Who Really Has the Largest Cellular Network?

Thu Sep 14, 2006 1:36PM EDT

See Comments (559)

You've seen the commercials. You've heard the debates. You can't go a week without hearing Verizon Wireless, Cingular, or Sprint claim to have the biggest or fastest wireless network in America... or sometimes all three of them!

So who's right? Who really does have the biggest cellular network in the U.S.? I put the question to the big three networks to find out how they make their claims and what data they had to back it up. (And while I love T-Mobile as much as anyone, its network is decidedly smaller in both coverage and number of subscribers, nor do they make such grandiose claims, so it was originally excluded in this survey (update below).)

For starters, you'll see that no carrier claims to have a larger network based on actual geographic coverage (except Alltel, see below). In fact, no carrier even seems to know how much square mileage its network actually covers. It just isn't measured, and that data doesn't exist.

What cellular carriers use instead is a measurement of the total number of people who are physically located in the service area of the carrier. The total number of people who can reach the network is how carriers make claims about the size of their coverage; presumably the more people you can reach, the more physical ground you cover, but that's not necessarily true.

Obviously, more people live in urban areas than in rural ones, so all carriers focus their efforts on reaching the most people where they live. Rural coverage exists, but there's no way to easily tell whether one farm or another is going to have coverage aside from looking at a coverage map in detail.

With that in mind, here's what the networks said—this is all from their own mouths; I'm not spinning the information at all—about their wireless service (in the order they returned my calls).

Cingular
Cingular's standard GSM voice service reaches 270 million people, and its 2.5G EDGE service (a service that's a bit faster than GSM) reaches 250 million potential people. Cingular's 3G HSDPA service reaches 70 million people in "80 to 90 cities" and covers 40,000 miles of highway. Cingular also points out that its network is all-digital and has no analog roaming, making it the largest all-digital network in the U.S. Since it's GSM, you can also take your phone worldwide (with voice service in 200 countries and data service in 100), which you can't do with CDMA networks like the other two carriers have.

Verizon Wireless
Verizon offers standard voice coverage to 291 million potential people if you include its roaming partners who provide service where Verizon does not. If you discount the roaming partners and just include towers owned and operated by Verizon, coverage is 255 million people. Verizon's 3G EV-DO network reaches 150 million-plus people. Verizon also claims to have the largest network by number of subscribers: 52.6 million retail subscribers and 54.8 million if you include resale/rebranding agreements with other carriers. Verizon also notes that J.D. Power consistently ranks Verizon as having the highest overall call quality on the market, along with T-Mobile. Verizon also claims to have the most reliable network in the States, based on a variety of third-party studies.

Sprint
Sprint's standard voice service reaches more than 295 million people (including U.S.-owned islands like Guam), and the Nextel iDen network reaches 264 million people. Sprint's 3G EV-DO network reaches 158 million people in 220 markets with more than 100,000 residents and 486 airports. Sprint's recent claims are that its broadband service is 5 times faster than Cingular's, but this is comparing to Cingular's old 2.5G EDGE service and not its newer 3G service (which has a comparable speed). Technically speaking, Sprint suprisingly has the largest amount of coverage.

Alltel (updated 10/2/06)
Here's what Alltel (finally) says: Alltel has 11 million customers and cover 72 million potential customers. "Our network covers more square miles nationally than any other carrier's network—hence we are the largest network." When I asked how the Alltel network could be larger geographically but cover less than a third of the population that the other carriers do, Alltel said, "There is no tie between pops [people covered] and network coverage... our build-out network covers more square miles than any other carrier's... pops really pertains to population in a licensed area." It seems to me that there actually is a strong tie between the geographic size of the network and the number of people living inside that area. And since no other network actually even measures the size of its network geographically, I have to take these claims with a grain of salt.

T-Mobile (updated 10/3/06)
T-Mobile got back to me with this information: T-Mobile reaches 275 million people in the U.S. and has 23 million customers. The company didn't offer information about how much of its coverage is through its own network vs. its affiliates.

And that's the scoop!

So who's got the biggest network? If you compare geographic coverage maps, it sure looks like Verizon, but Sprint genuinely seems to cover more people, if by a small margin, with both voice and high-speed data. (Those coverage maps are hardly standardized, so it's tough to draw conclusions based on them.) Cingular, however, does have an advantage by having more digital service. Analog roaming, common in rural areas, can be expensive and buggy, and many phones simply don't have analog radios at all any more. Cingular's international support is also worth noting. Then there's Verizon: Those call quality claims are hard to ignore and are probably more important to most users than a few extra towers out in the boonies.

Bottom line: All three networks are suitably large for more than 99 percent of U.S. users. Unless you frequent parts of Montana near the Canadian border, you shouldn't experience dead zones more than once in a blue moon. My recommendation: Find a phone you love and a plan you can afford and give it a try near where you live, but don't worry too much about who's providing the service.

Note: This does not mean that all three carriers are equally appropriate for every mobile phone user, but that, on average, they all have coverage that spans most of the country. Check out this post for more help on how to choose a cellular carrier.

Comments on Who Really Has the Largest Cellular Network?

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 546 Posted by spikedboy2003 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:36PM EDT Report Abuse

    I personally have Verizon and rarely have any calls drop. My friends all have T-Mobile or Cingular in the Seattle area and their calls are always dropping. Cingular can make any claim they want, but how can you trust a company that keep switching their name from Cingular to AT&T, and vice versa. I suppose it will be back to Cingular within 6 months. Sounds like a ploy to make their customers upgrade their phones and renew their contracts because everyone is leaving for Verizon.

  • 547 Posted by marycolomer on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:10PM EDT Report Abuse

    I've had Verizon Wireless for about 6 years. I absolutely love it. I get coverage everywhere, even in elevators. The only time I get dropped calls is when the OTHER person's carrier drops the call. I've also used the LG brand phones for 6 years. I had a friend that worked for Verizon when I signed up & he told me that LG was the best phone to use with Verizon service.

  • 548 Posted by cynthiaannettesmith on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:33PM EDT Report Abuse

    You all should know that the quality of your phone has as much to do with the quality of your service as the the provider. With the exception of Nokia phones, cheaper phones mean lower quality signal. Spending just a little more whe purchasing to get a better phone with better reception will hugely improve almost anyone's satisfaction with almost any provider. The exception of course is the coverage for T-Mobile. I've had Nextel, Alltel, Verizon, AT&T and Cingular - separately pre-combination, and Sprint. They all have areas where there are dead zones but Alltel and Verizon BY FAR had the fewest. Now I never had the cheap phones...

  • 549 Posted by tumblejack on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:23PM EDT Report Abuse

    I live in Georgia, and in my personal experience, I've found that Alltel or Verizon is the way to go for sheer geographic coverage. I go with Alltel since Verizon has such awful customer service. NO carrier has seamless coverage. Anybody who has never had a drop in coverage is somebody who either doesn't really travel, or they don't pay much attention to their phone while they're travelling. Here, Sprint, T-Mobile, SunCom, and others tend to be good only if you live within the bounds of a major city and don't travel much. I tried Cingular years back, and despite the then-availability of dual band phones, they sent me a GSM-only phone, and it was a disenchanting experience to say the least. Because they wouldn't work with me to get a better phone, I had to end services with them. I've considered going back if I can get enough good testimonial from those in my neck of the woods using Cingular's newer tri or quad-band phones, but until then, Cingular's use of GSM as their primary protocol is discouraging to me. I welcome anybody in Georgia or the Carolinas with one of the the a late model offerings from Cingular to post their experiences. -Jack

  • 550 Posted by boomslice on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:11PM EDT Report Abuse

    Verizon is the best, I just wish they had better phones. Their phones are a little dorky, but the service is great, I get a signal everywhere and the calls are always clear. Also, unlimited texting and with teenagers this is a must!

  • 551 Posted by handofdeath2288 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:15PM EDT Report Abuse

    Verizon has bin the best friends have the other ones and more times then i could count it my fone that works the only thing verizon has to work on is there customer service once they fix that they will be the best

  • 552 Posted by djsallee@att.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:44PM EDT Report Abuse

    We loved T-mobile until they sent us a letter in May of 2008 saying that since we roamed over 80% of the time, they were canceling our contract and had until June 22nd to find another carrier and they wouldn't charge us the early termination fee. WELL THANKS FOR THAT! So we went to Verizon and have been just as happy....but T-Mobile KNEW where we lived and still gave us service wiether we were roaming or not...only to cut us off because of it!

  • 554 Posted by navytech@nvbell.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:34PM EDT Report Abuse

    I am an engineer for AT&T and can confirm that Cingular/AT&T is definitely pressing hard on adding new towers as I have had complete several jobs for new towers in my designated areas. Sprint seams to have slowed down and Verizon is keeping up with AT&T for new sites.

  • 555 Posted by jeffreybonkers on Sun Aug 16, 2009 3:10PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have cingular and until recently have had no problems with their service. Don't know if it's the fault of the phone I use LG Shine or Cingular. On a recent trip to Branson, Mo. I had terrible signal and coverage. other spots that i usually have no problems with making calls would lose signal and calls would be drop. considering changing carriers.

  • 556 Posted by griessinthewood on Fri Sep 18, 2009 9:27PM EDT Report Abuse

    this says I posted my comment, which is number 6, on sept. 3, 2009. somebody better explain why we have a little Orwellian animal farm going on here. for the record that is a complete lie. rewritten fabricated time date stamp. it could not have been past 2007 but im guessing it was 2006 and the original date of this article which says sept. 14 2006 has also been altered so as to make it impossible for me to have posted it before it was ever written

  • 557 Posted by griessinthewood on Fri Sep 18, 2009 9:27PM EDT Report Abuse

    this says I posted my comment, which is number 6, on sept. 3, 2009. somebody better explain why we have a little Orwellian animal farm going on here. for the record that is a complete lie. rewritten fabricated time date stamp. it could not have been past 2007 but im guessing it was 2006 and the original date of this article which says sept. 14 2006 has also been altered so as to make it impossible for me to have posted it before it was ever written

  • 558 Posted by griessinthewood on Fri Sep 18, 2009 9:32PM EDT Report Abuse

    yeah look at #555 posted on aug. 16, 2009 somehow miraculously this guy time traveled as #554 was posted on sept. 3, 2009

  • 559 Posted by colterhawkstetler on Wed Sep 23, 2009 3:06PM EDT Report Abuse

    S.O.B. I live in Montana near the Canadian boarder... Well what do you do? I guess since most cities have more people than my entire state we are lucky to even have multiple carriers to choose from.

More Posts: First Prev 27 28 29 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.