Building a new computer requires 10 years worth of power

Tue May 27, 2008 4:36PM EDT

See Comments (31)

I slobber over new computers as much as anyone... but I've never really stopped to think about the environmental and energy impact that actually building that computer entails as an alternative to using my old computer for longer.

According to Ecogeek, the true cost of a new computer in energy terms is astounding: It takes as much energy to building one computer as it does to run one for 10 full years. That's a phenomenal figure, one which should give any would-be computer buyer pause.

One thing not mentioned, however, is that newer computers tend to use less power than older ones, so there are potential cost and energy savings to be found by upgrading (though perhaps not 10 years worth of savings). And while reinstalling your OS, adding RAM, and generally cleaning out your system can definitely reinvigorate an older computer, these tricks won't work 100 percent of the time. I'd be wiping the hard drive and reinstalling Windows on my current laptop right now if it wasn't about to literally fall apart due to a broken LCD bezel that prevents it from closing and a growing crack in the base that threatens to dump the computer's contents into my lap one of these days.

That said, with the 220 million tons of e-waste generated annually in the country (also per the story linked below), maybe a little duct tape and super glue would have been the more environmentally conscious choice.

LINK: EcoGeek 

Comments on Building a new computer requires 10 years worth of power

Post a Comment

Join in the discussion. Here you'll see the comments in the order they were posted.

  • 6 Posted by cnull on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:27PM EDT Report Abuse

    rorbincalendar - You're completely off base there. First, it's not about price, it's about conservation. As well, I am not recommending using "obsolete tech" at all. I am suggesting that people consider whether or not they really need a new PC when a RAM upgrade will do. Try re-reading the third paragraph instead of just ranting about something I didn't even say.

  • 7 Posted by krumpy_14 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:54PM EDT Report Abuse

    Cnull....have you computed how much energy it takes to build RAM? I don't want you to worry yourself silly...but you need to look at this from all angles.

  • 8 Posted by russellbly on Thu Sep 3, 2009 8:56PM EDT Report Abuse

    This old computer of mine has done my biding for 9 years , has had its ups and downs. I can't seem to shake getting rid of my old friend, so I'll add it to the new super duperbecause I know Its not gonna run like my watch too.

  • 9 Posted by bkhoste on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:08PM EDT Report Abuse

    Econuts will stop at nothing to destroy our way of life. They hate freedom, just look at what they do to people who choose to drive an SUV or Minivan. They hate the poor as evident of gas prices and they standing in the way of us using our own natural resouces so we can lower the gas prices here. Also, they caused the absurd idea of buring our food supply for fuel (E85) and that is now causing food supplies to skyrocket. If the Econuts want to make a bigger impact on the world and reduce carbon emmisions they should shut their mouths and stop breathing, this would cause a serious reduction in CO2 emmisions. I think from now on I will buy a new computer every year and put the old on in the trash, and noone can stop me!

  • 10 Posted by dudleyrobertson on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:49PM EDT Report Abuse

    I'm getting my buggy and new horse next week. The carbon credits are awful, but what are we to do in this new age of high tech living. Have to have my transportation. Tin cans and string work well. Newest thing in communication. How far back in time are we to go in order to satisfy a bogus environmental theory. Silly.

  • 11 Posted by mqarep on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:27PM EDT Report Abuse

    Oh shut up. What a stupid topic.

  • 12 Posted by ajrebennack on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:48PM EDT Report Abuse

    I guess I am wondering why we are supposed to be all hung up on conservation? The costs associated with energy have risen but there certainly is no shortage. As a consumer my price includes any cost of energy consumption during production and as krumpy_14 wisely points out there are energy costs associated with RAM or any other upgrades. As with most of the green movements analysis the Ecogeek source seems shortsighted and incomplete.______ If Ecogeek is trying to connect this so called conservation with global warming hysteria then they simply need to read some of the recent findings by Nasa and other scientific studies where any connection with mankind and the climate is dubious at best. They have even found global warming on Mars!

  • 13 Posted by ajrebennack on Thu Sep 3, 2009 2:48PM EDT Report Abuse

    Secondly rorbincalendar does not seem off base at all. Are you a tech writer or do you work for Al Gore?

  • 15 Posted by mneill0227 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:24PM EDT Report Abuse

    rorbincalendar...Wow, typical comment from an energy hogging American. Nonexistent problem...Wow! Too bad the rest of the world's people can't waste as much energy as we do!

  • 16 Posted by timesponge on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:10PM EDT Report Abuse

    My computer uses very little power. Therefore a new one would require 10 years worth of very little power. Sounds like a good deal. I thought it would take more energy than that.

  • 17 Posted by strugglin_ac on Thu Sep 3, 2009 9:45PM EDT Report Abuse

    Wonder how much energy is needed to make ''a little duct tape and super glue.'' Hooray, something new to fret about! Congratulations on your sanity, Krumpy_14 and rorbincalendar. It's tiring and sad to see the world's anorexia just get worse and worse. -Strugglin_ac

  • 18 Posted by bwevers@pacbell.net on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:15PM EDT Report Abuse

    So what's the point? The amount of energy used to build and operate a computer is minuscule compared to the energy wasted by the President each time he flies his 747 to Texas.

  • 19 Posted by billywhittaker on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:08PM EDT Report Abuse

    This environmental crap is getting out of hand. Who cares?! Carbon credits.......ROFL.....think i will run out and buy a new one.....tell Al Gore to run out and buy a few extra carbon thingys to cover me.......LOL

  • 20 Posted by david_na2002 on Thu Sep 3, 2009 3:38PM EDT Report Abuse

    New computers are better, period ! The only set back to most users is the price, and that's getting more affordable. And who cares how much energy it takes to build it. We'll all be better off if everyone is communicating more effectively and working more efficiently. And next time site your source for the data.

  • 21 Posted by martyneilan on Thu Sep 3, 2009 7:09PM EDT Report Abuse

    To agustin2489, Smapping a couple of RAM chips into a motherboard and connecting a cable to the harddrive does not count as "building" a PC and will doubtfully save any energy. I believe most of the "ten years of power" is used in manufacturing the motherboard, CPU, and various other chips - not to mention the monitor, if that is included in the estimate.

  • 22 Posted by wakk0_w on Thu Sep 3, 2009 10:39PM EDT Report Abuse

    The best thing for the planet is for people to stop existing. So go ahead, will yourself out of existence. I would but I'm too darn lazy.

  • 23 Posted by i8pikachu on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:22PM EDT Report Abuse

    Another article advocating a return to pre-industrial times. Ridiculous.

  • 24 Posted by fmann116f on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:01PM EDT Report Abuse

    I still have my 1997 Pentium 2 and it now runs Windows XP. I have upgraded it with some things it didn't have when I bought it. it is old and I don't know when it will go Kaput, maybe soon but I'm fine with it. It works and gets the job done. I can get my e-mails and use it for games or do some minor work things. That's all It needs to do. I'm fine with it and that's all that matters to me.

  • 25 Posted by juliestlgirl on Thu Sep 3, 2009 4:44PM EDT Report Abuse

    Ok, so as computers become more energy efficient (such as blades) are we going to feel worse about purchasing a new one? Ten years of power for a PC (especially one with an SSD) really isn't all that much, and the power to create it very well may have come from a clean source. This sounds like a stretch for a "green" article.

More Posts: First Prev 1 2 3 Next Last

Post a Comment


My Tech

Please enable your browser's cookies to activate the My Tech column.

Also on Yahoo! Tech

Computers Home Office Wi-Fi & Networking Phones & PDAs Cameras & Camcorders TV & Home Theater Portable Audio
 

Question and Answer content at Yahoo! Tech is written by Yahoo! users at Yahoo! Answers. Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. For more information, read the Full Disclaimer.

Opinions expressed by the Advisors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Yahoo! Inc. Yahoo! receives no compensation from any manufacturer or distributor nor does it compensate any Advisor for the coverage of any product or service in any Advisor's content.