Wed May 14, 2008 11:10AM EDT
See Comments (13)
Ever wonder how the RIAA decides who to sue when it comes to its tens of thousands of music-sharing lawsuits? The Chronicle of Higher Education has discussed the matter in depth with an RIAA employee, who remains anonymous in this story, to outline exactly how it hunts down the people it eventually sues.
Those of us who live down the rabbit hole of tech know most of these details already, but if you're a casual technology user and have ever used a peer-to-peer app, you'll probably find this fascinating. That said, it's also interesting to hear directly from the RIAA confirming what we, for the most part, already knew.
Here's the digested version of the process: The RIAA uses MediaSentry, an independent company, to search LimeWire for a list of songs the RIAA's members own. MediaSentry just goes down the list, and when it finds a match, the IP address of the file sharer is recorded. There's no word on whether newer songs get more attention, but that seems probable.
MediaSentry matches the IP address to the ISP that owns it, and then the subpoenas kick in: Once the RIAA is given an IP address and the name of the ISP, it can subpoena that ISP for the identity of the subscriber that was using the IP address at that particular time. Then the lawsuits and DMCA notices fly, especially with regard to universities, where the bulk of infringement is said to take place and where results (that is, music being taken offline) are often swift.
Some important points: The RIAA doesn't, and can't, track who's downloading music, only who's sharing it on their hard drive. Though reports have surfaced in recent months that the RIAA might be running its own "honey pot" servers designed to trap people looking for illegal music, and that it seeds P2P networks with fake versions of popular songs, these activities don't appear to be the focus of the group. Nor should they, really: It is considerably easier to just search P2P networks for contraband rather than running your own in the hopes that a pirate will wander by.
Another interesting point: LimeWire is the only P2P network mentioned by name in the story. While other services, including eDonkey and BitTorrent, offer just as much (or more) copyrighted material, it's interesting to see that LimeWire may be a focus. MediaSentry may indeed search these other networks for contraband, but it's curious that LimeWire seems to be the focus.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
LimeWire is the only P2P network...
I find the idea of those 'honey pot' servers to be a tad bit not legal. Given the fact that they may be giving false files that might have some form of malware on them, it's all the more illegal. I didn't think the RIAA would go as far as setting up honey pots.
Groups like RIAA and MPAA need to get over the split milk and work on a medium where artist%
would like to see yahoo do an unbiased report on filesharing instead of there, lets scare them into stopping. it doesnt matter what the riaa or the mpaa do the will never stop filesharing. if they close down a site another will open, if they stop a technology someone will make another way to share. not all artist are money grabbing butt monkeys (remember the napster bad cartoon with metallica, now that was funny). some are embracing the new technology. http://www.coldelectricmusic.com/ is one of these bands (nothing to do with me just the last one i looked at) not only are their songs posted on their website but he band have also made torrents and posted on sites because they know it's a good way to get people listing to their songs. the record industry need to wake up and develop a new business model instead of trying to cling on to a dying business. and if anything taking people to court only gives negative publicity and makes them look worse then they really are.
I'm honestly surpised that someone hasn't developed a P2P program that uses a KEY and a heuristic rountine to block suspicious scans. To really be the overboard devils' advocate type, it's sounds like any one that doesn't isn't a friend or even an evil cohort...it's a wilderness, isn't it? Okay, I'm done with the mad scientist stuff now.
who cares if people download music from p2p networks. i sure as heck don't wanna pay for 20 bucks for a cd that im gonna throw away evetualy so why is the riaa making a fuss out of downloading music from a alternative source because some people don't wanna pay for music especially not in this society. they really need get their head out of the a$$e$
nolo_8: Comments can take up to 20 minutes to appear.... it wasn't removed, it just wasn't live yet.
Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 Posted by nolo_8 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:40PM EDT Report Abuse
thanks yahoo, nice to see my comment removed for helping out. :)