Tue Jan 1, 2008 12:01AM EST
See Comments (130)
I'm back! Did ya miss me? Hey, thanks. Let's start off your '08 with some good old-fashioned news about air travel, a big mess of new rules that are sure to confuse and entertain you all year. This time, the FAA has taken aim at lithium batteries, a response to the bevy of exploding laptops that menaced offices and airports alike over the last two years (one of which occured at LAX).
The new rules are confusing and extensive (and are being reported incorrectly in numerous mainstream publications), so I'll try to boil it down for you here, accurately. Hit the link at the end of the story for the entire text of the new rules straight from the horse's mouth. The rules took effect on Jan. 1, 2008.
Whew! Bottom line: Most travelers are fine as they are now, especially if they don't bring along spare batteries. If you do carry spares, take a look at the FAA's safety tips, which advise placing spare cells in a plastic bag to prevent short circuits. Just make sure those spares aren't too big, and only carry two.
LINK: FAA Battery Rules 2008
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
how much further is this crap gonna go has their been any threats none that i know come this is getting old fast!!!!!!!!!!!!11111
Yes- and I can just imagine the MIT grads at airport security calculating watt-hours!
OK. TSA and governmental scare-mongers aside, rather than doing the dreaded MATH, can we just have a list of battery driven devices that we CAN take on planes? Oh, excuse me, jets. I wanna take iPod, cell phone (don't mind turning it off when necessary), and my watch. And, no, I am not going to take all the batteries out just to do some unnecessary math. I like words. Please list what normal devices I CAN take!!
I can't believe that people who claim that TSA screeners are not too bright can't read and understand that this has NOTHING to do with security, terrorism or the TSA!!! This is a SAFETY rule implimented by the US DOT in order to ensure that improperly packed batteries do not cause a fire aboard the same aircraft on which you are traveling. There are many documented case of ACCIDENTAL (nothing to do with security or terrorism) fires cause by improperly packed batteries causing such fires. If you do not mind being in a long metal tube traveling hundreds of mile per hour, thousands of feet above the earth when that fire breaks out then you can just ignore this rule because it is inconvenient or because you do not take the time to read what it really says. Let's hope the other people on the plane with you care enough about their own safety not to be reckless enough to throw a handful of loose batteries into their baggage along with their belt buckles, aerosol cans, jewelry, change or any other metal that can cause them to short circuit.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
126 Posted by billkritzer on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:08PM EDT Report Abuse
Thank you for the update regarding the security regulations at the airports..Just like everything else in the government, here is another example of the INEFFICIENCY of our institution. First it was the shoes, then the beginning of the the 3.0+ ounce rule in a quart size bag, and now we have to worry about batteries. Do you honestly think that they EVER look at the contents of the "liquids, powders or gels" in the bag. How easy would it be to put fertilzer and gasoline in the small 3 oz vials and know one would ever know??? Get a grip and try not to micromanage the American public.