Mon May 5, 2008 11:42AM EDT
See Comments (9)
Amazon.com fired the latest volley in the war against states (in this case, New York) who want to collect sales taxes for purchases made over the Internet and shipped across state lines. This week it's suing New York over a new law that says it and other e-tailers have to collect state sales taxes for sales made to NY residents, even though Amazon.com is based in Washington. New NY Governor David Paterson signed the rule into law last week.
Such a fight has been bubbling up for years. Last November, New York's then-Governor Eliot Spitzer first floated a plan to collect sales taxes on web-based purchases, but he quickly pulled the proposal. And technically speaking, many states (at least 20 of them, including New York) already require citizens to declare out of state purchases on their annual tax returns and voluntarily pay taxes on them. The problem is that no one does, so New York's new rule would put the onus on the merchant to collect the tax instead and send it on over to New York.
But that's against the law, says Amazon. 1992's ruling in Quill v. North Dakota held that one state can't impose collection requirements on an out-of-state corporation unless it has a substantial physical presence in that state. That's been the law of the land ever since, and why you'll find some web purchases taxed and some not. New York's argument here is bizarre, saying that thousands of Amazon affiliates (people who sell stuff through Amazon's third-party services or get commissions on sales there) are located in New York, and thus that amounts to a physical presence there. Oh, and NY wants all sales in the state taxed, not just those affiliate sales.
The fight is going to be a bitter one. Amazon is worried that it will lose New York customers if they have to pay tax, and the state is anxious to get its hands on what would raise about $50 million a year for no extra effort. Amazon.com says the law is specifically and prejudicially focused against the company, saying that New York even refers to the new rule as the "Amazon tax."
Whoever wins, there will be major repercussions, as there are dozens of other states lined up behind New York, all eager to get a piece of that sales tax action, too. Stay tuned for more news as this winds its way through the courts.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
New York taxes for everything why because we support everyone. I hate this state I am leaving they get enough refugees but they are on welfare. hey new york im leaving im sick of supporting you and your lazy welfare state.
I thought the people were supposed to have a say. No person voted on this. why do they think they have the right to tax everyone and everything then ----- when people leave the state!!! this state is a blood sucker.!!! I am going back to florida.
ever hear of the boston tea party...this is what they fought for. Why should my company pay ny taxes when we do not use the services that money will provide (being located in another state) and being a resident of another state i can not vote on any legistlation on taxes. Teveritt i'm sure if the government asked you would be willing to pay 90% of your income in taxes.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 Posted by teveritt on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:01PM EDT Report Abuse
crimson are you crazy? Why should amazon NOT collect and pay sales tax? It's NOT squeezing tax dollars out of someone and it certainly has nothing to do with Jewish people. I think it's high time all internet purchases are taxed. Your comment - It's why people crash planes into the sides of buildings? - is VERY distrurbed. Please check yourself into the closest mental institution or jail would be even better. You have no clue to even suggest such a thing.