Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:19PM EDT
See Comments (313)
Reader John Coggins recently emailed me wondering whether it was time to upgrade his seven-year-old PC, even though it's working fine. That got me thinking about this post. All things considered... when should you upgrade your computer? Here are some rules of thumb to keep in mind.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
I agree with k3nt91, i sell/fix computers for a retail company, i usually tell people that if the computer is more then 4-5 yrs old and the repair costs cost more then 250ish then it is worth it to just buy a new computer, most lower end computer start at around 300-350ish and yes its lower end but it also is much better then what a 4-5 yr old computer is. but if your computer works fine then good use it till it breaks, i had a new unit (nVidia sli 68-i, 4gbs ddr2, Intel dual core e6400, twin 880gts VGC, 500gb HDD, etc etc, i sold it cause i needed the money to pay for school) i went back to my hp from 2004 (Intel p4 w/HT, 2gb DDR, 250 HDD, don't have a VGC YET) and you know what it works fine for what i use it for. but of course if you are a gamer (which i WAS) you need the best gear on the market just to be able to play ALLOT of the "new" games... well all i say is good luck too all the old computer owners cuz parts get VERY expensive (on a side note, vista works great don't be afraid to use it, just take your time cause most people lose patience thats why people don't like it)
I have a p4 2.8 with 1.5 mg of ram running windows xp pro. I was also thinking about upgrading it. Come to find out it would be cheaper just to buy a new pc. I couldn't believe what they charge for a p4 3.8 cpu if you could even find one. I was quoted around 4 or 5 hundred dollars. I just hope i can get to use my own copy of xp pro. I'm in no hurry to use vista.
I'm tired of yahoo articles that, on the homepage, purport to be one thing, and then when you get to the article, they are not - whoever edits the main page ought to be fired
This article was ridiculously simplistic. Are your applications running slower than they used to? Gee, then maybe you should get a new computer. Get real, if you're going to set yourself up as an expert then give expert advice!
And what about us Mac users?
Acer, E-Machines....you will get what you pay for. HP is the best by far and Dell next...I wouldn't bother with others due to cheap parts they use..
To bad... the PC world cant leave some stuff well enough ALONE... like Oldversion.com says "Newer is NOT always better"... My OLD 1.3 Ghz processor does me just fine running on my 2000Pro machine, but for all the extra Software that has so many bells & whistles, that 1 needs a manual Jus tto figure out...
Is my 386SX/12 out of date? I noticed that Yahoo doesn't load to quickly since it went graphical.
At this point, I don't rightly care if I get the latest and greatest. My computer runs fine, I keep the virus thing updated, and that's about it....it's 5 years old. You can keep your VISTAs to yourself folks...I stick with XP...
Haha - I clicked to read this article but instead of an article I got this message: Uh oh! We're having server trouble. Our team is on it and we should have everything back to normal shortly. Please come back soon. Hum, I think they might need a new computer!
get a mac. Hands down the best computer on the market. If you don't agree, thats because you havn't tried it for a week.
Many of the average/non-technical home users I know who are running a Windows-based PC base their decision upon when to purchase a new unit by how much viruses and spyware have impacted their ability to do normal things like access the web, use email, etc. Once their system is crashing constantly, pop-ups have gotten out of control, and the system has slowed to a crawl, rather than pay somebody to come out and reinstall Windows and all their applications from scratch, and transfer their data over, they simply buy a new computer and start over - the cost of these consultants/tech's usually gets them well towards buying a replacement that's faster, so they don't see the point.
Just Get a Mac. Macs run windows now and are better machines, a little pricier but you'll get the bang for you buck.
I agree... I like to throw mine against the wall & get a new 1. :)
Get a mac.
Whether to upgrade comes down to one thing - $. Do you have it?
I just purchased a Dell Inspiron 530, for about $650. It included keyboard, optical mouse, 17" flat screen monitor, and all the software (and more---including voice recognition) most of us will ever need, running on Vista Home Premium. Oh, and a 1-year in-home warranty, expandable to 4 years for an additional $200. $650!!! Total! I may be way out of touch, but it seems to me that this is 2 Rolling Stones concert tickets. I don't know will go first, The Stones or the PC, but I'm very pleased.
Sometimes I think the machine you buy in the first place will determine how long it will last. 4 years ago I purchased a couple Dell desktops that are both still currently running and although occasionally a little slow they even run World of Warcraft just fine. Spending just a little bit more for the higher end can buy alot of time in how long it will last. Buying the 'cheap k-mart special' just because the price is right at the time will be a sure way to guarantee it wont last and the price will inevitable be much higher in the end when you have to replace it sooner.
Wow, rogueist, what software are you using that you can't transfer the licenses and what do you have that is $25K? :-o Personally for me, I resisted upgrading my P4 3.0 GHz to a dual core for awhile but after I finally made the switch, Vista and all Adobe CS3 applications ran a lot faster. I don't game much but I do use lots of media editing software which chews up a lot of processor resources. I hated Vista at first as it was soooooooooo slow with my P4....I don't love it yet, but it's growing on me. I don't think upgrading every year or two is practical for most people but everyone should still do their own homework before committing to new hardware. Plus, new computers are so cheap these days anyways, even quality, brand name PCs can be had for under $600.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 Posted by k3nt91 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:45PM EDT Report Abuse
i think we should buy a new pc every 5 years. upgrading component is expensive because manufacture will not be produce old pc components. for example, a sd ram is far more expensive than ddr ram.