Why We Did It: Warner Explains Its Move to Blu-ray (Interview)

Fri Jan 4, 2008 9:11PM EST

See Comments (47)

Today Warner Bros. became the latest (and final) studio to pick a side in the high-def DVD battle. Until now, it was the only major studio left that was producing discs using both HD DVD and Blu-ray technology.

Warner Home Entertainment president Kevin Tsujihara spoke to a handful of us tech bloggers today to further explain why WB made the decision it did.

In a nutshell, Tsujihara said that WB had been "monitoring the [high-def] situation closely" and felt it was time to pick a side. The big problem? "Consumer confusion was beginning to happen even with standard-definition DVD," he said. "Both formats were having an impact that caused consumers to say, let's wait a bit to buy anything, even a standard-definition DVD. We were starting to see the worst of all worlds: No one was buying high-def and not buying standard-def either."

The argument that confusion between HD DVD and Blu-ray was causing people not to buy either high-def format has been with us for a while, but this is the first time I've heard anyone make the connection to declining regular DVD sales. It makes sense, though. If you, as a consumer, feel a (real) move to a new standard is imminent, you're not going to buy the old one. Industry-wide, total DVD sales fell 4.5 percent last year, a huge decline that has some insiders nervous.

Tsujihara said that, not including WB's blockbuster "Planet Earth" release, the company had already been selling 60 percent of its high-def titles in Blu-ray format in the U.S. But that figure was 70-plus percent in Europe and 90-plus percent in Japan.

In addressing the oft-rumored "marketing compensation" paid to studios for switching high-def sides (aka payola), Tsujihara laughed and joked that he had heard these rumors too and was anxious to see such a check. "It's not a bidding war," he said. "It's all about what's best strategically for us." That said, he curiously didn't outright state that no payment had been received by Warner for dumping HD DVD. Not that it matters, I suppose. All's fair in love and home video.

Comments on Why We Did It: Warner Explains Its Move to Blu-ray (Interview)

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 26 Posted by dnjensen@pacbell.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:45PM EDT Report Abuse

    Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhggggggg!!!!!!!!Nobody, not one of you, gets it. Blu-Ray, HDDVD, DVD,Beta,VHS,Laser Disk? Vinyl, 8-Tracks, Cassettes, CDs, MP3,iPods. Pictures, Motion Pictures, Motion Pictures with Sound and Color, Television, Color Television, Hi-Fidelity, Stereo, Quadrafonic, DolbyNR, Dolby Surround, Dolby Pro Logic, DolbyDTS, THX, Dolby Digital. Do you get it now, do you? Well then you never will.

  • 27 Posted by vochoa0371 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:38PM EDT Report Abuse

    Stop crying. Just enjoy the movie in 1080p format. Who cares about HD or Blu-Ray war?

  • 28 Posted by spikelie_007 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:36PM EDT Report Abuse

    the war will soon be over. and blu-ray is clearly the winner! HD-DVD is good, but Blu-Ray is better! some people really can't understand why warner bros. went to blu-ray... its all because blu-ray is far better than hd-dvd. and besides, blu-ray has a higher capacity than hd-dvd. now, let's see how long will paramount will stay on hd-dvd's side! haha! the next thing we will know is that paramount is on the blu-ray side! haha! i feel sorry for xbox fans! no blu-ray! you've just wasted your $150 for the hd-dvd player for xbox! hahahaha!

  • 29 Posted by prettymercy_2458 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:18PM EDT Report Abuse

    unfortunately BD may win the battle i personally prefer HD but when the copy protection is broken and BD disks come out with 2 or 3 HD movies will make the studios happy!! and then they will lose many more millions of $$$ if they had gone HD and lowered the movie prices to lower than standard dvd rices then they perhaps may have made considerably more money, i will be happy to own a HD recorder and just record from free to air TV

  • 30 Posted by sonni88 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:32PM EDT Report Abuse

    I'm glad that BD is wiinning the war. So many HD supporters whinning about it too. Bunch of cry babies. I really hope they stay loyal to the sinking ship that is HD-DVD. Maybe afterwards they will support VHS tapes because they can't stand admitting defeat! LOL!

  • 31 Posted by pan_mos on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:59PM EDT Report Abuse

    Sure. BluRay is expensive, but to be honest, when you think long-term, BluRay has the capacity to handle more content as far as movies and games are concerned. Don't think NOW as the next hi-def format should be around for 5-10 years, and you need capacity for it. HD-DVD is a great format, but unless you come up with 50GB (DL) HD-DVDs, comparing these 2 formats are like comparing cds and dvds...

  • 32 Posted by bstockstill2007 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:14PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have a PS3 (Blue Ray) and a new Toshiba laptop with HD DVD. Which one was I pulling my hair out trying to get to play a new format DVD? The Toshiba laptop. It required several firmware and software updates. After I got it working I can plug my laptop into my TV and it will play HD DVDs in HD on my TV. But that was a whole other battle to figure out how to do that (DVI to HDMI, etc). I have not ever had a problem playing Blu Ray. I buy both and see no picture quality difference. But no matter who wins the war, both sides need to make combo DVDs that play in older players too. So far, I have only seen HD DVD combo discs. We all need to push that to the studios.

  • 33 Posted by rpoffen on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:53PM EDT Report Abuse

    For me it was a no-brainer. My son has a PS3, which we got him for reasons other than playing BD, but since we have it, and he isn't playing it 24/7, we use it to play BD movies with no further investmnent. At the latest prices of $399, it is a pretty good deal. Gaming console (with WiFi and web capability) + BD player for about the price of a standalone BD player.

  • 34 Posted by chickenhounk911 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:23PM EDT Report Abuse

    So.... I am an HD DVD supporter and I am saddened by this decision. This means though, that we can expect to see some of the cooler HD DVD's in the bargain bin! Hooray for that. With all that money I am gonna save, I can save up for s PS3 and use that as my Blu Ray player. Happy ending for everyone.

  • 35 Posted by statfig on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:39PM EDT Report Abuse

    I second rasincero's comments ... time to become an adult.

  • 36 Posted by excalifur22x on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:57PM EDT Report Abuse

    HD-DVD is just DVD on steroids. Blu-Ray blows HD-DVD out of the water. Im glad I bought a PS3. Money well spent because not only I get to watch Blu-Ray movies but also get to play games offline and online on PS3. I know its expensive but Blu-Ray prices have come down and will continue to go down. Blu-Ray format and movies out sold HD-DVD and their movies. I believe soon the war will be over and Blu-Ray will be victorious. Then the people who hates Blu-Ray will end up getting one,lol.

  • 37 Posted by wadep66 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:38PM EDT Report Abuse

    I agree with rpoffen. I bought the PS3 because I got a blu-ray player (highly rated I might add), plus a game system, plus an audio player with wifi, etc. The BD is superior technology and has more space as has been stated. Ultimately the studios will use all this space and HD DVD will not be able to keep up. If you buy an X-box, then you have to sheck out additional money for what then becomes an add-on. Not good. Those comparing this to the betamax war are forgetting that like Apple with their Mac, Sony did not liscense this technology, so the cheaper VHS players came in and stole the market share. That is why it failed. This is not the same case. There are lots of sales and more savvy consumers are choosing the superior format. The better product is winning in the competetive market. Anyone who has bought either player has known they are on the bleeding edge of technology and are taking a risk. Get over your anger and get with the winning team.

  • 38 Posted by quatro2b on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:24PM EDT Report Abuse

    The truth is that the "War" isn't about the technology, and hasn't been for the last year. Both formats give generous eye candy over DVD. The War is about market share and the number of titles available. It's been a numbers game from the beginning and whoever sold more players in any form was going to win. In this case it's BluRay, in part because of the PS3 and in part because of agreements with the studios. Ending the war quickly is what's best for the industry because it will allow all the people who are investing in HiDef TV's to utilize another source. The market share for these players is for people who purchased $1000-5000 TV's so a $300 player isn't that big of a deal, although the sweet spot for BluRay is around $200 to take it mainstream. I chose BluRay a long time ago because of these factors and not the technical nuances of each format. WarnerBros made the right decision to help end the war, even though some companies will lose Billions. Competition in this arena isn't helping the industry or consumers. And it has to be frustrating for both sides to see some of their favorite movies not being offered or available in their format. I too have waited to purchase a standard DVD in anticipation of going Blu, so strategically it was a sound decision.

  • 39 Posted by das_jeremy on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:37PM EDT Report Abuse

    before in the beta max vs vhs wars the battle went in favor of the "adult" entertainment industry. as such sony decided that those will never be made on blue ray technology so in the long run if you enjoy pornography you will have to go hd dvd

  • 40 Posted by goingpostal2@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:11PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have supported Sony for many years. 8mm video, dvd player. reciever, hard drive video and and on and on. In that time, it took a class action law suit to replace a defective dvd player and an 8mm video cam that worked for one year. My daughters friend just purchased a Sony HDTV and it bit the dust. The kicker? He has tried to get the thing fixed under warranty and they will not fix it even when it is still under warranty. He has even talked to high execs. My days with Sony are over! My question is, what kind of support will they give this?

  • 41 Posted by hedo4three2002 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:18PM EDT Report Abuse

    I really dont understand the battle...Blu-Ray is the future so studios obviously decided that you might as well get in the game now...

  • 42 Posted by danbaek on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:34PM EDT Report Abuse

    I already have been to the future and came back. The winner is..............none of them. IT JUST WILL BE DOWNLOADED or transfered over to flash drive like some data.

  • 43 Posted by kenn777 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    That's me. I was considering buying a DVD recorder but why buy a standard DVD recorder when there will be a blue ray or hd dvd format out soon. So I didn't buy anything. No new hardware until someone lands on a square. I was around for the VHS vs. Bata wars back in the 80's. Didn't want to end up on the wrong side of the technology this time. Movies I bought though. Mostly because of the declining prices and because my Panasonic up converts most standard DVDs to a fantastic picture on my Panasonic plasma set.

  • 44 Posted by motor8@sbcglobal.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:26PM EDT Report Abuse

    History lesson: Sony's greed and short sightedness in developing and marketing its superior Betamax technology resulted in Beta's demise. If Sony had licensed its technology, as VHS did, it surely would have become the dominant format. Similar to the greed and short sightedness displayed by Apple in failing to license its technology. IBM threw open the door to all comers and the (arguably) inferior PC dominates to this day. In this most recent battle of competing technologies it would appear Sony has chosen not to repeat history. In my opinion, BD is the superior technology and hopefullly this time it won't fall by the wayside because of an unenlightened corporate strategy.

  • 45 Posted by makoto3839 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:04PM EDT Report Abuse

    anyone know what a red camera is? They're beginning to use them for films. I believe its roughly 16x better quality than your standard HD image and they are gaining popularity. If the movie industry happens to move in that direction it may have a impact on which platform is a good choice. just thought i'd throw that out there.

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.