Face scans to start in UK airports

Mon Apr 28, 2008 5:34PM EDT

See Comments (6)

It's like something out of a sci-fi movie: This summer, UK airports (it's not clear precisely which ones) will begin using face scanning technology to verify that travelers are who they say they are.

The scanners will be used to automate some passport checks with the goal of easing congestion in security lines caused by slowpoke humans verifying identity through comparing passport photographs with the face standing before them.

Critics, however, are concerned that the technology will have the opposite effect, that face scanners are so unreliable that delays will actually be longer as travelers are sent to a human-checked line when the machines fail to recognize them. One opponent claims face recognition scanners have a pathetic 40 percent accuracy rate, but independent studies have shown that, under controlled conditions with good lighting, face recognition systems can at least approach the accuracy level of other biometric systems. Face recognition has the advantage that it doesn't require physical contact (as with a fingerprint or hand geometry scan), or ultra-detailed, close-up photography (as with an iris scan). 

Of course, one bad omen is already present: This isn't the UK's first attempt at bringing biometrics into airports. Iris scans used at three major UK airports were put on hold last November, and plans to take fingerprints in Heathrow were also scrapped last month when privacy advocates asked where the fingerprint data collected at the airport would end up.

But the UK loves to experiment with unproven technology. It'll be intriguing to see whether face recognition tech works out... and what that will mean for the thousands of people employed at airports whose job is to look at your ID, look at you, and then scrawl something on your boarding pass, grunting at you to continue along in the line.

Comments on Face scans to start in UK airports

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by scottiecordes on Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:05PM EDT Report Abuse

    Until the TSA employs people for an affordable wage, and demands professionalism (something 8-9 bucks an hour does not get you) security is doomed to fail. I don't care what kind of technology you have available.

  • 3 Posted by sat_ece on Wed Apr 30, 2008 7:45AM EDT Report Abuse

    even though this technology is useful.but this wont be helpful in sase of security purpose b'coz many persons look alike.

  • 4 Posted by tombpsyco on Thu May 1, 2008 8:38AM EDT Report Abuse

    Biometrics is a false sense of security! What about the percentage of people that are not recognized by facial scanning? Will they be labeled as something less than a legal traveler, or will they be detained every time they go through a airport? If you are detained who will be held accountable for the mistake of the machine that says you are not who you are? Come on people even at best biometrics is only 90% accurate. The TV show here in the U.S.A. , Myth Busters proved that thumb scanners can be bypassed with a photocopy of a thumb print. How well do you think face scans can be?

  • 5 Posted by riverwest2 on Sat May 3, 2008 11:06PM EDT Report Abuse

    They should use humans, and some common sense. I hope this doesn't catch on - they expect us to use the same passports for a long time. Age, hairstyle changes (wanted or not), different makeup, tiredness from jet lag - it's gonna add up.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.