Fri Oct 20, 2006 3:27PM EDT
See Comments (66)
Great question! There are lots of free antivirus applications, but I've never seen them directly compared. So I did the hard work for you, installing them each in turn on a test machine with about 16GB of data on it and running a full scan of each (including any options to scan inside compressed files). For each application I ran a complete or scan of the hard drive in the application's most thorough, high-priority mode. Otherwise, all default settings were left unchanged.
Below you'll find my notes about the interface, the software in general, and the time it took to run the system scan (plus how many files it actually scoured). While I can't provide much data on how effective these applications are at actually catching real viruses since I don't have a library of viruses to test, I have noted the virus.gr detection rating for each app, which is a good barometer for this. (I've covered these ratings before.) Finally, I've ranked them from my most favorite to least favorite app below. (Note that I'm only covering antivirus software here, not anti-spyware software like Ad-Aware or Spybot.)
AOL Active Virus Shield - TOP PICK! - virus.gr detection rating: 99.62%; total running time: 31 min, 16 sec; total files scanned: 224,565
The bad news: The software requires an email activation code (which means registering online, and which takes a long time to arrive). I also can't blame anyone for not entirely trusting anything with the AOL logo, but Kaspersky (see full review) actually provides the tech behind the antivirus software here, not AOL itself. It also installs an AOL search toolbar in your browser, ugh. The good news: The software is well designed and very easy to use. A progress bar appears during scans, along with estimated time of completion. Everything here looks on the up and up, and the virus.gr detection rating is exemplary. I'm a little perplexed about the missing 70,000 files that Active Virus Shield didn't scan that the other scanners did. (However this isn't necessarily a sign of bad security, as those files may have been identified as not prone to viruses, or Active Virus Shield may count "files" differently.)
Avast! 4.7 Home Edition - virus.gr detection rating: 87.46%; total running time: 49 min, 7 sec; total files scanned: 292,713
I'm not a huge fan of the Avast! Interface, which looks like a MP3 player and features such odd design choices as a "scan thoroughness" slider that looks like a volume control. How do you know how "thorough" this scan really is? Is 4 out of 6 thorough enough? During a scan there's no progress bar, so you never know if you have 3 or 30 minutes remaining. (Plus it's dog slow.) That sub-90% virus.gr rating is not exactly comforting, either. The software comes with a 60 day trial, after which you must register (for free, requires email address). Overall it's just too hard to navigate, which makes it too easy to misconfigure, but it works well enough. (Second opinion: PC World ranked Avast! last among virus scanners it tested in performance at catching real viruses, a fact which the virus.gr rating bears out.)
Avira AntiVir PersonalEdition Classic - virus.gr detection rating: 94.26%; total running time: 14 min, 23 sec; total files scanned: 182,215
AntiVir is relatively popular and you can see why: It's blazing fast, even though it seems to be less than thorough at scanning all the files on the drive. But Avira has at least one terrible feature: Annoying full-screen pop-ups at random intervals advertising Avira's paid software apps. Configuration is about average, and advanced options are available if you dig for them. Overall detection rates look good, making AntiVir a good third choice if the two above don't work for you.
The apps below are not recommended...
BitDefender 8 Free Edition - virus.gr detection rating: 95.57%; total running time: 26 min, 52 sec; total files scanned: 301,157
This is only an on-demand scanner and doesn't offer "real time" protection, which all four of the other scanners in this roundup offer. A decent interface and comprehensive virus.gr rating (not to mention it scanned more files than anything else I tested) don't make up for that unacceptable drawback. I wouldn't recommend it for anyone who needs any level of regular virus protection, even though it's very fast and thorough.
Grisoft AVG Free 7.5 - virus.gr detection rating: 82.82%; total running time: 13 min, 8 sec; total files scanned: 56,391
AVG has a tricky interface, with minimal configurability (for example, you can't specify whether or not AVG should scan within compressed files, and there's no indication of whether or not this happens by default) and no progress bar during scanning. With such a low virus.gr rating I'm not sure I'd trust it as my only line of virus defense. After it finished its scan in only 13 minutes, having scanned a whopping 20% of the files actually on the disk, I was ready to send this one back. (AVG is so popular that I went looking for a second opinion, and sure enough, PC World ranked it second to last among virus scanners it tested.)
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
Hello In my opinion and experience I think Antivir is the law, and the big advertising window only appears when antivir is auto updating, and is only advertising frome avira itself, so give Antivir a try :) Have a nice day.
hi. actualy if we wants to know better virus protection we must test multy level anti-virus plus how long we sur networking ang what type of pc & latest apllication softwear like microsof ie..then you will no where, when, how the spye/agen developed as a virus.. Im suggest you used AVG and Bit defender ..the result ??? i also try mcafee/norten/kaspersky but notsame as AVG + Bitdefender..Don't use any microsoft anti-virus.
Virus,spyware,malware,worm comes from the software..so....the bad the ugly ang worst virus is comes from the ANTI-VIRUS SOFTWARE Beware???The Bad Guys is smart guy ask Bill Gates further..
I think it is good for every one to get it.
Kaspersky is the best AV program around. If you have an extensive ZOO, you can test it out effectively. You get what you pay for, though. If you are running ANY other antivirus, grab a copy of Kaspersky and run it. See what the others miss :P This is comming from an old school BBSer who has been around before John McAfee arrived on the scene. Anyone remember ThunderByte? F-Prot (F-secure now) Those were the days !!!
well what about windows one care
I must say AOL is not good and it is really hard for beginners to uninstall and even if you know what your doing it is not fun! I have use and recommend AVG to all my clients and even offer it on disk with all the PC's my company manufactures, as well as Spybot and IOBits defrag and Window Optimizer programs! FREE makes it so worth it and for the average user surfing the net these programs are great but for those weary of a virus use NOD32 hands down its #1
Aol avs is the best free av even better than paid ones,my friends compu got infected with a virus and only kav and avs wer able to detect it others failed including nod32
i cant open chat room. what can i do for that?plz suggest me.
http://tech.yahoo.com/blog/null/5244
http://tech.yahoo.com/blog/null/5244
you know why u are not getting problem with avg? its because avg cannot find newly added virus in the internet. in other words avg is not very updated most especially in cleaning. if avg cannot clean a .dll files infected by such virus it will delete it lol!...
read this and then decide about aol being the top pick: http://www.downloadsquad.com/2007/08/09/aol-replaces-free-kasperky-anti-virus-software-with-mcafee/
great info - thanks! looking 4 this for ages!
hohoho
Well, I use Grisoft AVG or at least try to. Currently it's inactivated and asking for updates. I've tried the update route and still nothing. I'm not sqwaking, it's free but what a frustration. So, I'm shopping for an alternative. Your advice is helpful. Thank you.
This programme is no longer available!!ive got avast which is excellent.
I've tried them all. Used AVG for about two years with no problems. About 2 months ago I switched to Avast. I love it. It's been effective and just a great AV for free. Don't be fooled into thinking that the pay AV's are better. It's not always the case. Avast combined with Comodo's firewall make for an effective duo. Spyblaster and adware takes care of what's left. This has been the best combo for me.
If these two in your estimation are the best. and you don't really like either of them, what am I to think? What about the Yahoo anti-virus appl. which I get along with my online?
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
26 Posted by yobbo_too on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:56PM EDT Report Abuse
Tried AVG and AntiVir. AVG is unconfigurable and scans everytime you boot for 20 min. It's not thorough either I read in other tests. AntiVir was rated as best in 2 tests I read but failed to update(forum full of complaints about that with no easy solution). I stick with Avast whose little rotating globe in the taskbar has become a trusted friend. No intrusive regular scans(one very thorough one right after install at 1st reboot) and easy auto-updating. My favourite!