Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:51PM EST
See Comments (8)
Acer's Ferrari laptop line has long offered a good blend of performance and exceptionally nice looks. With carbon fiber shells, tasteful accents, and smoothly rounded corners, the machines aren't just for car enthusiasts. They perform well and they look good in just about any environment.
Acer's latest takes the Ferrari further into the ultraportable world, upgrading its Ferrari 1000 with a brighter, 12.1-inch screen that weighs in at 4.4 pounds. 4GB of RAM and a huge 250GB hard drive are now under the hood, giving the 1100 some of the beefiest specs in the ultraportable world today. A slot-loading DVD burner is icing on the cake.
All that is great... but under benchmarking fire, the 1100 was a tiny bit of a letdown. I got surprisingly good results on general business application tests (though nothing all that out of the ordinary), but gaming performance, usually a hallmark of the Ferrari line, was disappointing. In my Quake 4 test I got just 32.6 frames per second. That's just barely passable for gaming, but awfully low for a machine with discrete graphics, in this case an ATI Radeon X1270. Considering I can get close to 20 frames per second on some machines with Intel's cheap integrated graphics, I'd hoped for better gaming ability out of the unit. That said, compared to other machines in the sub-five-pound space, the 1100 is on top of them all, as none I've seen can even hit 30 fps.
At $1,999, the 1100 isn't cheap, but the Ferrari line never has been high on affordability. Most of the specs justify the cost, but with just a tiny graphics upgrade the 1100 would be a flat-out winner.
LINK: Acer Ferrari 1100
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
But it has a Ferrari sticker on it!
How many gamers want a 12" screen? To appreciate a good game, you usually go for 15" or better, widescreen. Down at 12" you are more interested in playing the occasional DVD- on a plane. Which makes one factor highlt inmporatant, but not mentioned in your article: How long will the battery last ?
Sorry: Battery life is just about 2 hours... not that impressive.
Nothing screams at me "I gotta have it" here in this review, although your article was interesting. I simply do not see the cost justifying your somewhat mixed review. I'd rather pay $400 less and get a loaded HP dv6500t with similar mixed benchmarks, but good overall performance outside of gaming. If I really wanted to go the ultra-portable cool route, I'd jump on the paper-thin Apple Air, even with it's obvious compromises.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by classyscmale on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:26PM EDT Report Abuse
Why bother reviewing this Chris? How many people want a 12" sceen with mediocre performance for $1100? I'd rather see reviews of notebooks in the $500-$600 range. I think this is where all the action will be for 2008.