Windows Vista Service Pack 1: No Performance Boost

Tue Nov 20, 2007 11:46AM EST

See Comments (24)

The first testing reports are in: Windows Vista's Service Pack 1 is unlikely to offer any improvement in performance, one of users' biggest complaints about the new OS, over the version of Vista you have already.

Benchmarks were performed by exo.performance.network under a variety of scenarios, using the latest beta of SP1 (which was recently made available to a wide assortment of testers). The results are largely unimpressive: With general productivity applications Vista SP1 showed a slight (2 percent) performance drop vs. out-of-the-box Vista or a statistically insignificant difference. The results were about the same for database applications, too (see chart above): SP1 offers no improvement, but it doesn't really hurt, either.

Though it's not the speed boon we'd been hoping for, it's important to remember that Windows Service Packs rarely improve performance at all. In fact, when Windows XP Service Pack 2 was released, most systems saw a substantial performance drop (my tests at the time pegged it at an average of 9 percent). But SP2's many improvements to OS stability and added features like the Windows Firewall easily made it a must-have addition. That's the same hope here, that while Vista SP1 may not make your computer scream (the study authors note that it is Vista's architecture that makes it so slow, and no amount of fine-tuning is going to fix that), at least it might remedy some of the (numerous) other annoyances about Vista.

LINK: Vista SP1 a Performance Dud

Comments on Windows Vista Service Pack 1: No Performance Boost

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 6 Posted by rosesisland2000 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:51PM EDT Report Abuse

    No one likes change, and, change is hard. I like it. Yes, it takes some getting used to, but, hey you want to go back to DOS?

  • 8 Posted by twalro on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:25PM EDT Report Abuse

    Rosesisland, I don't think anyone wants to go back to DOS. What we want is an operating system that isn't buggy, isn't totally insecure, doesn't require hardware that is an order of mangnitude more powerful just to run it and and works with standard PC hardware out of the box, pretty much everything that Vista isn't.

  • 10 Posted by gagfilms on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:05PM EDT Report Abuse

    All the more reason to switch to Apple!

  • 11 Posted by jdurant37 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:31PM EDT Report Abuse

    I love vista. It looks cool and ran fine once i updated it. Tell your grandma to try try to connect to a wireless network using linux...good luck. And the easy of .net and VB programing for in house works apps is great.

  • 12 Posted by magpagbst on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:03PM EDT Report Abuse

    Hmmmmmmm . . . Windows Vista . . . I compare it to dating a gorgeous blond (theoreticly speaking - as I've never actually dated a gorgeous blond). . . she'll look great on your arm, but there is no way in heck she's going to cook for you . . . Windows XP, a little pudgy with a crooked nose. . . but made a great souffle!!

  • 13 Posted by jameslongstrider on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:28PM EDT Report Abuse

    12, that's the best OS analogy I've ever heard, As for number 8, what's so bad about DOS? some of my favorite apps and games were DOS based, and I still remember enough of it to still make it usable. (Just wish more of today's apps would run well in DOS, as well as a good internet browser.)

  • 14 Posted by rcmit on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:31PM EDT Report Abuse

    Macs just keep looking better and better. Maybe Balmer's Bomb (aka, Vista) will provide the biggest sales boost that Apple has ever seen.

  • 15 Posted by pcofmind1 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:04PM EDT Report Abuse

    I live next-door to an I.T. professor at a local college who is a total Apple Evangelist. His license-plate frame says "Blah Blah Blah... Get a Mac". It is really quite simple: Regardless of your personal preferences/habits/addictions (i.e. you're a slave to Microsoft), Apple simply makes a superior operating system. Out of the box, everything "just works" (and has the market cornered in the "cool factor" in design and functionality). I see myself cutting the cord to Microsoft and going to a Mac some day in the not-too-distant future. We should all be so smart.

  • 16 Posted by buzpt1959 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:15PM EDT Report Abuse

    Sorry. I'll admit it. I love Vista! Why? Because it works for me.

  • 17 Posted by simulation90 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:23PM EDT Report Abuse

    To 15: The reason Vista is slow in comparasion to a Mac, is because Mac's base hardware (their lowest costing computer) starts at a much higher level than PC's. And Apple controls the hardware aspect of their computers, so you can always be sure there is no problems with your hardware. With Leopard, Apple provides only a couple of themes for the look of the OS and most aspects of the look are completely uncustamizable. Vista comes with about seven Aero and Vista Classic themes, and about twenty Windows Classic themes, plus the ability to change the colors to whatever you want with the color chooser. Third-party programs can make Vista look like anything you want.

  • 18 Posted by diximage on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:44PM EDT Report Abuse

    As usual. What do you expect from M$??

  • 19 Posted by gratavideo on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:12PM EDT Report Abuse

    seriously if i were to buy a new pc, i would clean it off and install xp pro, oh but i just got 2 macs in the last 2 months...and today i saw 11 people walking out of the store with macs in the 10 minutes i was there. notice that pc labtops are going on sale cheaper than the cost of Vista. THEY CANT GIVE THESE THINGS AWAY!

  • 20 Posted by der0ss on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:41PM EDT Report Abuse

    Linux in a business environment is funny. Why, it doesn't happen other than for servers and loser tasks like email haha. Played any fun Linux games? Found anything that is "new", nope it is all 90's retreads rebuilt for Linux. Of course this ignores the fact that they were available back then and no one wanted them in the first place. Want to run a business on the cheap? You shouldn't be in business to begin with as you have forgotten that communications is key, and Linux doesn't play like that. I guess the proof to me is that every "new"x basically adds another feature already readily available on MAC and Win OS's

  • 21 Posted by ybotherasking on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:55PM EDT Report Abuse

    Uhhh, der0ss... I think you forgot to mention Linux is free and that's why most people get it. Not because they're trying to compete in a business environment where Windows is the undisputed leader. If you take the time to add some other free utilities like Firefox, Thunderbird, OpenOffice, etc. you get a pretty decent OS for much less than Windows or Mac. Did I mention it's all free?

  • 22 Posted by vochoa0371 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:38PM EDT Report Abuse

    I am not computer expert but how easy is it to convert any PC with Linux? Does it automatically detect the drivers? Does one have to get the drivers from somewhere to configure them once you install the Linux OS? It is free, but does not sound like a headache free OS... Well, I supposse if one all ready knows the bells and whistles it is okay to say go with free... Windows XP has been very reliable for almost 9 or ten years. I can't say anything about Vista for I have not used it. I just like the Mac and Vista commercials. They are hilareous.

  • 24 Posted by jasonreinders@rogers.com on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:29PM EDT Report Abuse

    You don't have to buy it. You get it free as an update, maybe you should read the articles again.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.