First Intel Quadro Quad-Core CPU Analysis

Tue Sep 12, 2006 1:38PM EDT

See Comments (8)

If it feels like Intel's Core 2 Duo CPU just came out, that's because it did! And yet Intel is already hard at work on a quad-core chip (that's four cores, folks) possibly slated for release later this year (no date has been announced).

Tom's Hardware somehow got its mitts on a the Core 2 Quadro, as it's currently known. The good engineers there put it through its paces, and to spare you from having to read through their 15-page analysis of the chip, here's a summary of the good, the bad, and the technical mumbo jumbo.

  • The four cores are not on the same piece of silicon but are on two dies sitting next two each other inside the CPU casing.
  • It's a power hog: 95 more watts at maximum load than a Core 2 Duo Extreme system and power use in line with an old Pentium EE. This might present a problem down the line.
  • It's also "clearly hotter," about 50% hotter than a Core 2 Duo.
  • Not all applications are ready to deal with four cores... expect some headaches and apps that won't run (or run very slowly).
  • On the whole: Record-breaking performance! (Of course.)
  • The details: High-end gaming performance but only at the very fastest clock settings; multimedia apps like music encoding considerably faster; general apps like virus scanning can be much faster. Performance is highly application specific, probably due to how well the program is coded to handle hyperthreading (the precursor to multicore CPUs). In the best case, performance can be double that of Core 2 Duo.
  • The chip shines at multitasking. (In theory, each core can handle it's own applications, so you should see fewer lags and delays when running multiple programs. This is already the case with dual core chips, but who only runs two programs?)
  • You're gonna pay a lot for this muffler: $1,000 for the high-end CPU.

That's a lot to digest, but here's the bottom line: Quadro will be blazing fast for most applications (though not all) yet very expensive. Expect some bugs, and some growing pains, as programmers slowly migrate to thinking about their apps in multicore mode. This is also probably the end of the line for a while when it comes to multicore madness. Squeezing eight cores into one chip package just isn't feasible with current production technologies, so expect 4-way to be the state of the art for the next year or two.

More news as it develops!

Comments on First Intel Quadro Quad-Core CPU Analysis

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by rondhugo on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    It is a good thing that multi processor is on its way. The bad side is wise buyers may be reluctant to try until the products has gained popularity. We are in an era of technological deception wherein the winners are always big companies who are always driven by profit. My advise do not buy until you needed the added functionality of the product.

  • 2 Posted by kool_man97 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:53PM EDT Report Abuse

    Intel's gone overborad With it's "quad core" They shold leave with serers if going quad core Or Hard in video gamers. Next thing you know they are going to do 8 Cores or 6 .

  • 3 Posted by kristiepand on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:53PM EDT Report Abuse

    Wow, what an awesome product! I am going to buy one right away. Intel makes the best products.

  • 4 Posted by campbelltoe on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:17PM EDT Report Abuse

    Seriously...I agree with Kristiepand...this product is so technologically advanced and worth the $$$. It out-performs every other competitor product hands down. Hard to believe the negativity of the posts considering the positive direction quad core is leading the computer industry. Check it out for yourselves...it's worth investigating.

  • 5 Posted by campbelltoe on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:17PM EDT Report Abuse

    I completely agree with Kristiepand...Quad Core is so ahead of the game it's ridiculous. I'm surprised by the negativity of some of the posts, considering the positive direction Intel is leading the technology sector. I own one, and definitely advise those in disbelief to try one out themselves...it's worth the time and definitely worth the $$$.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.