When Is It Time To Get a New PC?

Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:19PM EDT

See Comments (313)

Reader John Coggins recently emailed me wondering whether it was time to upgrade his seven-year-old PC, even though it's working fine. That got me thinking about this post. All things considered... when should you upgrade your computer? Here are some rules of thumb to keep in mind.

  • Dead Components - Eventually your hard drive, optical drive, power supply, or motherboard will fail. These events can range from minor annoyances to catastrophic disasters, but depending on the age of the computer, any of them could be cause for upgrading to a new machine. Consider the power supply. Old, cheap power supplies are frequent failure points, and new supplies often don't fit in old cases and/or don't have the right connectors to work with old motherboards. You can hunt down compatible equipment and adapter cables, but even then it can be dicey installing it. Last time I upgraded an ancient computer's power supply I had to drill new holes in the case to line up the mounting screws properly. At some point, you might just say it's not worth the trouble and that it's time to dump the old PC and get a new one. On the other hand, motherboard meltdowns are usually so severe and expensive to repair that a new PC is in order right away.
  • New Software - Whether you should upgrade to Vista is a wholly separate discussion, but if you really want to run it, you're not going to be doing so on seven year-old hardware. When a new OS rolls around, you'll usually find online advisors that can evaluate whether your old PC is up to the task or whether you need an upgrade. You'll find the Vista Upgrade Advisor here. This is also good to think about if you are upgrading a major piece of software that you frequently use. If you find it runs very slowly on your old PC, it may be time for a new one (or at least some more RAM).
  • Valuing Your Time - Even with RAM upgrades and other internal tweaks, there's only so far you can upgrade any PC before maxing out its capabilities. And over time it will run slower and slower, especially as software (see above) gets larger and larger. If you find yourself launching applications, then wandering off to do something else while they finish loading, it's probably time for a new computer.
  • Compatibility - Newish features like Firewire and USB aren't available on old PCs. Not a problem if your parallel port printer is still running, but what happens when it croaks? You might need a new PC just to be compatible with peripherals you need (though add-in cards can be a stopgap measure). Ditto for software: An old operating system like Windows 98 or 2000 won't run most newly released titles.
  • Gaming - This almost goes without saying, but most gamers upgrade to new hardware every one or two years, simply to keep up with the extreme demands that the latest games place on their computers.

The bottom line: If you are using your PC for basic needs and it is serving you well, there is no reason to upgrade it just because it's getting old, unless you simply want to see what you're missing. With regular maintenance (particularly dusting inside the case), it should survive for a long while: 10, 15, even 20 years is not unheard of, though their utility dramatically diminishes after 10 years. That said, your risk of hardware failure increases as time wears on, as moving parts wear down and solder starts to become brittle and loose. Make sure your backups are up to date, no matter how young your computer might be.

Comments on When Is It Time To Get a New PC?

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 6 Posted by k3nt91 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:45PM EDT Report Abuse

    i think we should buy a new pc every 5 years. upgrading component is expensive because manufacture will not be produce old pc components. for example, a sd ram is far more expensive than ddr ram.

  • 7 Posted by ericvd22783 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:55PM EDT Report Abuse

    I agree with k3nt91, i sell/fix computers for a retail company, i usually tell people that if the computer is more then 4-5 yrs old and the repair costs cost more then 250ish then it is worth it to just buy a new computer, most lower end computer start at around 300-350ish and yes its lower end but it also is much better then what a 4-5 yr old computer is. but if your computer works fine then good use it till it breaks, i had a new unit (nVidia sli 68-i, 4gbs ddr2, Intel dual core e6400, twin 880gts VGC, 500gb HDD, etc etc, i sold it cause i needed the money to pay for school) i went back to my hp from 2004 (Intel p4 w/HT, 2gb DDR, 250 HDD, don't have a VGC YET) and you know what it works fine for what i use it for. but of course if you are a gamer (which i WAS) you need the best gear on the market just to be able to play ALLOT of the "new" games... well all i say is good luck too all the old computer owners cuz parts get VERY expensive (on a side note, vista works great don't be afraid to use it, just take your time cause most people lose patience thats why people don't like it)

  • 8 Posted by wmtyrancz on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have a p4 2.8 with 1.5 mg of ram running windows xp pro. I was also thinking about upgrading it. Come to find out it would be cheaper just to buy a new pc. I couldn't believe what they charge for a p4 3.8 cpu if you could even find one. I was quoted around 4 or 5 hundred dollars. I just hope i can get to use my own copy of xp pro. I'm in no hurry to use vista.

  • 9 Posted by judithmikesch on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:43PM EDT Report Abuse

    I'm tired of yahoo articles that, on the homepage, purport to be one thing, and then when you get to the article, they are not - whoever edits the main page ought to be fired

  • 10 Posted by rmammola on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:44PM EDT Report Abuse

    This article was ridiculously simplistic. Are your applications running slower than they used to? Gee, then maybe you should get a new computer. Get real, if you're going to set yourself up as an expert then give expert advice!

  • 12 Posted by lessimal on Thu Sep 3, 2009 6:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    Acer, E-Machines....you will get what you pay for. HP is the best by far and Dell next...I wouldn't bother with others due to cheap parts they use..

  • 13 Posted by nebula_43 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:35PM EDT Report Abuse

    To bad... the PC world cant leave some stuff well enough ALONE... like Oldversion.com says "Newer is NOT always better"... My OLD 1.3 Ghz processor does me just fine running on my 2000Pro machine, but for all the extra Software that has so many bells & whistles, that 1 needs a manual Jus tto figure out...

  • 14 Posted by dennisr99 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:41PM EDT Report Abuse

    Is my 386SX/12 out of date? I noticed that Yahoo doesn't load to quickly since it went graphical.

  • 15 Posted by luvslifedou on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:00PM EDT Report Abuse

    At this point, I don't rightly care if I get the latest and greatest. My computer runs fine, I keep the virus thing updated, and that's about it....it's 5 years old. You can keep your VISTAs to yourself folks...I stick with XP...

  • 16 Posted by micahhays1 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:17PM EDT Report Abuse

    Haha - I clicked to read this article but instead of an article I got this message: Uh oh! We're having server trouble. Our team is on it and we should have everything back to normal shortly. Please come back soon. Hum, I think they might need a new computer!

  • 17 Posted by ucdavisnum1 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:27PM EDT Report Abuse

    get a mac. Hands down the best computer on the market. If you don't agree, thats because you havn't tried it for a week.

  • 18 Posted by ck3sprout on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:26PM EDT Report Abuse

    Many of the average/non-technical home users I know who are running a Windows-based PC base their decision upon when to purchase a new unit by how much viruses and spyware have impacted their ability to do normal things like access the web, use email, etc. Once their system is crashing constantly, pop-ups have gotten out of control, and the system has slowed to a crawl, rather than pay somebody to come out and reinstall Windows and all their applications from scratch, and transfer their data over, they simply buy a new computer and start over - the cost of these consultants/tech's usually gets them well towards buying a replacement that's faster, so they don't see the point.

  • 19 Posted by omarhamid76 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:45PM EDT Report Abuse

    Just Get a Mac. Macs run windows now and are better machines, a little pricier but you'll get the bang for you buck.

  • 20 Posted by jp112259 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:42PM EDT Report Abuse

    I agree... I like to throw mine against the wall & get a new 1. :)

  • 22 Posted by benjaminslawson on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:05PM EDT Report Abuse

    Whether to upgrade comes down to one thing - $. Do you have it?

  • 23 Posted by jimpsusd on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:35PM EDT Report Abuse

    I just purchased a Dell Inspiron 530, for about $650. It included keyboard, optical mouse, 17" flat screen monitor, and all the software (and more---including voice recognition) most of us will ever need, running on Vista Home Premium. Oh, and a 1-year in-home warranty, expandable to 4 years for an additional $200. $650!!! Total! I may be way out of touch, but it seems to me that this is 2 Rolling Stones concert tickets. I don't know will go first, The Stones or the PC, but I'm very pleased.

  • 24 Posted by ladyredadept on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:55PM EDT Report Abuse

    Sometimes I think the machine you buy in the first place will determine how long it will last. 4 years ago I purchased a couple Dell desktops that are both still currently running and although occasionally a little slow they even run World of Warcraft just fine. Spending just a little bit more for the higher end can buy alot of time in how long it will last. Buying the 'cheap k-mart special' just because the price is right at the time will be a sure way to guarantee it wont last and the price will inevitable be much higher in the end when you have to replace it sooner.

  • 25 Posted by eanakpil on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:50PM EDT Report Abuse

    Wow, rogueist, what software are you using that you can't transfer the licenses and what do you have that is $25K? :-o Personally for me, I resisted upgrading my P4 3.0 GHz to a dual core for awhile but after I finally made the switch, Vista and all Adobe CS3 applications ran a lot faster. I don't game much but I do use lots of media editing software which chews up a lot of processor resources. I hated Vista at first as it was soooooooooo slow with my P4....I don't love it yet, but it's growing on me. I don't think upgrading every year or two is practical for most people but everyone should still do their own homework before committing to new hardware. Plus, new computers are so cheap these days anyways, even quality, brand name PCs can be had for under $600.

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.