Medical equipment, including pacemakers, vulnerable to hackers

Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:00PM EDT

See Comments (10)

Here's a scary rarity: A computer security risk that could cost you your life. Researchers at the University of Massachusetts have found that medical equipment, including pacemakers and implanted cardiac defibrillators, can be hacked through wireless technology. In specific terms, the researchers were able to send commands to the devices without authorization, reprogram them, and even cause them to deliver a high-voltage shock on command.

Wireless technology is used by doctors to monitor a pacemaker or defibrillator, allowing it to be adjusted as needed. Hacks can interfere with this operation in two ways: By turning them off altogether, or by causing them to go into overdrive, possibly sending a powerful shock that could kill you. The wireless signal is not encrypted.

While the researchers are careful to note that no one has ever been the victim of a malicious attack like this (at least none that has been reported) and that the real danger here is minimal, the implications are profound for thousands of people who already have implanted devices like these, especially once the details of the exploit become common knowledge. These devices represent a rising trend, too, as doctors turn to similar equipment to treat even more conditions.

What to do about it? If you've got a wireless pacemaker, there's really nothing you can do. If it's a procedure you're considering, you'd obviously be foolish to bypass essential medical equipment because you're afraid a hacker might sneak up on you and turn it off while you're not looking, but it's certainly prudent to check with your doctor about what might be done to prevent malicious (and possibly accidental) attacks like this in the future, and whether your equipment could be updated to take advantage of any new security features.

Comments on Medical equipment, including pacemakers, vulnerable to hackers

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by afridi_6669 on Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:55PM EDT Report Abuse

    I think making this disclosure on the net may serve as a new thrill to those who love to hack. Therefore, this report should not have been public because lives of thousands of patients who depend on pacemakers would be at risk or atleast their life-saving machine would be vulnerable. Now, it is your responsibility to float some idea to the makers of pacemakers to reprogramme their gadgets to reduce the risk of hacking.

  • 2 Posted by mikeybbadd3 on Wed Mar 12, 2008 5:00PM EDT Report Abuse

    Yes, I agree with afridi_, to warn the medical profesion would have been nice and the right thing to do but now theres a new way to get a divorce.... :)

  • 3 Posted by cnull on Wed Mar 12, 2008 5:38PM EDT Report Abuse

    afridi - If the disclosure had NOT been made and someone had actually been killed by a pacemaker hacker, people (probably you) would be screaming at the top of their lungs that the public should have been notified. Knowledge is power. Not just for evil but for good solutions, too.

  • 4 Posted by rick_brisco on Wed Mar 12, 2008 6:46PM EDT Report Abuse

    an ounce of prevention is worth a pount of cure

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment

 

Sign In to see your profile information, saved products and more...

Register Sign In

My Favorite Gadgets

 

Recent Activity

 

Recently Viewed

on | off on | off
 

Recent Searches

on | off on | off
 
 
 

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.