Wed Nov 8, 2006 12:49PM EST
See Comments (2)
Reader Giovanny Mendoza writes: I'm looking for a cell phone with a good camera. Can you suggest one? What's more important, resolution (megapixels) or zoom?
First off, understand that the vast majority of the cameras on cell phones are awful, and that a slim majority are barely passable. Fortunately, most new handsets now have 1.3-megapixel cameras in them instead of the 0.3-megapixel cams that were common as recently as 2005, so more phones are moving into the barely passable category. Still, choosing a phone based on the quality of its camera will likely be an exercise in frustration. With few exceptions (which I'm getting to), know that most cell phone cameras are pretty much the same.
To answer your latter question, megapixels are more important on a cell phone camera. Why? Virtually no camera phones sold in the U.S. have optical zoom at all (some overseas models do). What you might be hearing about is digital zoom, which isn't zoom at all but rather a method for cropping and enlarging a picture while it's still in the camera. Digital zoom doesn't make a photo any closer at all, and most users disable digital zoom because it can actually decrease the quality of the resulting images.
Now let's get down to your real question. If you don't want to carry a separate camera (which will give you much better results), I have one phone on the top of my list for you: The Samsung SCH-a990 (pictured), which has the best camera of any U.S.-marketed cell phone, featuring a whopping 3.2-megapixel camera and a design that actually makes it easy to take pictures with it. (The phone has a screen that flips around and covers up the numeric keypad, making the phone look and feel just like a standalone digicam.) Per the previous paragraph, though, even the a990 doesn't have optical zoom. However, I've used the a990 extensively and can vouch for its impressive abilities. You won't find a better cameraphone on our shores today.
If the a990 isn't up your alley, pick your phone based on the phone's other features first. As long as it has a 1.3-megapixel camera in it, the picture quality will be about as good as any other cameraphone. Either that, or move to Japan. They've had great cameraphones with optical zoom for years.
Previously on Yahoo! Tech: Cameraphone Photo School
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
Hey I just got the new Sony Ericson Walkman/Phone. Its got an amazing cammera you might want to try it, it stunned me.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by arissh on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:57PM EDT Report Abuse
The points made here seem extremely narrow in covering the abundant possibilities that exist in cell-phone photography. Let me add a little from my understanding. 1. If you want to substitute your regular Digi-cam for a cell phone cam, its still not quite possible - you must wait for Nokia N95 with its 5.1 Mega pixel resolution and 3X optical zoom. TRUE. 2. For taking more than decent pictures, Try something with a 2 MP. The best within 2 MP (Mega Pixel) camera phones are Sony Ericsson D750/K750/W800/W810 lot. It also has autofocus capabilities as well as an impressive twin LED-flash (i must tell you, it works much better as a flashlight in the dark then a camera flash. Nokia N70 (all N series 2 MP performs almost the same), 6280, 3250 are just a lil behind, so is samsung D600 (useful video option thought) and MotoRazr V3X/KRZR/RIZR. Nevertheless, all these highly popular camera phones will give you a decent picture in optimum environment (especially in the daylight). The 1.3 MP options can no longer be considered suitable. If you print them, you may not be very satisfied. Its partially the increase in MP and the other part in technology. 3. Now for the solution that meets both the worlds. Nokia N93 - or Sony Ericsoon K800/790 (samsung option has already been mentioned in the main article). They are both true performers. a 3.2 MP gives you something to forget the need of your Digicam. For most purposes - and when its a lot of bright light, you can get away with there camera phones. Good enough to fool even the pro eyes. Its a pity our MOTO is nowhere there. All the information I provide has been collected acquired from my experience and use/reading of articles on these phones. I do not confirm accuracy of any of these information and accept them as debatable. However, my need and interest has brought me to this understanding and I share it with my yahoo friends. If you want to know something more, mail me at arissh@yahoo.com