Should you pay more for name-brand RAM?

Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:32PM EDT

See Comments (12)

Reader Joe writes: I'm going to upgrade my notebook from 2GB to 4GB of RAM. I know all the specs and how to perform the easy physical installation. Question: Is there a difference in performance/quality among the brands, or is one best off going for the least expensive?

RAM, like most computer components, has some commodity aspects to it, but all RAM sticks are not created equal.

I have not done in-depth, head-to-head tests myself, but I've seen independent testing that has shown some real, though far from huge, differences among RAM brands (or at least sub-brands within a single parent brand) when it comes to performance. Perhaps the most reliable intel is this feature from Maximum PC (PDF link, and a good 4MB at that; turn to page 38), which tested Crucial's standard-grade RAM against its specialty products, a "high clock speed" RAM and a "low latency" RAM. In both cases, the specialty RAM powered the PC to better benchmark scores than the standard RAM, virtually across the board. Though the high clock speed RAM beat the low latency RAM on most of the benchmarks, the results were close enough that the magazine recommended the low latency RAM. Bottom line: RAM matters.

The other issue, and probably a bigger one, is reliability. I haven't seen any large-scale studies to back it up, but empirical evidence indicates that generic RAM may fail more often or have bum components more frequently than its name-brand counterparts. Let me put it another way: The only RAM units I've personally see fail have been generic or off-brand ones. I've never encountered trouble with any of the brands I recommend (see below), even after years of service.

So to answer your specific question: If you're upgrading to 4GB of RAM it sounds like you're doing some real work beyond, say, typing memos, and you probably require rock-solid stability on your machine. How much is the potential for better stability worth to you? 2GB of absolute-rock-bottom generic laptop RAM will run you $36. From a quality vendor? About $46. If your generic RAM causes just two crashes a year... what's that worth? I'd happily pay the extra 10 bucks for the name brand, especially considering you can generally get your money back if it's dead on arrival or if you bought the wrong product.

As for brands, I can recommend three: Crucial, Corsair, and Kingston. Other brands are probably fine, but I've had the most experience with this trio and, like I've said, none have ever failed me. (Also, don't miss the Crucial.com website, which has a killer "Memory Advisor" tool to identify exactly the type of RAM you should buy for your computer.)

Comments on Should you pay more for name-brand RAM?

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by agustin2489 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:47PM EDT Report Abuse

    I remember using Crucial's memory adviser to look up extra memory for an ASUS Eee. I was surprised when it found the correct memory. Overall, I find Kingston memory to be my favorite memory.

  • 2 Posted by classyscmale on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:26PM EDT Report Abuse

    I don't disagree that two of these three brands are very good quality. We purchase lots and lots of RAM and find "in general" you get what you pay for. We only buy and sell "majors" and offer a lifetime warrantee on all of our memory. That is probably the best suggestion - look at the warrantee.

  • 3 Posted by rogueist on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    Wow prices for laptop ram has fallen thru the floor. Last time I bought 2Gb of laptop ram it cost me almost $200 for 2x1Gb Crucial memory... But that being said, I had some reliability issues when I first installed it, but the reliability issues got fixed with upgrades to Windows - so the issues were Windows issues and NOT ram issues. A good portion of RAM problems are OS problems and not the RAM itself, or at least that is what I have found over the years. Anyways I am a fan of both Crucial and Kingston for laptop memory, but for PCs I will buy any brand, including generics. PCs are a little more forgiving to the memory than laptops are.

  • 4 Posted by uffpet on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:27PM EDT Report Abuse

    I never bought anything else but Crucial so I cannot comment on the other brands but I have had absolutely no issues with Crucial, and Chris is right - their Memory Advisor application rocks and takes the guesswork out of picking memory for your system...

  • 5 Posted by marcus_ironfist on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:06PM EDT Report Abuse

    I have been a Kingston user since the mid 1990's, and I have never had a failed stick. I have heard that the Crucial and Corsair brands are good, but I think Kingston always has the advantage of a better price for my wallet.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.