't cool as in popular and worth listening to. If you know what I mean. But artist can't just take beats/words/both from older and even better music. It just shows how unoriginal they are that they have to take what other artist came up with and made hit out of. And people say, 'Oh that sounds so great!' well you should listen to the original version and it sound so much better.
what this writer is failing to bring into the discussion is most of the first cd's were merely lp masters. if this guy new anything about mastering he would know for starters volume and lp's didn't really go together, nor did heavy bass ( the more bass you have the wider the groove the less music you can fit on lp). it;s apple and oranges, another point is he's talking about two different things, masters and unmastered mixes. maybe he doesn't realize that the mastering engineer has control of final volume but if the artist delivers a loud mix what is the mastering engineer to do?
I agree to, that when people add so much compression then boost the overall level to "CD" level, we're asked all the time to make it louder, maybe because everyone has to listen to everything at extreme levels to believe that is sounds good, I JUST DON'T GET IT ! WHAT I CAN'T HEAR YOU?!
My first thought was to disagree with what I read, but after viewing the short 2 minute video, there's no denying it. Or course there are exceptions. Some artists are extremely picky about sound and produce music that is of the highest sound quality. While the group may be questionable, Korn's last release was recorded so clean and clear, it may be the best sounding disc I own (musically it's a disaster though). It's a quick article and is very interesting...
They loud music of stadium shows and a booming car system have left me deaf in both ears. I recently paid $4000 inorder to be able to ear my children speaking to me. Absolutely please encourage your children to turn the volume down, especially with those ear buds. I think I will go into hearing aid business.
I think you guys are a little confused. I don't believe that the music industry is trying to make things louder and louder. I think you've sort of missed the entire point. The music industry wants to make fast cheap industrial music that doesn't require hi fidelity equipment to PLAY it on. They have been dumbing down the sound and the equipment for years now. What you are sensing is a particularly noticable LACK of DYNAMIC RANGE which is what happens when you take REAL sound and turn it into something that cannot occur in nature. COMPRESSED sound. Mp3s HAVE no dynamic range. (relative to their distant long playing record cousins.) Until people stop paying good money for recordings that mimic the sound quality of your ancient phone answering machine, the record industry is going to continue to SELL them to you.
I think we're all caught up in the recording process and losing sight of the songs and feel ingeneral. Unless you're dealing with classical music, etc. we have forgotten that it's not supposed to be perfect. It's supposed to have nuances, feel , emotion. This is rock and roll, or whatever, what happened to the fun. I like Bob Dylan's approach to recording. " It's how it sounded at the time " He does a couple of takes. PERIOD. The Beatles did 4 songs in a day. With all todays equipment we can barely get 4 songs a month. Why does it take a year to "master" a song. No one will EVER hear it in that same environment anyway. Mowtown mixed on cheap car speakers because that's where most of the music would be heard. Digital has obvious advantages but it's making everything sterile. We need the MUSIC back in music. Thanks for letting me vent. Even most indie artists don't sound exciting anymore. Plenty of GREAT musicians out there but no great SONGS. Heck, there aren't even instruments on a lot of songs today, just mouse clicks. What gives. Make a mistake fix it on pro tools. Why not try and get the part down right, or leave in the mistake. Listen carefully to older stuff. There's plenty of mistakes - they're kinda cool. We could go on about live shows to but what's the point. Better is NOT always better. Who agrees???
pick up an instrument, learn to play. sing. music is for people to have fun together.
I love how people always try to say that bad music is caused by things being on CDs. No it's not. It is because most of todays artist are mediocre singers, the melody is pretty weak, and other stuff about the composition. It has nothing to do with bit depths and other technical crap.
The music industry has changed so much in the past five years that traditional music producing is no longer acceptable. The rules are different and unless performers and producers realize this they will be left in the dust. Online radio has already changed the face of music. If you are interested in a career in online radio check out the Radio Connection. They match you with a mentor which specializes in your area of interest, whether is is electronica, Djing, hip hop, or talk radio. http://www.radioconnection.com for more info !
Not sure if it's been mentioned but the comment about Classical music is dead wrong. A very high percentage of Classical musicians have Tinnitus and their audiences too.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
506 Posted by ashen.lady@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:58PM EDT Report Abuse
Most of what you're hearing is thanks to a process called compression, which happens during the mastering process of the album. Compression evens out the levels of the tracks making it not only easier to play loud on a home stereo, but for a radio station to pump it out as loud as possible. Radio stations also add some compression as well as iTunes (import The Clash's "Guns of Brixton into your iTunes, you'll find that the bass line, which carries the song, is all but lost). The compression that happens in the radio station keeps sounds above or below a certain level from passing throught via gates and thresholds. Yet, it goes farther back to the recording process, where the instruments are recorded at the loudest volume possible before distorting (what is called clipping). When a track gets clipped, or "too hot", distortion happens and it needs to be re-recorded. All of this factors in to the "too loud" sound albums have taken on today. And I totally agree with whoever said listen to The Bad Plus. All of their albums are skillfully recorded and produced, not something you see everyday. Also, this is not the major factor in the demise of the music industry.