Fri Feb 22, 2008 11:37AM EST
See Comments (12)
Bad news if you use BitDefender AV 10, Trend Micro Internet Security 2008, or Zone Alarm Security Suite 7.1: None of these will work under Windows Vista Service Pack 1.
The overall list of newly incompatible programs is actually pretty small and heavy on security applications. You can get the full list of apps that won't work with Vista SP1 at Microsoft's support page here.
I've never even heard of most of the other apps on the list (Fujitsu's Shock Sensor, part of its laptop add-on software, and the New York Times Reader software are the exceptions), so most people won't experience issues. The most common apps, the three mentioned in the first paragraph above, simply won't load after you install SP1, so there's no additional risk of your PC crashing or you losing data... but you might find yourself suddenly without virus protection, so be warned.
There's unfortunately nothing you can do about these program incompatibilities except to wait for the vendor to fix the problem or install an alternative solution. In most cases, I expect those fixes to be available within the next few weeks, hopefully before SP1 actually ships, but some may very well linger.
Also note that this list reflects only software that is newly incompatible with Vista. There are no up-to-date incompatibility lists available on the web (most date back to last summer or earlier), and Microsoft has never provided one itself. That's a long way of saying that if you have an app that doesn't work with Vista now, it isn't going to suddenly start working when SP1 arrives. (Try Compatibility Mode!)
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
And there you go, proof that the software vendors are more to blame than Microsoft for all the problems with Vista.
Run Linux, why worry about this stuff?
I'd be happy to run Linux or get a Mac- except that I would then run into even more incompatability problems. For example, I use Office 2003. How would I get my existing software to run on my existing equipment by running Linux? Is Apple giving away Macs? If not, then how am I supposed to get one without buying new equipment? Then, getting my existing, paid-for software to work as easily as it does now? Further, if OS X will run on Intel processors, why won't Apple let it run on *any* computer? I'd happily buy a copy if Apple didn't deliberately cripple it. Apple behaves in exactly the same way as Microsoft does- where's the antitrust investigations against Apple for artificially blocking the use of is operating systems on any computer? There's no valid reason to do so *except* that Apple gets a cut on hardware, so it cripples its software to only run on machines that Apple sells. Even Microsoft doesn't do that, but you sure don't hear it. In short, "run Linux" and "get a Mac" are comments by people who have nothing constructive to say. If Mac were better, it would run my existing software out of the box. Yes, you can run bootcamp, but why should I? I don't have to on my existing machine. Maybe Apple should stop crippling OS X and let it run on any machine. I've run Ubuntu and like it. It's use it more if it would run my existing software out of the box. It doesn't. Why is the solution to fixing Windows problems "run Linux" or "get a Mac"? How exactly will either of those solve the problem that was presented? It won't, you know it, so it was pointless to suggest joining your cults. You might consider making a useful comment in the future. What we *really* need to do is completely discard all of the current software and hardware architectures and start from scratch. That's not going to happen, either.
I love the Mac & PC commercials. Just shows how full of themselves mac users are. Don't forget, Leopard has its fair share of problems too.
Want a camera that knows how you feel? the Sony T70 can tell when you are saying "cheese."
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by shadowman_26 on Fri Feb 22, 2008 1:06PM EST Report Abuse
And yet, proof that the software vendors are more to blame for the imcompatible software they produce for Vista.