Fri Aug 17, 2007 3:13PM EDT
See Comments (30)
After years of suing grandmothers, children, and the deceased, the RIAA is finally facing some payback for its inane approach to increasing its revenues: Disabled mother Tanya Andersen is launching the first class action lawsuit against the RIAA and the Big 4 record labels for a variety of causes, ranging from negligence and fraud to intentional infliction of emotional distress and RICO racketeering violations.
Given that the RIAA has sued roughly 30,000 people to date, it's hard not to imagine she'll find some takers who want to hop aboard the bandwagon and put an end to the group's often malicious and always tragically misguided lawsuits.
Andersen is one of the few people who have gotten into a courtroom with the RIAA (most of those sued have settled). After a two-year battle, the case against her and her eight-year-old daughter (at the time of the filing) was recently dismissed. Her counterclaims have been ongoing, but her class action suit is a new addition to the mix.
In an unrelated case, another RIAA lawsuit defendant, Michelle Santangelo, is suing AOL and a family friend: She was targeted by the RIAA, she says, for KaZaA software that the friend installed without her knowledge. But she's also holding AOL accountable, saying it should have filtered any potentially illegal traffic from going over its network. Interesting case, though probably not one she'll win; I'm sure AOL's terms of service note that it does not filter traffic, no matter what you're doing.
Regardless, it's nice to see some of the victims of these lawsuits striking back. The RIAA has had free rein in the legal system for far too long, and it's time it started defending its actions instead of just being left alone to make accusations through its freewheeling, strong-arm tactics. Go Tanya!
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
hmm interesting... theres like no point in this article really i mean its like saying umm well she probably wont win but like its nice to know that people are fighting back i mean wow ok then...
They are still winning though. Look at what you call them: RIAA. Let's remember that the RIAA is only acting on behalf (as a cover) of it's members: Warner, EMI, Sony and Vivendi. Those guys don't care if you hate RIAA as long as you don't hate them. Let's target the hate correctly.
The RIAA is a joke, they probably wouldn't have to sue people if their products were within a reasonable price range. I mean come on, CD's have been on the market for about 20 years now, and they said as the technology became cheaper the prices of CD's would come down, but it costs more to buy a CD now, than it did when they first hit the market. If you look at price comparisons, it costs less to buy a hit movie on DVD than it does to buy a CD of your favorite music artist. Even though you aren't supposed to copy DVD's, what difference does that make when you can buy used titles at the video store for under $10 or even buy some titles at places like Wal Mart, K Mart, Target, etc. for around $5. Or you can even buy a DVD recorder and some blank discs and copy your movies from cable TV if you choose to do so. At least the MPAA knows what it takes to keep their customers happy by offering their products at reasonable prices and by not trying to sue their customers just to improve their profits.
they probably feel like you work for the RIAA
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
26 Posted by tothewack on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:18PM EDT Report Abuse
Theres a difference between good law and bad law. The RIAA does whatever it can using bad law (illegal ways) to get people. Yes people do pirate stuff and have been for close to thirty years now. But after awile you would think people would take the hint and lower prices or something.