Wed May 7, 2008 7:23PM EDT
See Comments (10)
New legislation which toughen penalties for software piracy (including music, movies, and computer programs) passed a big test in the House recently. The House of Representatives Judiciary Committee approved the new propsal known as the Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property (Pro-IP) Act, sending it to the floor of the House for debate and a vote. (That debate has already been underway this week.)
Pro-IP steps up penalties for piracy and is designed largely to fight large-scale counterfeiting operations. While the proposal has had one controversial new fine schedule removed from its text, other penalties have been increased, specifically calling for treble damages for counterfeiters and upgrading the rights of feds to seize property from violators convicted of IP infringement, though that property would have to be proven that it was "substantially connected" to the crime. Additional rules would appoint IP "attaches" to various embassies to aid the Justice Department in its prosecution of overseas infringers. The full Bill runs 68 pages if you'd like to check it out.
Naturally, concerns over the potential abuse of Pro-IP are rising, as observers worry that it could be applied liberally against people accused of small-scale copyright violation, as with the suits the RIAA has brought against individuals in the last few years. Since so few of those suits have resulted in guilty verdicts (only one that I'm aware of), the feeling from some is that stepping up penalties against infringers may be a bit premature.
Copyright owners are, of course, excited to see penalties increase, even though, with civil damages already set at up to $150,000 per song, they're through the roof as it is.
Up next: More debate in the House, then presumably a full vote. If it passes, it's on to the Senate.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
I hate listening to these bucketheads getting free stuff and then whining about how it shouldn't be illegal because they are selfish. I don't know why I even read their moron talk. I guess it's good that I don't check any message boards anymore. I knew these comments would be so full of crap. I guess I'm just in a rotten mood anyway, so I thought I'd enjoy the rage.
Like anything out there, moderation is course best for both sides. Anybody who hasn't purchased music in years, yet has thousands of MP3s should be slapped hard. Me? Hundreds upon hundreds of albums, 900+ CDs and counting. Been burgalurized and am now replacing those. I have paid my dues I believe, but worry that future plans of replicating my collection onto a 1tb hard drive might drive the RIAA upon my doorstep. Though with the way legislation is going, any kind of duplication is an easy way for the RIAA and anyone connected to make up for lost sales. Present day music is akin to what makes crops grow faster, manure. 150,000 for piece of crap is not exactly equating that the punishment fitting the crime. Parties on both sides are abusing the system. Long ago I'd heard recordings were promotional items left for radio stations to play, in order for concert goers to garner some interest in the artist. Slowly the art form changed, whereas now the single issuance of the recording is the money maker, not the concert or items associated with it. Technology raises it head, ugly to some and consumes the recording industries lifeline. Maybe it is time they tapped other sources of income, out of issue recordings not presently available, a bit more selectivity in their search for talent, and for the artist/recording industry to realize that a single recording is not a lottery win. It is a performance, not a retirement plan. Bytes move fast, so does money, time to move before time knocks you into yesterday.
how do you enforce civil matters without involving the goverment, do we all just pick up a weapon and enforce what ever we don't like we think is a civil matter and if somebody steals something of your of great value is that a civil matter, or is it ok to steal from some one you think is rich and has enough money.
to 9, I agree. I have spent 1000's on movies (Dvds and at the cinema) I think I have given them more than i should have. If they want piracy to stop, why don't they make media more affordable and lower movie prices. What is it now, 10 bucks to see a movie. Thats Crazy!! This is just a way for them to make money from those who are not willing, or cannot afford to keep up with their massive price increase. Do they really think this will change anything? People are still going to break copy right laws and people still won't pay any fines that are thrown at them. Ok, I understand Piracy is wrong and id advise anyone from doing it, but there are way more important things going on in this world than teenagers downloading songs and movies on his home computer. This country is always putting those corporate suits in front of the normal everyday American. Get a grip America!!
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 Posted by omgllamaattack on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:45PM EDT Report Abuse
To 6, learn to spell check. Also, there is a HUGE difference in potatoes (actual matter, you can't ctrl+c ctrl+v a potato). The planter would have to buy the stuff to make potatoes, to plant them, to harvest them. Therefore he should get paid for it. As for music and movies... copy&paste hurts no one. Musicians still get 20 dollars from many people for their cds, they sell t-shirts, posters, charge 100 dollars for concert tickets. Get paid thousands for tv appearances. The movie stars still get paid millions of dollars for a roll in a [usually] ----- ty movie. They still waste that money on 500,000 dollar cars, extremely over-priced clothes, "bling", cocaine, etc. As for programs, no, I'm not going to pay $500 for Adobe Photoshop just because I want to mess around with it and edit a few pictures.