Thu May 15, 2008 12:23PM EDT
See Comments (3)
3G: Good. 3G at five or six times the current speed: Better.
In 2009, AT&T says it plans to dramatically boost its 3G speeds by moving its full network to HSPA (High Speed Packet Access), a slower version of which is already up and running in limited areas. At 20Mbps, HSPA could be huge: That's considerably faster than almost any wired broadband technology in use today.
AT&T hasn't announced a roadmap for the release other than to say "sometime in 2009," nor has a city-by-city plan been announced. (It's normal for rollouts like this to proceed in stages from one municipality to another.)
Even better: HSPA isn't even considered a 4G technology. For that, AT&T is looking to LTE (Long Term Evolution) for 2010, which could offer 100Mbps throughput when it's finally rolled out. Now we're talking!
Incidentally, end-user equipment using HSPA technology is already hitting the market. Fujitsu recently sent me its LifeBook T2010 (the U810 also has HSPA available) with integrated HSPA, and I got to see what HSPA can do in the real world today.
So far it's promising but not out of the park. Results varied widely depending on where I did my testing, ranging from 1Mbps to 2Mbps downstream and anywhere from 60kbps to 1.2Mbps upstream. Signal quality varies widely, of course, and you'll get far better results outdoors than inside. Of course, when the network is upgraded these figures should rise dramatically.
So, good news for wireless junkies, and curious timing considering the almost-certain announcement of the 3G iPhone on June 9. Will Steve Jobs announce more than just a 3G iPhone, one that incorporates HSPA technology as well, finally bringing the iPhone into the modern era of wireless? I wouldn't be surprised, but I would be impressed.
Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.
My guess is they want to spread the correct type of coverage. Maybe At&t waited to deploy this instead of a slower ev-do speed technology. Think about it will Verizon or Alltel offer this type of speed (20 mbps) by 2009? I think not. I am skeptical of Alltel anyways. They seem to enjoy twisting words and facts into very profound statements. Like the fact that they have the largest network in the nation. Alltel has around 13 million subscribers, while At&t and Verizon have around 70 million subscribers a piece. So how could Alltel possibly have and maintain a network larger than these giants?? just my thoughts.... (ps. Im from Arkansas and still dislike Alltel)
The real question is, Why are they upgrading the speed of their network, when their coverage is inferior to Alltel and Verizon. They should work on their coverage first.
Want a slim digicam that can take still photos as well as create YouTube friendly videos? Check this ...
| Computers | Home Office | Wi-Fi & Networking | Phones & PDAs | Cameras & Camcorders | TV & Home Theater | Portable Audio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Posted by rogueist on Thu May 15, 2008 7:46PM EDT Report Abuse
That's great news! But can you play games or run your P2P applications on their network? I bet you cant... I bet they cap you at 2Gb of traffic a day like they do now. Even my mom uses up that much traffic in an hour just surfing! They have a very unrealistic view of the consumer surfing habits and true traffic patterns.