Who Really Has the Largest Cellular Network?

Thu Sep 14, 2006 1:36PM EDT

See Comments (559)

You've seen the commercials. You've heard the debates. You can't go a week without hearing Verizon Wireless, Cingular, or Sprint claim to have the biggest or fastest wireless network in America... or sometimes all three of them!

So who's right? Who really does have the biggest cellular network in the U.S.? I put the question to the big three networks to find out how they make their claims and what data they had to back it up. (And while I love T-Mobile as much as anyone, its network is decidedly smaller in both coverage and number of subscribers, nor do they make such grandiose claims, so it was originally excluded in this survey (update below).)

For starters, you'll see that no carrier claims to have a larger network based on actual geographic coverage (except Alltel, see below). In fact, no carrier even seems to know how much square mileage its network actually covers. It just isn't measured, and that data doesn't exist.

What cellular carriers use instead is a measurement of the total number of people who are physically located in the service area of the carrier. The total number of people who can reach the network is how carriers make claims about the size of their coverage; presumably the more people you can reach, the more physical ground you cover, but that's not necessarily true.

Obviously, more people live in urban areas than in rural ones, so all carriers focus their efforts on reaching the most people where they live. Rural coverage exists, but there's no way to easily tell whether one farm or another is going to have coverage aside from looking at a coverage map in detail.

With that in mind, here's what the networks said—this is all from their own mouths; I'm not spinning the information at all—about their wireless service (in the order they returned my calls).

Cingular
Cingular's standard GSM voice service reaches 270 million people, and its 2.5G EDGE service (a service that's a bit faster than GSM) reaches 250 million potential people. Cingular's 3G HSDPA service reaches 70 million people in "80 to 90 cities" and covers 40,000 miles of highway. Cingular also points out that its network is all-digital and has no analog roaming, making it the largest all-digital network in the U.S. Since it's GSM, you can also take your phone worldwide (with voice service in 200 countries and data service in 100), which you can't do with CDMA networks like the other two carriers have.

Verizon Wireless
Verizon offers standard voice coverage to 291 million potential people if you include its roaming partners who provide service where Verizon does not. If you discount the roaming partners and just include towers owned and operated by Verizon, coverage is 255 million people. Verizon's 3G EV-DO network reaches 150 million-plus people. Verizon also claims to have the largest network by number of subscribers: 52.6 million retail subscribers and 54.8 million if you include resale/rebranding agreements with other carriers. Verizon also notes that J.D. Power consistently ranks Verizon as having the highest overall call quality on the market, along with T-Mobile. Verizon also claims to have the most reliable network in the States, based on a variety of third-party studies.

Sprint
Sprint's standard voice service reaches more than 295 million people (including U.S.-owned islands like Guam), and the Nextel iDen network reaches 264 million people. Sprint's 3G EV-DO network reaches 158 million people in 220 markets with more than 100,000 residents and 486 airports. Sprint's recent claims are that its broadband service is 5 times faster than Cingular's, but this is comparing to Cingular's old 2.5G EDGE service and not its newer 3G service (which has a comparable speed). Technically speaking, Sprint suprisingly has the largest amount of coverage.

Alltel (updated 10/2/06)
Here's what Alltel (finally) says: Alltel has 11 million customers and cover 72 million potential customers. "Our network covers more square miles nationally than any other carrier's network—hence we are the largest network." When I asked how the Alltel network could be larger geographically but cover less than a third of the population that the other carriers do, Alltel said, "There is no tie between pops [people covered] and network coverage... our build-out network covers more square miles than any other carrier's... pops really pertains to population in a licensed area." It seems to me that there actually is a strong tie between the geographic size of the network and the number of people living inside that area. And since no other network actually even measures the size of its network geographically, I have to take these claims with a grain of salt.

T-Mobile (updated 10/3/06)
T-Mobile got back to me with this information: T-Mobile reaches 275 million people in the U.S. and has 23 million customers. The company didn't offer information about how much of its coverage is through its own network vs. its affiliates.

And that's the scoop!

So who's got the biggest network? If you compare geographic coverage maps, it sure looks like Verizon, but Sprint genuinely seems to cover more people, if by a small margin, with both voice and high-speed data. (Those coverage maps are hardly standardized, so it's tough to draw conclusions based on them.) Cingular, however, does have an advantage by having more digital service. Analog roaming, common in rural areas, can be expensive and buggy, and many phones simply don't have analog radios at all any more. Cingular's international support is also worth noting. Then there's Verizon: Those call quality claims are hard to ignore and are probably more important to most users than a few extra towers out in the boonies.

Bottom line: All three networks are suitably large for more than 99 percent of U.S. users. Unless you frequent parts of Montana near the Canadian border, you shouldn't experience dead zones more than once in a blue moon. My recommendation: Find a phone you love and a plan you can afford and give it a try near where you live, but don't worry too much about who's providing the service.

Note: This does not mean that all three carriers are equally appropriate for every mobile phone user, but that, on average, they all have coverage that spans most of the country. Check out this post for more help on how to choose a cellular carrier.

Comments on Who Really Has the Largest Cellular Network?

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 6 Posted by wranglercorey on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    I totally disagree with the claim that only in a blue moon will you not have service. I am a college student and Verizon is the only service that works anywhere on campus. All of the others you have to find a particualar spot in the building to use them. Almost 100% of my friends here that did not come with Verizon have switched over. I am not saying they are the best choice for eveyone but I do not agree that the service is as good as you claim.

  • 7 Posted by griessinthewood on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:13PM EDT Report Abuse

    I Don't care for this kind of attitude at all. What can be worse than putting down an individual or group of people for any reason. What does this person mean by "hick". And if there was any group of people that truly needed mobile service geographically it would have to be, not those of us that live within about 30 seconds of a phone at any given moment but, folks that live in rural parts of the country where the closest neighbor maybe 10 or 20 miles away. Probably an ignorant wretch. (Anyone notice that I didn't call him a yuppie or point out the fact that unless he is a physician or has children that may need to reach him, he is self diluting his actual importance of even really needing a mobile phone himself)

  • 8 Posted by markwalshcpa@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:08PM EDT Report Abuse

    You must be kidding, "99% of people get good coverage," and only experience dropped calls "once in a blue moon." Overall, coverage is poor outside of major metro areas, compared to what is experienced in Europe. The carriers just get away with poor service because people in the states get used to it. Try covering Northern CA, and see what happens.

  • 9 Posted by duongchilinh on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:50PM EDT Report Abuse

    During the 2 years I was with Verizon, I had drop service left and right. I continuously got disconnected during a call, especially when I was driving. I switched over to several phones and got the same result. Once my contract with Verizon was over, I switched to Cingular and I've been very happy. I father-in-law has a Verizon work phone and when we were down in Mrytle Beach, his verizon phone lost connection while my Cingular was at full strength. He ended up borrowing my phone to make his calls during our stay there. I'll definitely renew my plan with Cingular.

  • 10 Posted by danial542003 on Tue Sep 19, 2006 1:03PM EDT Report Abuse

    I would like anyone who has access to Consumer Reports most recent report. Based on customer complaints about quality and other complaints in about 20 or 25 major cities, Verizon was clearly the winner. Sprint middle of the road t-mobile just behind Verizon and Cingular was almost always at the bottom of the list of bad quality.

  • 11 Posted by thefraug@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:04PM EDT Report Abuse

    Service also depends on the type of phone you have and how old it is. My mom and I both had an old LG with AT&T and Cingular and the service was horrible. But now I have the Sony Ericsson w600i and the has a razr and we have service most of the time. Usually I have more bars then her phone does though. So I'm thinking the phones make a difference also.

  • 12 Posted by wexlerb@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:43PM EDT Report Abuse

    I currently have Verizon and have had okay service most of the time. I constantly get garbled phone calls and have to to re-dial the person to get a good connection. This problem also happens to friends that also have Verizon. The best service I have had, has been with Alltel, but most of the people I know have Verizon, so it's cheaper to use them. It would be nice to get great sevice, both inside and outside a building where ever you go, instead of all these new features that do nothing but take away the basics of what the phone is suppose to be, a phone.

  • 13 Posted by scott2buzy on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:08PM EDT Report Abuse

    i use sprint, and nextel both work great in the areas i need them too, but no one mentioned the ic502 (sprint/nextel) model that works on both networks???? sprint is the best and merging with nextel will continue to have the best service

  • 14 Posted by jeffschwoerer on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:32PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have had Verizon for many years - way back when it was called Airtouch. I am happy with the service. However, I recently had an opportunity to travel from Sacramento to Fort Worth traveling on Interstate 40 from Barstow, CA through the California desert, across Northern Arizona, New Mexico and the Texas Panhandle. I experienced quite a few dead spots and alot of weak signal areas. This was very surprising to me, considering this is a MAJOR east-west route across the US. From Kingman to Flagstaff was the worst area, with many miles of dead area. Are there any other people on other networks who have experienced this, or is it just Verizon?

  • 15 Posted by matyasecm on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:11PM EDT Report Abuse

    I find your statementto be strongly in error 'All three networks are suitably large for more than 99 percent of U.S. users. Unless you frequent parts of Montana near the Canadian border, you shouldn't experience dead zones more than once in a blue moon. " There are plenty of "dead zones" for all Cell carriers throughout the US esecially in populated areas. No cell carriers work at all in the Beverly area in Chicago or in Beverly Shores area of NW Indiana. My Verizon service is terrble in St. Augustine, Florida but grat in rural Mississippi! Go figure. Cingular nd especially Verizon based on my experience have a long way to go. I have found a midwest company US Cellulat to have to most reliable service nationwide. I would like to know why this would be the case? Perhaps you or someone would shed some light on the frequent "dropped Call" problem? Mike

  • 16 Posted by mjey7 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:22PM EDT Report Abuse

    I also have Verizon and normally we get great service. I dont get many dropped calls, if I do its dues to my older model phone. I would like to point out that service is very hard to come by in parts of Arizon a too. I was visiting the Grand Canyon earlier this year and there is no service at all around the park or on the highways surrounding it.

  • 17 Posted by budweiser11023 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:15PM EDT Report Abuse

    I had Verizon for 2 years and had no problems at all with the service and never lost a call once. Loved the network however from my area the in-store customer service was terrible so I switched to Alltel after the my contract was up. Only have one dropped call so far in a month and like the in-store customer service a lot better and the prices. So Either one of those companies works for me.

  • 18 Posted by scottw1171 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:10PM EDT Report Abuse

    I was with Cingular, but switched to Verizon 2 years ago and I must say where I live in Northern Louisiana it's fantastic. Cingular was so terrible and by far the network with the MOST dropped calls. Always fell back on the excuse of "we are working on that" garbage! I love Verizon and at this point plan to stay.

  • 19 Posted by yep_im_rich on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:56PM EDT Report Abuse

    well cingular is my network and i have never had a deadzone are nothing like that my phone works any were iam even in hospitals were the ex-ray machins are i been on the other side of the world and it still work cingular is the only network that has nationwide the best network ever sprint dont reach for and verzion roams to much with cingular u never have to worry about anything not pay for roaming are deadzone i love cingular its the best i been with them for 8 years and never had any troulble and they are right when they say more bars in more places

  • 20 Posted by gokulzno on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:11PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have Cingular and I have never had a dropcall, but my kid was dropping calls and the reason for which he was dropping calls was because he was using a phone that was dual-band. I use a phone that is quadband, and I gotta say that is great! and also same with my kid. I did a small research and what i found out was that if you want great reception you have to have a quad phone - not only for here, but also for outside the US. Now with the whole think with Cingular and AT&T is even greater than before. If you have a cheap phone - I personally believe thats how ur reception is going to be.

  • 21 Posted by jojoz2004 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:40PM EDT Report Abuse

    I currently sell cingular and sprint as my job but carry verizon. In my area, central IL sprint has coverage only about 5 miles off of the interstate, if you are past that barrier, you go into roaming. Sprint and Nextel are not merged everywhere in the us. In my area they are still 2 seperate companies due to the being franchise nextel dealers in the area. Cingular has ok coverage in my area, still quite a few dead spots in majorly populated areas. I carry Verizon because in my opinion they are the best carrier in my area with coverage and dropped calls. And YES i have found dead zones with every carrier. It is totally impossible for them to be EVERYWHERE. Call quality is good with all 3 carriers around this area. I can not speak about T-Mobile because they have no service until you get to a nearby college town(40 miles away). Definatly the quality of phone you have is a major factor in coverage also.

  • 22 Posted by siranthony7 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:24PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have a Nextel Phone, but since they added Sprint I can't complain at all. Nextel just has higher priced plans, although you save with free network and two-way. Gool post though.

  • 23 Posted by nevertuesday on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:36PM EDT Report Abuse

    I got really bad service when I was with Verizon where I live, in the most important places I could NEVER get a signal (that includes both deep in the woods in Conn. as well as on a highway in New Jersey!) I have MUCH better coverage with Cingular. I will say, however, that I have had really bad customer service through each, with Verizon being worse since they just outright lied to me.

  • 24 Posted by herunterapol on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:18PM EDT Report Abuse

    I travel all over the country and have never had a problem with Verizon. I also currently have T-Mobile service and that seems to work great only in large metropolotan areas. I have tried Cingular and Sprint and was unsatisfied. I'm not saying Verizon is the best choce for everyone, but it has been working for me for several years now and I've gotten most of my contacts to switch and they love it as well.

  • 25 Posted by wai_oli on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:39PM EDT Report Abuse

    i have cingular...and i live in western los angeles and i don't have any network in some parts of my apartment (i actually have to go by the window)!!! and supposedly they have the widest coverage...i also have t-mobile and they're pretty good... :)

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.