Mon Sep 10, 2007 6:42PM EDT
See Comments (18)
It's a sad day for transhumanism and man-meets-machine advocates: Researchers have found that microchip implants, such as the VeriChip ID implants used to easily and permanently identify your pets (including mine) in case they get lost, lead to malignant cancers in up to 10 percent of the animals who receive the implants. The news originally broke over the weekend and has been spreading like wildfire today.
Strangely, the stories surfacing are the result of an unearthed medical study from the 1990s, which the AP just uncovered.
But now the issue of implants has people buzzing especially loudly, since they were recently approved for use in human patients, with Alzheimer's and other dementia sufferers being the focus for early trials. About 2,000 such people have received the implants so far, the idea being that if they become lost, the chip will make it easier for them to be reunited with their caregivers.
Still, little has been said about the actual cause of the tumors in this study. They may in fact have little to do with the technology components of the implants but rather the glass in which they are encapsulated. About the size of a grain of rice, the VeriChip capsules are meant to be non-inflammatory to the body, but that may not be the case in all recipients of the implants. See the sidebar in this story from The Ledger for more on how the immune system could respond problematically to implants and result in cancer.
While it may be too soon to rush Spot to the vet to have his chip removed, it's an issue that's definitely worth watching more closely in the coming months, as additional studies (hopefully with more recent data) should come to light. Bottom line: I'm not having our cat's transponder taken out just yet, but I'd certainly think twice before injecting one into grandma. How about a tattoo instead?
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
WOW ! I was just discussing with vet about an implant for my pure-breed Shiz-Zu, now I think I'll wait for further discovery on the possibilities of complications.
I work in an Animal hospital and all my pets have been micro-chipped. I whole heartedly believe that the benefits way out weight any possible cancer risk. I've seen many pets reunited because they had microchips and have seen no pets with cancer related to micro-chipping. Our hospital manager's cat was found 3 months after she stopped looking and would have been definitely euthanized at the pound if not micro-chipped because they felt it was too old to be adopted. A Yorkie that had been missing for 2 months was reunited because it had a microchip. The owner was So Happy!! And we have even had a dog who wa----- by a car receive rapid treatment because we got a hold of an owner because it was micro-chipped. With out the chip the dog would have gone to animal control and who know if the owner would have been found. They where at work and didn't even know their dog had gotten out. So I will still recommend them. By the way Vaccines also Carry a risk of cancer, but almost everyone gets them for their pets anyway. And I've actually seen pets with Vaccine related cancer, but have never seen micro chip related cancer. Think about that for awhile!!!!
I agree with silverswirl. Thanks for putting things into perspective.
I'm with silverswirl too. My cats are "lojacked" and (knock on wood) no problems from the chips.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by dirtypockets@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:43PM EDT Report Abuse
thank you for this article, please continue to educate americans on upcoming events!