Fri Jan 25, 2008 5:40PM EST
See Comments (10)
One year on, how is Vista's vaunted security, often touted by Microsoft as the main reason people should upgrade from XP, holding up? Surprisingly well, in fact. According to security researcher Jeff Jones, Vista remains an exceptionally secure OS, with about half the number of vulnerabilities in year one as XP over the same relative time frame.
I wrote about Jones' research previously, when he made the same analysis at Vista's six month birthday.
According to Jones (who works for Microsoft, by the way, though I still trust his overall findings), the picture today is pretty much the same as it was when last we checked in. I don't worry much about his comparisons to non-Windows OSes (all of which are totally insecure if you look at his numbers), but remain intrigued by how secure Vista seems to be. While booting up a new Vista computer still means downloading about 30 patches, that's nothing compared to the hundreds that XP requires.
That said, Vista is still young and will increasingly be targeted by hackers as it increases its market share. (XP still has a 76.9% market share compared to Vista's 10.5%.) As that number grows (and it inexorably will), its security exploits will likely get worse. But for now, well, at least there's something good going on with the OS.
Enjoy the full report here [PDF link].Â
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
That's interesting news but oh so much so. I agree with the reasons why Vista isn't target to many viruses; the market share is still small. Also, it works differently (programming code-wise) than XP does. Regarding Apple and Linux machines, again there's the thing about market share. Also, it's not exactly practical to attack a Linux machine. Or that's what I believe.
I have had Vista home premium sence March and have never had any problems with it. Everything i have ever loaded onto it works as expected. I have not seen what everyone said was so bad with Vista.
zmon400, are you trying to pick a fight? Comments like, "Nobody will EVER convince Apple/Mac users that anything else is any good at all, so I just tend to ignore all of their comments anyway." Are nothing but inflammatory. I use both a Mac and Windows. (GASP! Blasphemy cries both Windows and Mac zealots.) They both have their advantages and disadvantages. For the general home user who doesn't care about playing games, I have to say that my Mac is a much nicer machine to use. At work the Mac would be a laughable joke. As far as this article, I have never understood the logic behind quoting the number of discovered security leaks as any type of logic for a program being secure. Who cares about the number of discovered security issues which have been fixed? What we should be concerned with is the security issues which have not been fixed and the ones yet to be found. Unfortunately, there isn't really a metric to make a nice graphic of to show that your product is better then the others. Unfortunately, many companies are not known for being bothered by little facts like relevance and reality.
I have Vista. I hate it. Extremely slow transfer times over my home network. Bugs in the built in zip file extractor. Uses way too much RAM to run the operating system, etc, etc. I need to find a way to install OS X Leopard on my PC laptop
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 Posted by angad103 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:54PM EDT Report Abuse
r there any solutions for turbo c++ not running in vista ........................if yes reply urgently