Thu Jun 15, 2006 8:19PM EDT
See Comments (57)
A number of readers have piped up recently asking what exactly to make of the high-definition DVD hubbub. Blu-ray and HD-DVD... what are they? How are they different? And should you invest in these technologies? Here's everything you need to know in a language you can understand.
What is High-Definition DVD? High-definition DVD is a generic term for the next generation of DVD technology, which can burn more information onto the same size disc as your current CDs and DVDs. Like a DVD, it can be used for either video or computer data. But you'll need new hardware to play a hi-def disc on either your TV or your PC.
Why should you care? Because the quality of a hi-def DVD movie greatly outpaces that of a standard DVD, displaying images in real HDTV resolution. Users report that the picture is stunning, though the quality increase may be lost on those who aren't videophiles.
Similarly, the ability to put more data on a single optical disc is good for computer users. Backups can be burned to fewer discs, requiring fewer disc swaps and generally being less of a headache to use. However, since DVD is only now becoming popular for program distribution, hi-def probably has a decade or more to go before finding a use for commercial software.
There are two competing formats of hi-def DVD: Blu-ray and HD-DVD. Much like VHS and BetaMax, they are incompatible, and eventually only one standard is likely to "win," although both should theoretically output video at the same quality and resolution. The jury's out on which will be the victor: Momentum swings from one side to the other every couple of months. Some observers feel that neither may end up winning: That hi-def DVD may soon go the way of laserdisc. Only time will tell.
Meanwhile, here's what you need to know about the two competing formats.
Blu-ray. Note that it's not written "Blu-Ray" Blu-ray was pioneered by Sony and has support from Panasonic, Pioneer, Philips, Sharp, Apple, and other big vendors. A basic Blu-ray disc holds 25GB of data (vs. 4.7GB on a single-layer DVD). A dual-layer disc could hold 50GB, but some reports have noted that multi-layer Blu-ray discs have not yet been mastered. Still, it seems that 50GB Blu-ray discs are likely to arrive sometime.
Now the bad news: Blu-ray is still a ways off. While a Blu-ray drive for the PC is now available, the first players (for movie usage) won't arrive until June at the earliest. What's more, these players will cost $1,000 and up, which may be cost prohibitive. Sony's player is currently on pre-order for August delivery. The long-awaited PlayStation 3 (arriving in November) will also play Blu-ray discs, and many suspect that it will double as a movie player for many users.
Since Blu-ray drives haven't arrived yet, there are no real reviews or opinions to be found on them. How will it compare to DVD and HD-DVD? No one really knows.
HD-DVD. Toshiba is the big gun behind HD-DVD, and it has already released the first HD-DVD player on the American market. At just $500, the Toshiba HD-A1 is already half the price of a Blu-ray player, however early reviews have not been overly kind. Still, this is first generation technology-ugly, bulky, and slow-and many hope that a sleek and speedy $200 HD-DVD player could arrive within a year.
HD-DVD is a somewhat less capacious format: 15GB per layer, though Toshiba has claimed it can put three layers on a disc, for a theoretical total of 45GB. Fewer big companies are supporting HD-DVD, with names like Hitachi, NEC, and Sanyo supporting the format, far fewer than have signed on for Blu-ray. On the other hand, a handful of HD-DVD movies are already available for sale. Microsoft is also backing HD-DVD and has said it will release an HD-DVD add-on for the Xbox 360 later this year.
What to expect. The Christmas season will be high-definition's big test. Will the expensive PS3 be a hit? Will consumers care about higher-resolution movies? Will the muscle of Sony outclass its scrappier competition, even though it was first on the scene? No one knows the answers yet, and for my part, I'm waiting at least until 2007 to make a decision. It's possible that multi-format players may become available, too. Or both of them could disappear, leaving you with a pricey piece of junk. Ultimately the power lies with you, the consumer, to decide who "wins" this war.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
Ya, I would just like to add this is very helpful, I am a college student on a limited budget and I am going to build a high end computer for next semester once I get my next college refund check after buying books and whatnot, but that I wanted to get both HD and Blu-Ray drives,,,one of each, but knowing the prices lately it would seem hardley worth while...and especially the prices for RW Drives,,,,thanks Yahoo....
There are actually some Blu-ray players out there. The is even a sony notebook computer with a Blu-ray drive. Also there is also a Blu-ray drive out there for computers available now. Its expensive now, but costs should sharply drop soon. Blu-ray is better than HD-DVD for many reasons more storage (50 GB) higher transfer and burning speeds 1080P resolution (1920 x 1080) (HD DVD resolution is only 1280 x 768) Also the PLAYSTATION 3 has a built in Blu-ray drive ($500). An HD DVD player is also about $500 The XBOX doesn't have a built in HD-DVD drive. One is available for $199. So the price for an Xbox ($299+199) =($500) same price for Play station 3 The price for an Blu-ray player is expensive right now ($999) but I suggest if you want one, buy a Playstation 3.
for the people who can't find one....wait two months go to wal-mart get a PS3 and a HDTV if you don't already have one, then post based on real experience not just here say/there say from uninformed people on the internet.
By the way you are wrong, HD and BD will be able to show, up to 1080p It is all the video quality, and the tv you are playing. sd movies that are upconverted obviously will not look like a movie that is shot in 1080p "Posted by rbaker6 on Wed Jun 14, 2006 12:56PM EDT Report Abuse The reviewer states that both formats have the same resolution. This is NOT true. Toshiba's HD DVD can be shown in 720p or 1080i. 720 or 1080 refers to the number of vertical pixels. 1080i or interlace means every other line shows the next frame (I'm not sure of an easier way to explain this). The 720p or progressive means that the entire frame is updated each time. I think most people prefer progressive over interlace if the resolutions are the same time, which is why pretty much every standard definition DVD player has a progressive mode. Blu-Ray will be able to play in 1080p which is a higher resolution than Toshiba's HD DVD format of only 720p. I have a Toshiba HD DVD player. I have watched several HD DVD movies and feel that the 1080i mode is sharper than the 720p. I am very surprised that the jump in quality from standard defintion to high definition DVD's is not as great as I was expecting. I think that Sony's Blu-Ray 1080p mode will be another incremental improvement in image quality. The highest resolutions are not the same between the two formats. "
No one will win this race unless AND until ONE format is decided upon. Both companies (& backers) are fools if they believe otherwise. While they are 2, there will be none; with one, money to be made for all--DECIDE & pick one! Just split the profits--you'll make wayyyy more money (and sooner) than waiting out the fight. And needless to say, the best format does NOT always win! (see Beta vs VHS...) Let's hope WE win this time...(and probably with Blu-ray)
The reason why Sony's PS3 is dramatically cheaper than the Blu-Ray player: PS3 will only be able to show Blu-Ray discs in 1080p. When you insert a normal DVD, it will show in the normal 480 format. Blu-Ray player: will show a Blu-Ray disc in 1080P, AND WILL ALSO UPCONVERT A NORMAL DVD TO 1080P!!! So put it like this: Every DVD you own in your entire house, will automatically be upconverted to 1080P HD as long as you are using the Blu-Ray player scheduled to be realeased in the summer. That is an awesome feature. The PS3 also plays in 1080P, but the disc has to already be a 1080P. The upconversion is what you are paying for, when comparing the blu-ray player to the PS3. The HD-DVD player will not be able to upconvert, that is why it is cheaper. If you ask me, the upconversion is definitely worth the money, ESPECIALLY if you have a large DVD collection
Blu-ray is out now and it's absolutely breathtaking. Prices are dropping as well. A Samsung Blu-ray player is being sold at a local DC store for $749. I'm getting one. Blu-ray is to HD what HD is to regular tv. More beautiful than what you can see in a movie theater. Never seen the other.
Resolutions beyond a stage, makes no meaning to a regular customer, so long as he gets a sharp and clean vision and that is affordable last but not least can play all DVD formats. Customer-- The true winner takes it all thirucherairamesh@yahoo.com
Do you mean the "Stunning Digital Cable or Hi def " that streaks if the camera pans too fast. 30 years and its still TV! Hi def /digital /iphone - its still freaking TV! - and its still mostly crap! geez
again YOU GET WHAT YOU PAID FOR. There's usually a reason why HD-DVD is cheaper than Blue-Ray. You can see why here in this article. When you shop for a next gen player or ps3 or 360. think about will you be satisfied 1-2 years from the point of purchase. Note Blue-ray is the only one that can go 1080p. I think that where i want to be able to do 1-2 years from now.
do you need to buy a HD LCD Monitor to be able to play blue ray DVD's?
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
46 Posted by metalman473 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:16PM EDT Report Abuse
dont be fooled. I find that a lcd flat screen and standard dvd player is about as good as you need. bluray hd dvd their quality isnt that great. dont waste thousands of dollars on things you already possess