British regulators OK cell phones in planes

Fri Apr 4, 2008 11:28AM EDT

See Comments (81)

One of the final hurdles preventing Europeans from chit-chatting on their cell phones while hurtling through Euro airspace has been cleared, as UK regulator Ofcom (akin to our FCC), has given the OK for cell phones to be used on planes, as long as they're above 3,000 meters. (Many of the other approvals required across Europe have already been granted.)

While the idea of airborne cell phone usage has been a public disaster in the U.S., Europeans seem somewhat warmer to the notion. Perhaps it's the generally shorter flights that tend to dominate Europe, or perhaps it's cultural: Cramped, loud buses and subways tend to be the norm, so the additional noise of a few people on their phones may tend to bother Europeans less than it does their privacy-and-silence-obsessed American counterparts.

Just because Ofcom has signed off, though, that doesn't mean that cell phones will immediately start being whipped out as soon as that 10,000-foot bell chimes en route to Grenoble. It's up to individual airlines now to decide whether they want to offer cell phone in-flight services, and then they have to install the equipment on their planes to make it work. Europe's Aviation Safety Agency also has to approve any new equipment installed on planes (though this is not seen as a major obstacle; all new electronics devices installed on jets have to be approved in this manner). It's also worth noting that no airline has formally applied for permission to offer such services yet, though this is probably just a matter of time.

Of course, in the U.S., no such plans are underway, though those hopeful for getting Internet access while airborne are in for a treat. This week, the FAA approved plans for American Airlines to offer in-flight Wi-Fi service, and that approval can potentially be applied to any U.S. airline that wants to offer the same type of technology (provided by Aircell). No news on a date when such services will be turned on, but many are hoping to have live Wi-Fi rolled out on at least a few planes by the end of the year.

UPDATE: The EU has OK'd the plan, too

Previously: The Refrain in Spain is Mainly on the Plane
Europe Closer to Allowing Cell Phones on Planes

Comments on British regulators OK cell phones in planes

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 66 Posted by parismonsoon on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:59PM EDT Report Abuse

    Doesn't this make anyone wonder about the famous cell phone usage on flight 93 on 9/11? Was and is personal cell-phone usage impossible in-flight, without special equipment installed by the airline? According to this article, no plans to do so are underway in the US, does this make sense? I admittedly am confused!

  • 67 Posted by ernin2000 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:56PM EDT Report Abuse

    The science behind the "Mythbusters" episode was flawed. It was entertaining, but flawed nonetheless. The real problem of interference with the instruments comes from getting batteries too close to the magnetic compass. Now then, I object to being cooped up in what will essentially be a microwave oven for long periods.

  • 68 Posted by isabella1880 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:25PM EDT Report Abuse

    To Leonheart, bless you and the youngsters like you, but remember you are a juicy apple amongst the rot. Most people (especially here in the UK) care only for themselves and their needs when it comes to their mobile phone conversations and since it is not YOUR country that has passed the laws (Kudos to the yanks I say!) but our government (another law passed to appease the chav culture - see 'elesadako's post above) it is not YOU and your kind I am worried about, it is the kind of person who would think nothing of talking through a flight just because they can.

  • 69 Posted by emiliaherzberg on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:54PM EDT Report Abuse

    we (us) americans) should be able to figure out things like this before other countries. it looks bad in our part

  • 70 Posted by emiliaherzberg on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:54PM EDT Report Abuse

    we (us) americans) should be able to figure out things like this before other countries. it looks bad in our part

  • 71 Posted by emiliaherzberg on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:54PM EDT Report Abuse

    we (us) americans) should be able to figure out things like this before other countries. it looks bad in our part

  • 72 Posted by emiliaherzberg on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:54PM EDT Report Abuse

    we (us) americans) should be able to figure out things like this before other countries. it looks bad in our part

  • 73 Posted by joanna_voyageuse on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:37PM EDT Report Abuse

    I for one am really excited about the new move, although I can understand that using the phone to call people would be really irritating to other passengers, especially if they were trying to sleep, for example. If used for texting or emailing only, I think this will be really handy for those like me who travel a lot for work and could really use those precious moments previously lost in an aircraft, to contact the office. I've got a HTC Touch Diamond ( http://www.mypocketpcmobile.com/FullReviewHTCTouchDiamond/tabid/247/Default.aspx ) and unfortunately am your average smartphone addict, always checking my emails! Anyway, time will tell if in the future I miss those quiet, phone-free flights eh...! Andy

  • 74 Posted by tevansphoto on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:01PM EDT Report Abuse

    "Cramped, loud buses and subways tend to be the norm, so the additional noise of a few people on their phones may tend to bother Europeans less than it does their privacy-and-silence-obsessed American counterparts." Dumb comment of the day.

  • 75 Posted by davidraynor2 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:38PM EDT Report Abuse

    Must agree with Isabella they are a pain in the rear.We won't be able to escape the noisey mobile chatters. Its a bad day for flyers.

  • 76 Posted by jrgnc1 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:42PM EDT Report Abuse

    Of course we'd have to use the airline's cell phone service. Why is it that we couldn't use our own? More revenue for the airline? And why couldn't we use our own ISP on our laptop?

  • 77 Posted by painispast on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:48PM EDT Report Abuse

    In the future cell users will be treated as smokers are now :)

  • 78 Posted by getubig on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:08PM EDT Report Abuse

    I think it is a bad idea. The Chatty Kathys (posted by redfistaor) are so self-absorbed they have no regard for their peers flight experience. I like the idea of the Internet but again I don't put a lot of faith in good judgement from people. We've got problems with people masturbating on planes, how are they going to control Internet content. I can just see some grandma sitting next to Joe Blow and he pulls up the porn site with audio.

  • 79 Posted by isabella1880 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:25PM EDT Report Abuse

    Let's just answer 'Elesadako' questions shall we? have u never come across babies crying, Yes, numerous times, on many forms of public transport. I also know (from experience) that no matter how much it irritates me, it drives the mother of that baby even more crazy. Thankfully, flight attendants seem to do their utmost to try and calm a loud baby for the sake of all the other passengers. At the end of the day, a baby cannot help itself, an adult with a mobile should have better self control. a bunch of playful kids running up and down the isle, No, because it is not allowed, any airline letting children run up and down the aisle would get a sound earbashing regarding safety. Having flown with an hyper-active 3 year old before, who spent a 10 hour flight sleeping and watching cartoons, all I can say on the matter is 'What the heck are the parents doing'? or simply just a couple of normal people having a conversation They should keep their noise down at quiet times, no one wants to hear their conversation any more than we want to hear the conversation of a mobile user. Who is being more selfish? The person who keeps their child occupied and quiet for the sake of the other passengers? The person who plans their time well and brings lots of mags and books? The person who has a low quiet conversation with their friends/family so as not to wake up sleeping passengers? Or the person honking away on a mobile for hours on end with no regard to others? I repeat, there is NO reason why anyone would need to have a mobile conversation in the air, even emergencies can wait and if they can't wait (OMG! Someone is sick/dead) you can't do anything until you land anyway. This stupid law is the height of folly.

  • 80 Posted by jimmychook on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:35PM EDT Report Abuse

    Oh wow, now I can hear all the chatting on the mobile on a two hour flight. That would kill me if I need some sleep. The British Regulators must be so inconsiderate. Go encourage the use of the mobile somewhere else, not in the plane? What if the guy next to me talk incessantly and throw all the bedroom secret out? I dont want to hear those things? Please reverse this change of rule for everybody's sake.

  • 81 Posted by majikhours on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:04PM EDT Report Abuse

    It is interesting that special equipment needs to be installed on a plane to make cell phones useful, but that during 911 in the States there are numerous recorded "conversations" from planes. Makes one wonder doesn't it.

More Posts: First Prev 3 4 5 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.