Fri Oct 20, 2006 3:27PM EDT
See Comments (66)
Great question! There are lots of free antivirus applications, but I've never seen them directly compared. So I did the hard work for you, installing them each in turn on a test machine with about 16GB of data on it and running a full scan of each (including any options to scan inside compressed files). For each application I ran a complete or scan of the hard drive in the application's most thorough, high-priority mode. Otherwise, all default settings were left unchanged.
Below you'll find my notes about the interface, the software in general, and the time it took to run the system scan (plus how many files it actually scoured). While I can't provide much data on how effective these applications are at actually catching real viruses since I don't have a library of viruses to test, I have noted the virus.gr detection rating for each app, which is a good barometer for this. (I've covered these ratings before.) Finally, I've ranked them from my most favorite to least favorite app below. (Note that I'm only covering antivirus software here, not anti-spyware software like Ad-Aware or Spybot.)
AOL Active Virus Shield - TOP PICK! - virus.gr detection rating: 99.62%; total running time: 31 min, 16 sec; total files scanned: 224,565
The bad news: The software requires an email activation code (which means registering online, and which takes a long time to arrive). I also can't blame anyone for not entirely trusting anything with the AOL logo, but Kaspersky (see full review) actually provides the tech behind the antivirus software here, not AOL itself. It also installs an AOL search toolbar in your browser, ugh. The good news: The software is well designed and very easy to use. A progress bar appears during scans, along with estimated time of completion. Everything here looks on the up and up, and the virus.gr detection rating is exemplary. I'm a little perplexed about the missing 70,000 files that Active Virus Shield didn't scan that the other scanners did. (However this isn't necessarily a sign of bad security, as those files may have been identified as not prone to viruses, or Active Virus Shield may count "files" differently.)
Avast! 4.7 Home Edition - virus.gr detection rating: 87.46%; total running time: 49 min, 7 sec; total files scanned: 292,713
I'm not a huge fan of the Avast! Interface, which looks like a MP3 player and features such odd design choices as a "scan thoroughness" slider that looks like a volume control. How do you know how "thorough" this scan really is? Is 4 out of 6 thorough enough? During a scan there's no progress bar, so you never know if you have 3 or 30 minutes remaining. (Plus it's dog slow.) That sub-90% virus.gr rating is not exactly comforting, either. The software comes with a 60 day trial, after which you must register (for free, requires email address). Overall it's just too hard to navigate, which makes it too easy to misconfigure, but it works well enough. (Second opinion: PC World ranked Avast! last among virus scanners it tested in performance at catching real viruses, a fact which the virus.gr rating bears out.)
Avira AntiVir PersonalEdition Classic - virus.gr detection rating: 94.26%; total running time: 14 min, 23 sec; total files scanned: 182,215
AntiVir is relatively popular and you can see why: It's blazing fast, even though it seems to be less than thorough at scanning all the files on the drive. But Avira has at least one terrible feature: Annoying full-screen pop-ups at random intervals advertising Avira's paid software apps. Configuration is about average, and advanced options are available if you dig for them. Overall detection rates look good, making AntiVir a good third choice if the two above don't work for you.
The apps below are not recommended...
BitDefender 8 Free Edition - virus.gr detection rating: 95.57%; total running time: 26 min, 52 sec; total files scanned: 301,157
This is only an on-demand scanner and doesn't offer "real time" protection, which all four of the other scanners in this roundup offer. A decent interface and comprehensive virus.gr rating (not to mention it scanned more files than anything else I tested) don't make up for that unacceptable drawback. I wouldn't recommend it for anyone who needs any level of regular virus protection, even though it's very fast and thorough.
Grisoft AVG Free 7.5 - virus.gr detection rating: 82.82%; total running time: 13 min, 8 sec; total files scanned: 56,391
AVG has a tricky interface, with minimal configurability (for example, you can't specify whether or not AVG should scan within compressed files, and there's no indication of whether or not this happens by default) and no progress bar during scanning. With such a low virus.gr rating I'm not sure I'd trust it as my only line of virus defense. After it finished its scan in only 13 minutes, having scanned a whopping 20% of the files actually on the disk, I was ready to send this one back. (AVG is so popular that I went looking for a second opinion, and sure enough, PC World ranked it second to last among virus scanners it tested.)
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
AVG has become popular that virus/malware makers exploit it features. Ad-Aware and Spyware Doctor are anti-spywares not anti-viruses. One thing weird about ad-aware is it can remove viruses though it is originally an anti-spyware program.
i used Ad-Aware....n free site advisor from Mc Afee..all work great.
Actually AVG doesnt work for me. I had it for ages and then my system started getting infected. I would scan some downloaded files and it would give them the all clear and then pick them up at a later stage.
I have windows 98 SE I need a free Anti virus that I can download I need suggestions in a hurry. Thanks, Debbie
I read all the comments that ppl had. I have been using AVG Free Edition for ages now since v6 to the current v8. v6 was the best in terms of resource usage and detection rate. v7 and 7.5 started getting heavier on memory usage and v8 is pathetic (the resident part takes up almost 46MB on my Dell vs. ~20MB with v6). I don't think it's anywhere to being the best, but it's always detected the most popular trojans, viruses out there. The Healing or Cleaning rate is quite dismal but I don't wish to do it anyway. As long as I can prevent a virus/trojan from coming in, I am good. And all of this is done for free. Lastly, it is also amongst the fastest and most responsive I have used (the list includes - Kaspersky, McAfee, Symantec Corporate, Norton, Avast etc. and AVG still rules).
I have Norton and have not had any problems with it YET. My free trial that came with my computer is up in 7 days and I need a good free anti virus protector etc. Someone please help ive been getting different answers from everyone. But the top 3 i have been hearing is AVG, Advast and Spybot S&D. I just dont want to slow down my computer or use alot of space for them. What would you recommend? I also have Windows Vista
bg_girl79 and candiedow you tardies, this is not about anti-Spyware tools, but antivirus ones.
I have a virus called win32usbservice.exe. I tried my AVG to scan it but the results were 0 but when I tried the other anti-viruses it popup and says treat detected. I say AVG were only limited unless you buy their original product AVG Pro.
how about mcafee..?
AVG sucks, McAfee too, Avast has always caught every bad thing that ever got onto this computer even before i could download it it stopped it, and for me it barely uses 5mb of ram, and to the person who needed antivirus for windows 98, get avast, it works with windows 95 and up, i've tried AVG myself and it sucks, never detected anything, even after i purposely downloaded well known viruses, but avast caught every virus i downloaded with no problems
Tried this site and it stated it's no longer available. AOL Active Virus Shield
u think this is still true in 2009?
Panda is the worst anti virus n00b
Type of bugs that can damage and ruin my computer. If you are like me and tired many different scans in the past looking for something that will protect and clean your computer, give Search-and-destroy Antispyware a try. I found that the antispyware solution from Search-and-destroy (http://www.Search-and-destroy.com) is an excellent choice. It’s less expensive than many of the other scans I’ve tired but it finds the same type of bugs that can damage and ruin my computer. I am so happy with this scanner that I want to tell everyone about it so you can give it a try to. I’m sure you will love it.
Every review i have ever read on the best Anti-Virus software has been totally different. I conclude that most reviews border on Bull Crap. I'm beginning to believe that these so called experts are getting padded pockets from these software Companies to promote their products
This article is so old that AOL does not even offer their Virus Shield for free, but is selling you a version of McAfee. Lets have an update here, OK? Best_Tech
avast is the best among the free antivirus software ..i have rated it 10/12 ..see my ratings and reviews on http://www.bestfreeantivirus4u.blogspot.com
3 yr old review. Time for an update?
We're Sorry! * AOL® Active Virus Shield is no longer available. * Looking for protection from viruses, spyware and hackers? * We are now offering McAfee® Virus Scan Plus-Special edition from AOL.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
46 Posted by bushongh on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:15PM EDT Report Abuse
I have used Spybot, Advanced Windows Care, and Grisoft Free AVG approximately 5 years, in that time I have seen only one Trojan Horse get through, and this was found within one week and removed. AOL has nothing to offer beyond their own spyware.....