Mon Dec 17, 2007 8:04PM EST
See Comments (8)
Previously I've discussed the development of USB 3.0, a 4.8Gbps technology in the works for 2009. Naturally, competition is also in the works: FireWire, the oft-maligned and seldom-used connector, will offer its third incarnation, called S3200, a roughly 3.2Gbps system.
Unless you're a Mac owner, you may not even realize that a second version of FireWire exists. Standard FireWire, or FireWire 400 (which uses that arch-shaped connector on almost every desktop and an M-shaped mini-plug on virtually every laptop), was just the first round of this technology, running at 400Mbps, comparable to USB 2.0. An 800Mbps version of FireWire, called FireWire 800, followed shortly after, but adoption was minimal at best. To date, very few computers or peripherals offer FireWire 800 connections, in large part because the connector is completely different than FireWire 400. (It looks something like a fat USB connector; see the above photo for a picture.)
FireWire S3200 could be approved as early as February of next year, giving it a big jump on USB 3.0... but will people install add-in cards to handle the incompatible connectors? Historically, uptake on products requiring new connectors has been slow, waiting until computer manufacturers began putting the connectors right on the motherboard to pick up steam.
Also expect the "which is better?" debate to rear up once again. USB and FireWire enthusiasts have long argued over how meaningful those theoretical transfer rates are, and sure enough, 480Mbps USB generally underperforms vs. 400Mbps FireWire in the real world, due to architectural overhead. Will 4.8Gbps USB be faster than 3.2Gbps FireWire? We'll have to see, when both are represented by finished, shipping products.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
Who wants competition? darn capitalists.
Nice connection speeds, but USB has gone wireless now (caught you all sleeping didnt I) - yep thats right, wireless. So no, Firewire is not going to take off, Wireless USB is.
Wireless USB is terrible... and basically has no bearing on actual USB except in name. http://tech.yahoo.com/blog/null/49399
It's B.S. to say that firewire is not used very often. EVERY Mac user uses their FW port for a myriad of uses from importing digital video to migrating files and users preferences from one machine to another to hooking up external harddrives. Windows users could do the same if they have a firewire port or card in their machine. One great function of firewire is being able to daisy-chain multiple external harddrives together and still only use 1 port on your Mac. Just because Mac has a small market share compared to Windows-based machines doesn't mean the firewire technology is insignificant. As for usefulness, both USB and Firewire are great and I use both on a daily basis from flash drives to portable HDs to printers.
The newest TiVo is now high-definition and is available for $300. Looks like your HDTV has a new bes ...
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by somebodys_here on Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:08PM EST Report Abuse
I'd prefer a FireWire connection to USB but unfortunately I can't connect my iPod to my PC with FireWire because of incomparability issues. It would make the transfer a lot faster. I have a SATA 300 HDD and when I transfer any file over about 250MB it only takes a few seconds, while the USB port takes about a minute. This would be much better for productivity.