RIAA employee outlines pirate-hunting tactics

Wed May 14, 2008 11:10AM EDT

See Comments (13)

Ever wonder how the RIAA decides who to sue when it comes to its tens of thousands of music-sharing lawsuits? The Chronicle of Higher Education has discussed the matter in depth with an RIAA employee, who remains anonymous in this story, to outline exactly how it hunts down the people it eventually sues.

Those of us who live down the rabbit hole of tech know most of these details already, but if you're a casual technology user and have ever used a peer-to-peer app, you'll probably find this fascinating. That said, it's also interesting to hear directly from the RIAA confirming what we, for the most part, already knew.

Here's the digested version of the process: The RIAA uses MediaSentry, an independent company, to search LimeWire for a list of songs the RIAA's members own. MediaSentry just goes down the list, and when it finds a match, the IP address of the file sharer is recorded. There's no word on whether newer songs get more attention, but that seems probable.

MediaSentry matches the IP address to the ISP that owns it, and then the subpoenas kick in: Once the RIAA is given an IP address and the name of the ISP, it can subpoena that ISP for the identity of the subscriber that was using the IP address at that particular time. Then the lawsuits and DMCA notices fly, especially with regard to universities, where the bulk of infringement is said to take place and where results (that is, music being taken offline) are often swift.

Some important points: The RIAA doesn't, and can't, track who's downloading music, only who's sharing it on their hard drive. Though reports have surfaced in recent months that the RIAA might be running its own "honey pot" servers designed to trap people looking for illegal music, and that it seeds P2P networks with fake versions of popular songs, these activities don't appear to be the focus of the group. Nor should they, really: It is considerably easier to just search P2P networks for contraband rather than running your own in the hopes that a pirate will wander by.

Another interesting point: LimeWire is the only P2P network mentioned by name in the story. While other services, including eDonkey and BitTorrent, offer just as much (or more) copyrighted material, it's interesting to see that LimeWire may be a focus. MediaSentry may indeed search these other networks for contraband, but it's curious that LimeWire seems to be the focus.

Comments on RIAA employee outlines pirate-hunting tactics

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 1 Posted by michael_swaney on Wed May 14, 2008 12:58PM EDT Report Abuse

    Screw the R.I.A.A. and MediaSentry. If I buy a song at walmart I own the liscense to that song and have a constitutional right to share it with my friends whether I physically hand them the disc or send the file through computer download to them. Oh wow I am a pirate. My sister has remote access to my files on my puter and I have all my wal-mart downloads there and she downloads the files to her computer. Come and get me RIAA and MediaSentry I dare you.

  • 2 Posted by jg76aries on Wed May 14, 2008 1:29PM EDT Report Abuse

    http://www.thepiratebay.org actually has a page that shows the legal documents (threats) they have recieved from RIAA and other companies such as Microsoft and many more. Since they are located in another country where U.S. laws (and certain international laws as well) do not apply, and BitTorrent files only contain tracking information, not the actual files themselves, Pirate Bay basically tells them to go screw themselves. Check it out, it's freakin' hilarious.

  • 3 Posted by jg76aries on Wed May 14, 2008 2:01PM EDT Report Abuse

    The RIAA really needs to face that fact that the medium has changed. Discs, though still a viable format today, are eventually going to go away. Personally I like having the full artwork and lyrics, but then there are some albums that I just want the music and I can burn my own disc. And sharing has gone back to the days of cassette tapes (maybe farther). Used to be I would copy off of a friends CD onto a tape (waaaaaay back in the late 80's to early 90's)since I was a broke teenager, but eventually I would buy the CD. It's only because digital formats are so easy to distribute that the RIAA is freaking out. By Suing people over it they're only going to create an atmosphere of fear and mistrust. I don't yet have a solution to offer the RIAA, but all these lawsuits aren't the answer. Even if they win, these people essentially would have to file for bankruptcy. That just isn't right.

  • 4 Posted by rogueist on Wed May 14, 2008 4:23PM EDT Report Abuse

    The RIAA actually actively engages in what the DHS calls "technological terrorism". Why they have not been hauled off to prison for 100 year sentences each is beyond me.

  • 5 Posted by nolo_8 on Wed May 14, 2008 5:31PM EDT Report Abuse

    Peer Guardian: Protect yourself on P2P networks by blocking IPs. http://www.download.com/PeerGuardian/3000-2144_4-10438288.html?tag=lst-1&cdlPid=10440558

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 Next Last

Post a Comment

 

Sign In to see your profile information, saved products and more...

Register Sign In

My Favorite Gadgets

 

Recent Activity

 

Recently Viewed

on | off on | off
 

Recent Searches

on | off on | off
 
 
 

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.