Your Printer May Be Hazardous To Your Health

Tue Jul 31, 2007 11:35PM EDT

See Comments (722)

I've long heard rumors that the fine particulate dust used in laser printer toner cartridges may be a health risk. It certainly makes sense: Not all of that stuff can stick to the paper, and if you've ever spilled toner you know there's no way it can be good for your lungs. Now a controlled study is confirming the information, saying that 30 percent of all laser printers tested emit dangerous particles described as "causing lasting damage on the scale of inhaled cigarette smoke." These tiny particles lodge deep in the lungs and can lead to anything from lung irritation to full-on cancer.

The tests come from an Australian technology university and were conducted in a "large open-plan space," and found that printers could increase particulate matter in the air by up to 400 percent.

While I'm still trying to obtain the list of high vs. low particle emitters from the university, there appears to be a lot of variability among machines and even among different toner cartridges. New cartridges, for example, produce more particle matter than old ones. Printing graphics pages also produces more particle matter than text, since more toner is used, and obviously, air quality gets worse the more pages you spit out. I'll post the full list of printers tested here (or a link to it) as soon as I can obtain one.

The upshot is that printer emissions should potentially be regulated much the way that auto emissions are, but even in the absence of government intervention, use common sense around your printer: Limit use when possible (tell the guy that prints out every single email to cut it out), sequester printers in their own rooms and away from workers, ventilate offices appropriately, and have your own air and printer tested before it becomes a serious health problem.

UPDATE: The full study is available online now (scroll down to Table 1, at the bottom, for the list of printers tested). HP LaserJets (the vast majority of the models tested were HPs) appear among both the best and worst on the list. Check it out!

LINK: Printers pose health risks: study 

UPDATE: HP responds here 

Comments on Your Printer May Be Hazardous To Your Health

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 706 Posted by divergilio@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:44PM EDT Report Abuse

    Lead in our kid's toys and now this? Will we ever be safe or will we be forced to always have cancer, or worse, looming over heads??? I think we may have been better off when things were kept simple....less information created less panic. Our need to keep up with globalization is killing us!

  • 707 Posted by sistergirl1994 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:24PM EDT Report Abuse

    Do u think Canon Pixma iP16000? Everything does cause bad hbealth for everyone.

  • 708 Posted by risman@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:42PM EDT Report Abuse

    Good Lord!!!!Will you panzies quit worring about everything under the sun? You must be miserable to live your lives in constant fear. I feel for you....

  • 710 Posted by lnaticdrvr2004 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 6:55PM EDT Report Abuse

    Our office consist of two printers and a copy in the middle of the room, desk within three feet of them. We are a school and deal with the student's funding so we print and print and print all day long. Wow. That's not even counting the printers at the supervisor's desks. I think copiers would have the same problem, they use toner too.

  • 711 Posted by ckharleman on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:26PM EDT Report Abuse

    Remember, this is only laser printers. If the paper is hot when it comes out of your printer, its a laser. They should forbid these at schools.

  • 712 Posted by p_vung on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:23PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have a 3 in 1 inkjet printer ( You know the ones that can be used as a fax machine, photocopier, and printer ?) I normally use it for photocopying, then printing, then faxing. As well, I trerat my printer VERY well- the paper that I use is specifically designed for ink printers, and the usage is only moderate because when it overheatd, it is not good, so I simply shut it off. As well, I prefer to save up 10 photocopying/printing jobs into 1 large tasks rather than doing each task every day. It is the same with projects when i was in school, wait to the LAST MINUTE! ????????????????????????????????????????????ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ

  • 714 Posted by scottishabbey on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:08PM EDT Report Abuse

    Wow! Lawyers don't even have to chase down ambulances anymore. Thanks to the 'net/web things like this will just fall into their laps (as if the laser printer people meant to do this). It won't matter if anyone set out to eliminate office workers though. A good couple of class action suits, and we either won't have to worry about even having laser printers or they will cost 6 times what they do now and you'll have to sign a gazillion releases and have stickers on it like cigarette packages and alcohol bottles do now to prevent Darwin from winning out. Of course it could be the ultimate Darwinism for smokers, then we won't worry about second hand smoke either. Fatbottomedgirl25, go to a hardware store or a Home Depot/Lowe's/whatever and ask then for a mask designed to block very fine particles, like cement dust or finer. Or hold a coup to have the equipment moved into a very large room (the machine equivilent of a smoking area). Don't forget the mask as you go in. You'll get used to it. On the other hand, wait and see what studies done here show. Oddly enough, what is true for one population isn't always true for another. For example, in Oz, people with ulers test 99% positive for H. pylorri. Here, it is about 30%. Go figure.

  • 715 Posted by scottishabbey on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:08PM EDT Report Abuse

    Sheesh. Although I don't want to retract my previous comment, I didn't realize this was based on ONE study. How unprofessional of the Aussies to make this claim on the basis of ONE study. And I'll bet it wasn't even double blinded. Just another example of Ivory Tower self pleasuring statements based on insuffient evidence (I mean REALLY, ONE blasted study?) to get more funding for their pet project.

  • 717 Posted by cnjohn@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:27PM EDT Report Abuse

    LISTEN! Some laser printers ARE dangerous, cell phones and wireless computers ARE bad for you and if you ignore this, don't cry when it happens to you! Use your head and THINK, unless you're busy talking on your cell phone... it's the gov't giving free rein to corporations without regulation. It's NOT paranoia etc. This kind of response may also lead to saying, "politics is all corrupt so I don't vote". VOTE or it DOES get corrupt! Bush LOST the past 2 elections (massive vote fraud from Diebold machines). Get involved while you can...

  • 719 Posted by footadzija on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:01PM EDT Report Abuse

    You Americans are so rude. Just look at this idiotic comments!!! As it is sad in one episode of South Park, one forth of your population is retarded. Including the president.

  • 720 Posted by bluegrasslloyd on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:09PM EDT Report Abuse

    We're all gonna die! Nobody tells you that 99.9% of these so called scientific studies are junk science and innacurate.

  • 721 Posted by davidwright_19 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:38PM EDT Report Abuse

    I work around 1000 printers and the air I breath comes directy from them too!! I guess im going to have to stop licking the pages as they come out of the printer, well, I guess fax is still fair game.

More Posts: First Prev 35 36 37 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.