Mon Dec 10, 2007 4:48PM EST
See Comments (2)
An interesting observation today from one IT blog, which notes astutely that our increasing reliance on web-based applications over traditional software programs is creating a performance problem, since web software is not really designed to take advantage of multiple CPU cores, which are now ubiquitous in all forms of computers, desktop and laptop.
Multicore CPUs today offer two, three, or four "cores" that can execute instructions independently. Ideally, a dual-core CPU could run one program twice as fast, or two programs together just as fast as a single-core CPU could run the same application. That's simplifying things, of course, but you get the idea. Most desktop software is now written (or quickly being rewritten) with multicore CPUs in mind.
But that doesn't translate to the web, where apps are hosted on servers instead of locally on your machine (though a combination of remote and local processing is also common). But the big issue is that, per the story, web browsers just aren't designed with multicore in mind. Even tabbed browsing isn't currently set up to split tasks among multiple cores.
While we ponder the massive architectural changes needed on the software front, this is something important to consider if you're buying a new computer. Yes, dual- and quad-core computers offer unilaterally better performance on general software apps and benchmarks (and will even boot up faster), but that performance won't really translate to refreshing your webmail or running Google Docs and Spreadsheets. Many people write to me saying they want a new computer because their web browser is very slow, and while a new PC can help a little, it's not going to be a substantially different experience. Bottom line: If zippy web browsing is what you're after, you're better off investing in a faster Internet connection than a cutting-edge computer.
LINK: Web browsers are limiting the benefits of multi-core CPUs
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
I asked one of the service people when they were going to have service in my area for a higher speed connection than I have now. He said to call my congress, city, and state officals and ask them. Seems they have there hands in the pie again and again and again etc. We all have to make a fuss. And the providers aren;t any better. Everybody wants something for nothing and we smucks get the shaft you know where. I'll leave it there. VOTE FOR SOMEONE WHO CARES!!!
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by rogueist on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:49PM EDT Report Abuse
Tell this to the connection providers, and tell them to stop limiting the upstream connection, because this is where the bottleneck is happening - we need matching upstream and downstream data speeds in order to properly run the applications of the future, and not more of these "bandwidth restrictions" - we are the lowest speed in the totem pole worldwide for internet access. How come the US lags so far behind everyone else? Cant we be number 1 anymore?