Firefox 3.0 First Beta Arrives

Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:19PM EST

See Comments (6)

It seems like only yesterday when Firefox 2.0 arrived, and here we're already swimming with the first beta of Firefox 3.0. I have been using Firefox 2 as my primary browser for several months and have really grown to love it. So how will Firefox 3 improve on things?

The Firefox development blog post relegates the biggest issue to its last bullet point: Performance improvements, including over 300 memory leak fixes, perennial problems with Firefox since the beginning and an issue that plagues it badly today. (Even after quitting the browser entirely, I'll often find in Task Manager that Firefox is still using 200MB of RAM or more. Crazy.) In my preliminary tests Firefox 3 does seem quite a bit speedier than version 2, though I don't have specific benchmarks to support that. (However, in this beta, at least, Firefox still appears to be a memory hog.)

Many of Firefox 3's new features focus on making the browser easier to use and, more importantly, making it easier to find what you're looking for. Intuitive search features auto-scour your history and bookmarks for visited URLs and even page titles, making it easier to find "lost" pages as you type. Bookmarking is easier to do (just one click) and organization of bookmarks is also improved.

Security improvements have also been promised. Though Firefox has traditionally been less prone to malware than Internet Explorer, it's still had a succession of security patches issued, usually once a month or so. A variety of security enhancements are on tap, including better integration with antivirus software and a malware protection system.

You can see other features planned for Firefox 3 at this blog post.

While Firefox 3 Beta 1 is freely available for download, it's not recommended for general users at this time. There are still plenty of bugs in the system, some pages won't render right, and, most importantly, very few Firefox 2 add-ins work with Firefox 3 at all (not even toolbars).

Additional hands-on perspectives on the browser can be found at CNet, ZDNet, and Ars Technica. Stay tuned for additional news as Firefox 3 inches closer to launch.

Comments on Firefox 3.0 First Beta Arrives

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 2 Posted by caarnquist on Thu Nov 22, 2007 9:09PM EST Report Abuse

    I hope it also has compatibility updates for some games that only work with IE. Most of the time I use IE but Firefox is fast, and that's why I'm saying. . .

  • 3 Posted by blader3759 on Fri Nov 23, 2007 12:16AM EST Report Abuse

    Why does Firefox still keep using memory even after being closed? 200MB? Wow. I guess this would be the first con I can think of, of using Firefox. Regardless, I love Firefox.

  • 4 Posted by asa_dotzler on Fri Nov 23, 2007 12:50AM EST Report Abuse

    I think we've got to the root of the problem that Duncan at TechCrunch experienced and some other Firefox 3 Beta 1 testers are seeing. Starting Tuesday, we began receiving reports, like yours, of a new memory/cpu usage issue that happens shortly after a normal startup and can spike the CPU and chew up hundreds of MB of RAM. This is apparently happening to people with new profiles or in profiles that have a very outdated list of bad sites for the Phishing Protection feature and the Malware Protection feature. What's going on is that soon after Firefox is started, Firefox tries to fetch updates to the site forgery and malware lists -- the lists of bad sites that allows Firefox to warn users about suspected Phishing and Attack sites. If the profile has very outdated or no local lists, as is the case for a new Firefox profile, Firefox is trying to bring down these rather large lists in one big chunk rather than slowly in small chunks. This causes Firefox to consume large amounts of CPU and memory and can slow the users machine to a crawl. This problem is due to the change in the "SafeBrowsing Protocol" which only affects Firefox 3 Beta 1 and nightly build users. If you're on Firefox 2, this isn't going to affect you. The work-around for this problem was for us to throttle it on the server side. We've done that so things should be good now. - A

  • 5 Posted by oldfart615 on Fri Nov 23, 2007 4:50PM EST Report Abuse

    Chris, thanks for making us aware of this. Firefox is a vastly superior browser. I suspect that I am just one of a great many people anxiously awaiting the release of Firefox 3.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment

 

Sign In to see your profile information, saved products and more...

Register Sign In

My Favorite Gadgets

 

Recent Activity

 

Recently Viewed

on | off on | off
 

Recent Searches

on | off on | off
 
 
 

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.