US Navy to Alter "Swastika" Building Due to Web Maps

Thu Sep 27, 2007 5:13PM EDT

See Comments (1364)

Your tax dollars at work: The US Navy will be spending about $600,000 to redesign or camouflage a 1960s barracks building in San Diego because of complaints that it looks like a swastika when viewed from the air. In the past this might have been a problem only for the occasional air traveler who happened over Coronado island, but with the advent of aerial mapping and visualization tools like Google Earth, everyone can see anything from the sky. In fact, many people have made a game out of finding oddities in satellite photos.

Now it's one thing to see landmarks like this and snicker over a designer's missteps 40 years ago (the Navy says it noticed the shape but that it didn't think anyone would see it from above), but it's another thing altogether to complain to the Navy about the shape of a building when viewed from space. But people really seem to have the time on their hands: The Navy says it's been inundated with complaints; enough, I suppose, to justify spending that much money on new structures and extra bushes. It's the first known case of its kind.

So what will the building look like when the job is done, I wonder? A set of four connected squares? A pinwheel formed from triangles? Post your ideas for what the Navy ought to do out of the wayward swastika here and we'll see if we can't pass them along to the powers that be.

LINK: Google Maps Causes US Navy To Change Its Swastika Building 

Comments on US Navy to Alter "Swastika" Building Due to Web Maps

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 48 Posted by d0s666 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:33PM EDT Report Abuse

    Reroof it with black shingles.

  • 49 Posted by iiyuurikoii on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:23PM EDT Report Abuse

    you know...it didn't used to be a swastika; it used to be a symbol of peace [used by monks] before the dumb germans of that time mixed up it's meaning ...but yes our tax dollars hard at work :sarcastic:...I'm not surprised...

  • 50 Posted by kaelthas18 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:46PM EDT Report Abuse

    Hey!world war 2 is over,until now? u still argue with that sign? Look, there are billions of people who are starving around the world, think of it, Thats big! $600,000 just give it to the poor!! thats much better...God will repay them after life if they do that..

  • 51 Posted by crowolf64 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:31PM EDT Report Abuse

    People cry and whine like babies about anything these days!! Send them all a box of kleenex and leave the building alone.

  • 52 Posted by holycow91745 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:20PM EDT Report Abuse

    Another wastefull spending by our government. What is new, all the decision makers are morons and don't have to spend their own money. Navy is the one got too much free time to worry about what people see from GoogleEarth!

  • 53 Posted by niubmore on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:39PM EDT Report Abuse

    One, there is no point to this entire story, there are other things to spend money on. And two, if they are going to do something about it, why not move a part of the building instead of reconstructing it.

  • 54 Posted by k9forkids on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:46PM EDT Report Abuse

    Thats us Americans hard at work to be political correct and please everyone. But here is the real question; the architect drawing the blueprints and the naval officer signing of on the building project, its not like they didn't know what the building is going to look like before it was build.

  • 55 Posted by wheeldarrow on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:44PM EDT Report Abuse

    Construct some patio-type covers or awnings that would connect the buildings to look like a large square from space (because that is where I spend most of my time) for a much lesser price tag and move on to something more important. For even less money, the Navy (and everyone else who is wringing their hands over this non-issue) can tell all of the complainant's to bugger off and look at some other neighborhoods. What a waste of time!! I agree with mcmillen66. He is my hero!

  • 56 Posted by jscnlc on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:42PM EDT Report Abuse

    For the love of Pete! Is there any use in even voicing an opinion on such an assanine action the Navy has planned. There is little doubt in my mind that if we spend a few million in retracking our satellites we could probably find many more structures that take the form of a host of "offensive" resemblances. I live just outside Winston-Salem and the Wachovia Bank tower is phallic in shape and is nicknamed the big white "one". Oh, but thats in the private sector so complaining (as has been going on for years) won't do a thing. But complain to the government when the moon is in the seventh sky and hey...look what we get

  • 57 Posted by reconsteel on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:33PM EDT Report Abuse

    What a complete waist of tax payers money! Who the heck is tall enough to look down on that and be offended? heck give me that $600,000.00. Everyone who drives by has probably never noticed.

  • 58 Posted by sunshine4oregon on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:48PM EDT Report Abuse

    If they must alter the structure (which is idiotic), how about enclosing two of the "sides" with a covered walkway. This would alter the aerial image but not cost a whole bunch of our tax dollars. I am just a tax payer.

  • 59 Posted by wonderdogbenji on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    I think they should make the buildings look like a burning cross or maybe a hammer and sickle. Seriously the "Nazi" inverted cross is too common a shape to totally erase it from the planet. So shut up an deal.

  • 61 Posted by ptstannard on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:21PM EDT Report Abuse

    When we get people complaining about stupid things like this, this country officialy has nothing to complain about.

  • 62 Posted by mac_000038 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:02PM EDT Report Abuse

    Don't worry the Navy is going to waste the money one way or another. If it isn't spent buying a $400 hammer they might as well redo some buildings that have been up for over 40 years. I am also ex-Navy, and the $400 hammer is true.

  • 63 Posted by sixfigincom2003 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:25PM EDT Report Abuse

    well, when I was in the Navy, I went to school in Lakehurst NJ. It's the same place the Hindenburg caught fire. The barraks I lived in were built by the nazis. They pourposly built it in the shape of a swastika. Google earth that one.

  • 64 Posted by lastdanceg on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:56PM EDT Report Abuse

    600.000$!! Spend that money on protecting the troops with better equipment.

  • 65 Posted by daveefa10 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:37PM EDT Report Abuse

    Basically this is all about whiny jews who saw it and started complaining. thanks for putting american taxpayers out 600k jews, as if it isnt bad enough we donate billions a year to your lost cause in israel

More Posts: First Prev 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.