Web Software Shift Creates a Performance Roadblock

Mon Dec 10, 2007 4:48PM EST

See Comments (2)

An interesting observation today from one IT blog, which notes astutely that our increasing reliance on web-based applications over traditional software programs is creating a performance problem, since web software is not really designed to take advantage of multiple CPU cores, which are now ubiquitous in all forms of computers, desktop and laptop.

Multicore CPUs today offer two, three, or four "cores" that can execute instructions independently. Ideally, a dual-core CPU could run one program twice as fast, or two programs together just as fast as a single-core CPU could run the same application. That's simplifying things, of course, but you get the idea. Most desktop software is now written (or quickly being rewritten) with multicore CPUs in mind.

But that doesn't translate to the web, where apps are hosted on servers instead of locally on your machine (though a combination of remote and local processing is also common). But the big issue is that, per the story, web browsers just aren't designed with multicore in mind. Even tabbed browsing isn't currently set up to split tasks among multiple cores.

While we ponder the massive architectural changes needed on the software front, this is something important to consider if you're buying a new computer. Yes, dual- and quad-core computers offer unilaterally better performance on general software apps and benchmarks (and will even boot up faster), but that performance won't really translate to refreshing your webmail or running Google Docs and Spreadsheets. Many people write to me saying they want a new computer because their web browser is very slow, and while a new PC can help a little, it's not going to be a substantially different experience. Bottom line: If zippy web browsing is what you're after, you're better off investing in a faster Internet connection than a cutting-edge computer.

LINK: Web browsers are limiting the benefits of multi-core CPUs

Comments on Web Software Shift Creates a Performance Roadblock

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by rogueist on Mon Dec 10, 2007 8:34PM EST Report Abuse

    Tell this to the connection providers, and tell them to stop limiting the upstream connection, because this is where the bottleneck is happening - we need matching upstream and downstream data speeds in order to properly run the applications of the future, and not more of these "bandwidth restrictions" - we are the lowest speed in the totem pole worldwide for internet access. How come the US lags so far behind everyone else? Cant we be number 1 anymore?

  • 2 Posted by ldavid6161 on Sat Jan 5, 2008 4:12PM EST Report Abuse

    I asked one of the service people when they were going to have service in my area for a higher speed connection than I have now. He said to call my congress, city, and state officals and ask them. Seems they have there hands in the pie again and again and again etc. We all have to make a fuss. And the providers aren;t any better. Everybody wants something for nothing and we smucks get the shaft you know where. I'll leave it there. VOTE FOR SOMEONE WHO CARES!!!

More Posts: First Prev 1 Next Last

Post a Comment

 

Sign In to see your profile information, saved products and more...

Register Sign In

My Favorite Gadgets

 

Recent Activity

 

Recently Viewed

on | off on | off
 

Recent Searches

on | off on | off
 
 
 

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.