Wed Aug 29, 2007 12:47PM EDT
See Comments (2)
Rather surprising news from the gaming world: Only one in 50 players who use the Steam gaming download service (a popular way of distributing the latest games and representative of the highest-end gamers out there) have a DirectX 10-compatible graphics card.
DirectX 10 is Microsoft's latest version of its graphics subsystem for Windows, but it requires a new video card to run, plus Windows Vista: Microsoft says DX10 won't be released for Windows XP.
That's terrible news for game developers, who are on the verge of releasing some striking new titles, like Crysis and Spore, as few players will likely be able to see the games in anything approaching their full glory. Valve Software president Gabe Newell has called Microsoft out for the Vista-only approach, a rather blatant attempt to strongarm consumers into upgrading their OS. While Valve's own Half-Life 2 Orange Box uses some DirectX 10 features, players literally won't notice any difference if they stick with XP and DX9.
What's this likely to mean going forward? There's probably no rush to upgrade to DX10 hardware, as developers are unlikely to be implementing many DX10 features on their titles in coming months. Given the stability and history of the XP/DX9 platform, I expect games will actually run more smoothly on the older hardware, especially considering the serious driver development problems graphics companies have experienced getting hardware to work with Vista to date. Sure, if you're buying a new graphics card, get a DX10-capable model, but it looks like there's no reason to rush to upgrade.Â
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
This is the type of thing that happens when all of your eggs are in one basket. I admire MS for a lot of things, but they have a real tendency to use their position to leverage things to their advantage. When everyone uses/requires directx then MS can do what they want. On the other hand this sounds like typical "why do I need to spend my $ when MS can do it for me" whining. Remember this is a free country, if the developers don't want to live without directx10 features they are free to develop (and support) them on their own. MS is not "obligated" to provide some kind of free service that the developers can use to make their games more cheaply (i.e. profitably).
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by rogueist on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:49PM EDT Report Abuse
The solution: OpenGL No more DX worries - ever...