WiMAX slapfight gets underway

Thu Apr 17, 2008 11:42AM EDT

See Comments (4)

It's funny: While Apple is wrangling with trying to decide when it's going to release a 3G cell phone, the rest of the mobile industry is working on getting 4G (the most promising type of which is WiMAX) ready for prime time. In many circles, 3G is already getting to be a bit dated, with not quite enough bandwidth for high-def TV broadcasting or full-speed mobile-to-mobile videoconferencing, some of the industry's most anticipated upcoming mobile features. The solution: Another giant leap forward to the realm of double-digit throughput.

But WiMAX has had more than its share of problems since it was originally described in 2001. Now, things have come to a head, with one Australian WiMAX company calling the technology a "miserable failure" and abandoning its WiMAX investment altogether. WiMAX has been touted as potentially offering speeds of 70Mbps over a range of several miles, but Australia's Buzz Broadband says that wasn't the case, claiming that its experience saw signal dropouts in less than 1 1/2 miles if there was any obstruction between base station and user, with latencies of up to a full second, making it wholly useless for voice communications.

The rest of the industry has responded in defiance, saying that Buzz's experiences are not surprising given the newness of the technology and that the kinks will get worked out. Ars Technica quotes an Accenture executive as noting that even venerable CDMA had problems when it was first rolled out in Korea, but now it's working without issue.

Still, early American WiMAX tests, while they have worked well enough, haven't shown speeds much faster than those that current 3G networks offer. Is that because Sprint's Xohm, as America's biggest WiMAX project is known, is still in beta, or because we're facing some real limits as to what the technology will do? Time will tell.

Comments on WiMAX slapfight gets underway

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by rogueist on Thu Apr 17, 2008 1:19PM EDT Report Abuse

    Interesting information... this could very well explain why its taking so long to implement WiMAX in the US - and maybe a hint at a lot of fraud going on in many companies claiming to have the WiMAX solution.

  • 2 Posted by agustin2489 on Fri Apr 18, 2008 12:34AM EDT Report Abuse

    Like in the HD war, I'm going to be on the sidelines waiting for something that's clearly good. It's too early to tell.

  • 3 Posted by james_e_gentry_iv on Fri Apr 18, 2008 5:52PM EDT Report Abuse

    "the rest of the mobile industry is working on getting 4G (the most promising type of which is WiMAX) ready for prime time..." Your way off Chris Noll..!! Call me pessimistic, but I enjoy proving you wrong. :-) WiMAX has it's limits. (1) LTE will roll out in 2010 before WiMAX, I guarantee (2) LTE is almost twice as fast as WiMAX. (3) Requires 8 times the sites as LTE (4) LTE user rates will be lower (5) WiMAX is already at EOL before it even rolls out. (6) Shall I go on? Sprint can't even get funds from investors to roll out it's WiMAX Xohm because they know this! However, their is one thing that is good with WiMAX, it's backwards compatibility with LTE. :) Lets go 4G!!

  • 4 Posted by cryinglawyer on Wed Apr 23, 2008 7:08AM EDT Report Abuse

    All though the tech on WiMax hasn't been throughly been inspected, the idea behind WiMax is limited.

More Posts: First Prev 1 Next Last

Post a Comment

 

Sign In to see your profile information, saved products and more...

Register Sign In

My Favorite Gadgets

 

Recent Activity

 

Recently Viewed

on | off on | off
 

Recent Searches

on | off on | off
 
 
 

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.