Tue Feb 19, 2008 10:31PM EST
See Comments (5)
Reader Bob writes: Every time I use my microwave my wireless connection is interrupted. Why does this happen? Is it dangerous?
Microwave ovens and Wi-Fi hardware both emit signals in the same general vicinity of 2.4GHz. In the case of Wi-Fi, it uses those signals to transmit data. In the case of a microwave, it uses those same waves to cook food. Ideally, those waves should be contained entirely within the microwave oven, but invariably some seep out, because microwaves emit those waves at such an incredibly high power. The result: Even though the leak level is very small, it's enough to garble sensitive network equipment, and wireless networks get confused by the extra (gibberish) traffic on the 2.4GHz band. The result is that they either slow down or drop your signal altogether.
There's a lot you can do to help things here. The simplest is to simply separate the microwave from your network by sheer distance. The further the two are apart from one another, the less interference there will be, though that interference does extend a lot farther than you'd think (at least 30 feet and even further in many cases). Of course, this interference will only occur when the microwave is actually running, so if this is just an interruption while you're making popcorn, maybe it's something you'll find you can live with.
The only other solution aside from distance is to upgrade your equipment. Newer microwave ovens leak less radiation, while newer Wi-Fi gear (802.11n, particularly), can better handle that interference. I can use my laptop on the kitchen counter and nuke some Hot Pockets with no problem, for example, as both my microwave and Wi-Fi gear are relatively new.
If that still doesn't help, you can do one foolproof thing to eliminate microwave interference altogether: Switch to 802.11a Wi-Fi equipment. 802.11a is an old standard that works on the 5GHz band. It's considerably slower, but it isn't subject to interference issues like other Wi-Fi equipment is. (Note that microwaves aren't the only thing operating at 2.4GHz. Cordless phones, remote control toys, wireless speakers, and even baby monitors can be found clogging up this radio band.)
To your final question, is all of this dangerous? Well, people have been backing away slowly from their microwaves for years, afraid they're going to be "nuked" in the literal sense. But 2.4GHz radiation isn't anything like nuclear radiation; and no studies have found any serious medical effects from microwave radiation leakage. (And this is now a technology that's been in mass acceptance in the U.S. for 30 years.) Some studies have found some correlation between microwave exposure and conditions like cataracts, but we use microwaves in such small amounts and the radiation leakage is so incredibly small in human terms that experts say there's nothing to worry about. Think of it as what they used to say about sitting to close to the TV.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
Slower than 802.11n, that's what I meant. The equipment is also more expensive, I should add, too.
"I can use my laptop on the kitchen counter and nuke some Hot Pockets with no problem..." How do you do that? I can only nuke one Hot Pockets at a time with my laptop. :-)
ka7 - Linux!
Eh? More expensive? Almost everything out there has 802.11a/b/g in it for under $80... The 802.11n stuff is what is expensive at about $120 average per piece right now... Where do you live that 802.11n is in-expensive?
This is a music player first, phone second. The music functions are very good: you can transfer musi ...
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by tcligon2000 on Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:49AM EST Report Abuse
I dont know why you say 802.11a is considerably slower! It is 54mbs just like 802.11g. (Not as fast as N but with N and G mixes it will be just as fast) It does have shorter range but in most homes not too much difference. Since it is on a much less used frequency it actually works better for those in areas with high 802.11b,g, n use since that interference is not present on the 5 gig band. I think the real reason it isn't used as much is the cost and that 2.4 is just wider used. 802.11a has several benefits. More channels, less competition for those channels, less interference from cordless phones, microwaves, cordless cameras etc. If you use two channel 802.11a you can easily run 108mbs with very little problems.