Unlikely: UK Attempting to Ban Power-Hungry TVs

Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:12PM EDT

See Comments (5)

Americans aren't the only ones who love oversized gadgets: Plasma TVs are all the rage in Britain, but doting officials are deeply worried that the power-hungry TV sets will collapse the nation's electrical grid and ruin the environment to boot. The response: A proposal to ban them (and other electronics). Or more accurately: Products for sale in various categories (including DVD players and freezers) would be given a threshold of power consumption which they couldn't legally exceed if you want to sell them in the UK.

Other rules would outlaw "standby" lights and similar low-power modes on electronics, but it is specifically plasma TVs which are targeted in the proposal. The report was scheduled to be unveiled today to an official UK environmental protection department.

Ultimately, attempts to outright ban products like this tend to fail, for a wide variety of reasons. The big one is that technology moves at a much faster pace than government: Limits on one type of product that exists today are obsolete by the time they go into effect, which is typically not for three to five years after a bill is signed. The industry discontinues one technology in favor of a successor, or the technology evolves into something else. Loopholes invariably abound, taking the teeth out of the legislation.

A better response: Taxation. If you want to curb electrical use, why not tax the sale of electronics on a per-watt basis, and use the proceeds to fund research into alternative energy and lower-power alternatives? By making lower-cost products more financially attractive, you encourage overall better consumer behavior rather than simply slapping the consumer with a "you can't have this" stick. Plus, what government doesn't like free money?

LINK: Plans to ban plasma TVs 

Comments on Unlikely: UK Attempting to Ban Power-Hungry TVs

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by fjcamp2002 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:00PM EDT Report Abuse

    Wow. This is wrong on so many levels. Added taxes on a per watt basis? I thought that was already done by the taxes on electricity that consumers pay on their electric bills. The idea that goverments like "free money" is offensive. As someone who pays taxes, I know it is not "free money" - it is money I have earned and then paid to the government. The government uses some of it to defend me, some of it to take care of the less fortunate, and way too much of it is wasted. But none of it is "free".

  • 2 Posted by jairaj on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:27PM EDT Report Abuse

    Chris you're on to something there, but instead of a tax per watt usage there really should be a "true" cost element to both the water and power we use. The rates charged now (exorbitant as it may feel) are heavily subsidised, directly or indirectly. Let's stop subsidizing the power industry and let the rates rise to natural levels.

  • 3 Posted by fjcamp2002 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:00PM EDT Report Abuse

    Chris - I don't want the product outlawed, but neither do I want it taxed for power usage twice - once when I buy it, and again per watt used. You are suggesting paying the purchase tax and the ongoing one for electricity. If you add the one at point of purchase and then cut the other one, maybe we are on to something. But if the real purpose is to decrease power usage, it is still better to tax at the meter - which measures all usage - rather than at purchase. If I use my plasma instead of my dishwasher, maybe it comes out the same.

  • 4 Posted by michaelshows on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:18PM EDT Report Abuse

    If they did do a tax, why tax just power-hungry items? Just do a per-household tax for every kW-hour above a certain threshold. If you wanna run 3 plasma TVs and no refrigerator, that's your business. But that strays from the issue which is plasma power consumption, not effective energy regulation. If LCDs use less power, market forces should skew consumers toward using them. My understanding is that they are also cheaper, clearer, and last longer. Banning anything for power reasons doesn't make sense to me, unless there is absolutely no alternative. In which case, they still probably wouldn't ban a device altogether. Like anyone would say, "You can't have a window air conditioner period. It uses too much power." Not likely. I don't like the ban idea.

  • 5 Posted by seamusfurr on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:10PM EDT Report Abuse

    Upgrading from a 27" CRT to a 50" plasma increased our monthly energy bill by about $40. I had no idea about the hidden costs, and I would have opted for a different technology had I been aware of it. Banning the technology is probably not the right way to go, but better labeling and disclosure might be.

More Posts: 1

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.