Mon Jan 7, 2008 6:53PM EST
See Comments (731)
It's the elephant in the living room: Panasonic's 150-inch plasma has all but stolen the show here at CES 2008. When people ask you "What's the coolest thing you've seen at the show so far?" they invariably follow that up with "Except for the 150-inch TV."
And sure enough, the thing is a marvel to behold. It's so big, it's hard to take it in, really. With a viewing area that measures 11 feet by 6 1/4 feet and 8.84 million pixels of resolution, the TV (which has no model number and no date for being commercialized) is regularly thronged by crowds of slack-jawed onlookers, unable to comprehend the thing.
It's so big that all the other flat-panel companies have simply removed signage that might indicate how big (er, small) their sets are in comparison. There are obviously some big sets here from Pioneer, LG, and Sharp, but exactly how big their biggest sets are remains a mystery. Next year I will have to bring a tape measure.
Still don't think it's big? After all, maybe that woman is incredibly short, right? Wrong. Here's a picture of it next to last-year's largest, the 103-inch plasma:
With the war on screen size all but lost for 2008, a more interesting one is shaping up on thickness, with vendors battling to see just how thin they can make their displays. Virtually every vendor is offering a screen (LCD or plasma) less than 2 inches thick. LG's is 1.7 inches thick. Hitachi's plasma is 1.5 inches and its LCD is just 0.75 inch. Sharp also has a 0.8-inch-thick LCD (52 inches diagonally, too). But it's Pioneer's 0.35-inch plasma that takes the weight loss crown, even if it is a prototype.
Other TV trends continue apace: A big one is OLED, which both Sony and Samsung are moving forward impressively. Side by side, Samsung's technology demo of OLED vs. LCD is striking; the difference in color and brightness is astonishing. Meanwhile, Sony was demonstrating a 27-inch OLED set, too. (In related news, you'll finally be able to buy the 11-inch OLED here in the United States, for just $2,500.)
Also emerging: Wireless HD. While I'm not sold on the need for this technology, more and more products keep showing up with it. Will we replace HDMI cables with wireless connections? Your sense of tidiness is probably salivating over the prospect already.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
i need that beast for my playstation 3..and my midget porn.
I would like to see some HD porn on that TV !
^wow your a genius
An how many thousand watts did it gulp down?
Are landfills large enough to accept all the stuff people will discard as they try and buy new and newer stuff?
how much?
That is a HUGE tv. Where would it go?
thats some BIG TV!!!!!!! lol
i hate it because once u think u got the top of the line model, they come out with one 10 times better!
How much does it cost? 1 kidney or 2?
Uh, it's okay. Lol. That's HUGE!!!
Uh, it's okay. Lol. That's HUGE!!!
The ultimate TV for all those guys out there needing to compensate for something! :-)
thanks huffy, well said...
I'm in love. If you have a spare one I will give it a good home. Heck I'll knock down a wall to get it into my house :)
im going to buy that now
What a beast!!! I think a house would need to be built around this monstrosity, how else would you get it in? I'll stick with my 11 year old 27" tube tv for now :P
I want one :)
holy moly!!! how much is that monsterious gadget????
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
66 Posted by efrenbautistajr on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:52PM EDT Report Abuse
Too expensive though..