HP to Researchers: Our Printers Are Safe

Fri Aug 3, 2007 12:49PM EDT

See Comments (78)

In the wake of the report, released earlier this week, that expresses grave concerns over the safety of laser printers and ultrafine particulate matter they might be releasing into the air, HP is striking back. Today I received the company's official (and, I have to say, scathing) response to the matter: "HP does not agree with [the study's] conclusion or some of the bold claims the authors have made."

HP doesn't really claim that its printers don't release ultrafine particles (though it's important to note that the study showed that many HP printers didn't release any emissions at all), saying that they are "consistently below recognized occupational exposure limits."

Rather, HP is taking issue with the notion that these emissions are dangerous. Here's what HP says: "There are no indications that ultrafine particle (UFP) emissions from laser printing systems are associated with special health risks. Currently, the nature and chemical composition of such particles—whether from a laser printer or from a toaster—cannot be accurately characterized by analytical technology."

HP agrees more testing is needed and is working with independent testing group Air Quality Sciences in the U.S. and a similar group in Germany. As well, the company says that HP products meet all current health and safety guidelines for office equipment.

So there you have it. HP says the printers are safe. Australia says they aren't. Who's right? Stay tuned, as I'm sure this argument is about to get really nasty...

You can find the entire text of HP's rebuttal here. 

Comments on HP to Researchers: Our Printers Are Safe

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by davcbr on Fri Aug 3, 2007 1:11PM EDT Report Abuse

    Asbestos is a very inert material; the danger it poses is from the very small particles of it that can become lodged in the lungs.

  • 2 Posted by kylelauderdale@sbcglobal.net on Fri Aug 3, 2007 1:16PM EDT Report Abuse

    The letter written by HP is hardly scathing! It seems obvious to the letter that HP too is concerned about the outcomes of the testing and that testing they have done so far has not resulted in any harmful findings SO FAR. I think the letter is a response of a responsible company doing what should be done to keep people safe. I think that the journalist writing about this subject is trying to blow the entire subject out of porportion. Lets keep the journalists honest here!

  • 3 Posted by robergat on Fri Aug 3, 2007 1:21PM EDT Report Abuse

    no big deal...HP is the #1 for a reason... if there is a health risk, they will fix it.. a huge corporation like HP couldn't afford that kind of bad publicity...

  • 4 Posted by trentbaer on Fri Aug 3, 2007 1:21PM EDT Report Abuse

    Sounds like the Philip Morris response to smoking causing cancer......

  • 5 Posted by spencer1957 on Fri Aug 3, 2007 1:24PM EDT Report Abuse

    Toner is carcinogenic, and extremely difficult to safely clean if spilled. If toner paticulates are being mixed into the air by printers/copiers, this is dangerous. Toasters do not contain or expel toner (under normal operating conditions - LOL).

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Post a Comment

 

Sign In to see your profile information, saved products and more...

Register Sign In

My Favorite Gadgets

 

Recent Activity

 

Recently Viewed

on | off on | off
 

Recent Searches

on | off on | off
 
 
 

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.